Quantcast
Channel: sticky fingers | Labor Relations Institute
Viewing all 142 articles
Browse latest View live

Labor Relations INK June 2019

$
0
0

In this issue:

  • Oregon Fast Food Chain Goes Mail Ballot
  • The Gig Economy
  • Transportation & Logistics
  • Scoreboard, SEIU Watch, Insight and more…

The bottom of each story contains a link to the individual post on our site.

**********

Labor Relations Insight by Phil Wilson

New Decision Protects Employer Property

The NLRB is steadily rolling back (or I’d call it rationalizing) a number of the more outrageous Obama-era NLRB decisions. Earlier this month they returned to the longstanding rule that employers do not have to welcome union organizers onto public areas of their private property.

The Supreme Court has ruled in two important decisions (Babcock & Wilcox and Lechmere) that employers generally have the right to exclude non-employee organizers from their private property. These cases carve out very limited exceptions for when organizers might gain access to an employer’s private property.

In NLRB v. Babcock & Wilcox Co., 351 U.S. 105 (1956), the Supreme Court held that while an employer can’t prohibit employees from soliciting each other, “no such obligation is owed nonemployee organizers.” The court then held an employer can restrict access to union organizers so long as the union has other ways to access employees and that it is not withholding access in a discriminatory way.

In Lechmere, Inc. v. NLRB, 502 U.S. 527 (1992), the Supreme Court reaffirmed and extended Babcock. It held that employers can restrict nonemployee union access to an employee parking lot on the employer’s property. The Court even said that the Babcock access exception would only apply in “rare cases” and where it was absolutely necessary to protect the Section 7 rights of employees. The Supreme Court in Lechmere went out of its way to remind everyone that outside of this very limited exception, “Section 7 simply does not protect nonemployee union organizers . . . .” Not much to argue about, right?

Not so fast. Over the last 30 years unions and pro-labor Boards have sought to create additional exceptions to broaden the general Babcock and Lechmere access framework. They set their sights on access to “public spaces” on the employer’s property like cafeterias. Numerous Board decisions over this period have given union organizers access to these public spaces.

Most Circuit Courts who have considered the issue continue to follow Babcock and Lechmere, but this month the Board wanted to make clear that its position is clear. There is no “public space” exception outside of the limited circumstances of what the Supreme Court provided in Babcock and Lechmere.

In UPMC (368 NLRB No. 2) the NLRB clarified that an employer does not have to allow access to its facility by nonemployees for promotional or organizing purposes. They further state that just because there is a public space like a cafeteria located on company private property does not mean nonemployees get access to that public space.

The Board also clarified that the general rule is that an employer’s private property remains private and they can establish and enforce any access they want as long as they are facially neutral and consistently enforced. Absent a showing of discrimination, the employer is free to decide what activities, if any, nonemployees get to do. They have the right to eject someone who violates those rules, even if they are a union organizer.

What’s the key takeaway for you? First, make sure to review your no solicitation rules and practices. If you have public spaces, make sure you are clear that your rules apply to these spaces as well. These rules must be facially neutral and consistently enforced.

Second (and most important) make sure your supervisors know and understand the rules. The key problem in most of these cases it that exceptions to the rule get made from time to time, and those exceptions are later used as evidence of discrimination whenever the union wants access.

The UPMC decision is a welcome clarification to this consistent encroachment to employer private property over the last several decades. And it’s a great time review your no solicitation rules and practices.

Link & Comments

**********

Union Bailout Update

NLRB General Counsel, Peter Robb, issued two memos adding guidelines to the December 2017 Boeing decision, which established a new standard for evaluating workplace rules. In the memos, Robb explains that it is lawful to:

  • require employees to cooperate in workplace investigations,
  • require employees to maintain a professional appearance, free of  “[a]ny . . . inappropriate commercial advertising or insignia,”
  • define confidential information to include business plans, internal correspondence, customer lists, and personally identifiable customer and employee information and prohibit employees from
  • disclosing such information, and
  • prohibit employees from communicating with the media on behalf of the employer.

In Nuance Transportation, which elicited the memos, the GC found the following to be unlawful:

  • A rule prohibiting employees from sharing payroll information.
  • A rule prohibiting all “non-business use” of the employer’s email system, or using email for matters that did not “promote the [employer’s] objectives” was not only unlawfully overbroad, but it conflicted with a policy that allowed limited personal use of the email.
  • A rule prohibiting personal cell phone use because it prohibited employees from using their phones to communicate with each other regarding, or take photographs to document workplaces concerns, during non-work hours.

The NLRB has announced new rulemaking priorities, to include:

  • access to an employer’s private property;
  • standards to determine when students who perform work at a private college or university in connection with their studies are “employees” within Section 2(3) of the NLRA; and
  • representation election regulations, including the Board’s current procedures for blocking an election petition after the filing of an unfair labor practices charge, voluntary recognition, and the formation of Section 9(a) bargaining relationships in the construction industry.

It is anticipated that the proposed rules will be made public in September.

It looks like giant rat inflatables may no longer be considered lawful union speech (against a neutral party), but instead classified as picketing, and thus illegal. When a Chicago IBEW local hung some banners and set up an inflatable “Corporate Fat Cat” balloon, the NLRB General Counsel pressed the board’s Chicago office to issue a complaint. In his advice memo, the GC said the banner was a “functional equivalent” of a picket sign, and by having it next to the inflatable rat, the union was picketing a neutral employer, thus violating Section 8(b)(4) of the National Labor Relations Act. The parties informally settled the matter, so the board will have to wait for another opportune time to prosecute the issue.

Early in his tenure, President Trump used an Executive Order to initiate an overhaul to the apprenticeship training system, reducing government oversight and allowing industry to set the standards and handle certification. No proposed program has yet emerged, but drafts of the plan indicate that parameters for the third-party program certifiers would largely remove the Labor Department from the certification equation. Labor Secretary, Alexander Acosta, favors excluding the building trades from the new program, siding with the unions.

In New York, an appeals court ruled a New York state law barring farm workers from unionizing and collective bargaining is a violation of the state constitution. New York Governor, Andrew Cuomo, hailed the ruling and urged the state legislature to enshrine farm workers’ right to unionize into state law. The Senate followed through, and passed the Farm Laborers Fair Labor Practices Act. The New York Farm Bureau had argued the state constitution explicitly disallowed farm workers organizing, and plans to appeal the ruling.

The overtime storm created by the Obama administration hasn’t abated yet, as both the House and Senate passed bills aimed at codifying new overtime levels as originally proposed ($51,000), rather than accept the DOL’s more reasonable target of $35,308. It is unlikely the congressional initiative will become law in the current administration.

Link & Comments

**********

Oregon Fast Food Chain Goes Mail Ballot

Portland may soon play host to the first two unionized fast food chains. Employees at thirteen Little Big Burger stores will be able to vote by mail ballot, after the company’s offer to rent a U-Haul trailer and run around town to facilitate in-person voting wasn’t deemed reasonable.

If workers vote to unionize, they join five Burgerville locations, also in the Portland area.

Link & Comments

**********

The Gig Economy

In April, the NLRB and the DOL both revealed their stance that Uber drivers should be classified as independent contractors. Last month, the NLRB released a memorandum that outlines their reasoning.

While there are 10 qualitative factors when determining contractor status, the NLRB places the most emphasis, in the case of Uber at least, on just two: “level of control by the company over the worker and how the workers are paid in relation to the company.”

Meanwhile, California has passed its own bill that applies a three-part test, called the ABC test, when determining employer status. “To be a true independent contractor, it says, a worker must be free from a company’s control, doing work not central to the company’s business, and have an independent business in that trade.” The bill still needs Senate approval to go into effect.

In New York, lawmakers just proposed the “Dependent Worker Act,” which isn’t so much trying to get more independent contractors classified as employees, but rather to provide more benefits to those who work within the gig economy. Click here for details.

The gig economy isn’t going anywhere. In fact, IRS reporting shows that at least 11.8% of US workers are now participating in this kind of part-time work, with that number on a steady incline.

Link & Comments

**********

SEIU Watch

SEIU-UHW spent $37.5 million on “political activities and lobbying” in 2018, which is more than their entire expenditure on organizing and representing membership during the same period. In fact, three-quarters of the political spending can be broken down into six recipients, each some form of a political consultant group pushing for certain statewide initiatives:

  • $14.9 million to Waterfront Strategies (Washington DC)
  • $4.6 million to the Fairness Project (Washington DC)
  • $2.5 million to Kimball Petition Management (Thousand Oaks, CA)
  • $2.1 million to Ohioans for Kidney Dialysis Patient Protection (Ohio)
  • $1.2 million to Savvy Communications (Rancho Mirage, CA)
  • $2.2 million to Greenstripe Media, Inc. (Newport Beach, CA)

In other SEIU news,

  • An ex-SEIU officer in Chicago, Robert Kurtycz, was found guilty of six counts of wire fraud.
  • A Washington State SEIU affiliate settled a suit last month, admitting that one of its canvassers forged a woman’s signature and the union has since been illegally withdrawing dues from her.
  • After being under an imposed trusteeship for years, Local 73 held its first election for new leadership in October 2018. Last month, the Department of Labor overturned the election due to union misconduct and ordered a new one scheduled, with government oversight.

Link & Comments

**********

SCORE BOARD

Who are the winners (and losers) of the labor movement? Don’t guess, just check the LRI Scoreboard

View this month’s scoreboard (archives also located here).

Download a PDF of this month’s scoreboard

**********

It’s All Academic

The National Education Association keeps losing local affiliates and they’re not coming back any time soon.

The Blue Valley Education Association (BVEA), which represents 1,800 staff in Kansas’ fourth largest school district, cut ties with NEA in May 2019. Soon after, the national union created a “new” affiliate, Blue Valley NEA, and petitioned the NLRB for an election in an attempt to regain its lost membership. It didn’t work. BVEA defeated Blue Valley NEA by 904 to 104 in a mail-in ballot election this month.

Link & Comments

**********

Healthcare

The renowned Johns Hopkins Hospital has been the target of a long running organizing campaign by National Nurses United. The union resorted to filing Unfair Labor Practice charges against the hospital last October. To avoid costly litigation, the hospital reached an agreement to post a notice of employee rights to organize. Contrary to the unions statements, hospital spokesperson, Kim Hoppe, reiterated that the NLRB made no determination that the hospital violated federal labor law.

Nurses at St. Vincent Hospital in Toledo, OH walked out on strike on May 6th and returned June 12 when a tentative agreement was reached between the UAW and the hospital. When given the chance to vote on the new contract, 57% of the nurses rejected it, leaving the group without a contract. Two other hospital units totaling about 930 employees took part in the strike until they approved new contracts in early June.

Link & Comments

**********

Transportation & Logistics

Just before Thanksgiving 2016, 95 truckers and dockworkers employed by Lakeville Motor Express in Roseville were laid off without notice and the company filed for bankruptcy. Soon after, the workers and their union—a Teamsters local—filed a complaint with the NLRB claiming that Motor Express “actually continued to operate, just at a different location in the Twin Cities and under the new name LME Inc.”

Last year, the NLRB found the two companies had been acting as “alter egos” and ordered LME to pay $1.25 million in back pay. Workers received the first of these payments this month.

LME continues to deny the accusation of wrongly dismissing Motor Express workers in favor of cheaper nonunion laborers.

Link & Comments

**********

Minimum Rising

House Democrats are expected to bring the bill for a national $15 minimum wage to the floor for a vote in just a few weeks. Confidence that it will pass appears to be high.

And when you consider facts like:

…it’s hard to imagine the Dems not taking this one.

Even if the bill doesn’t pass now, we can expect to continue hearing about a national $15 minimum wage throughout the 2020 election cycle.

Link & Comments

**********

Whistlin’ Dixie

Workers at the Volkswagen Chattanooga plant voted, for the second time, against joining the UAW earlier this month, but (big surprise) the union still won’t take the hint! Rather than accepting that the workers at this location simply don’t want a union, the Auto Workers are pinning the results on current labor laws and pushing for a bill that would prevent captive audience meetings during organizing campaigns.

Link & Comments

**********

Labor Around the World

On the final day of the International Labour Organization’s (ILO) annual conference this month, the UN labor body adopted a new treaty against violence and harassment in the workplace. The treaty, fueled by the #MeToo movement, aims to “protect workers, irrespective of contractual status, from harassment in places where they are paid, taking a rest, eating or using sanitary facilities.” More details here.

Also this month, the nation of Argentina came to a standstill when thousands of people took part in a general strike as a protest to government policies and the rising cost of inflation.

Link & Comments

**********

Sticky Fingers

Current charges or sentences of embezzling union officials:

  • Linda Woodford – AFSCME:  $4,000
  • Bud Sherwood – TCU:  $10,813
  • John Scarcella – ACT:  $10,000
  • George Peltz – IBEW:  $1,000,000
  • Robert Kurtycz – SEIU:  $85,962
  • Claudia Beltran – UA:  $30,000
  • Caroline Phelps – IUOE:  $36,923

http://nlpc.org/index.php?q=union-corruption-update

**********

Labor Relations INK is published semi-weekly and is edited by Labor Relations Institute, Inc. Feel free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you think might enjoy it.

New subscribers can sign up by visiting: http://lrionline.com/free-stuff/newsletter-signup/

If you use content from this newsletter please attribute it to Labor Relations Institute and include our website address: http://www.LRIonline.com

Contributing editors for this issue: Phillip Wilson, Greg Kittinger, and Meghan Jones

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to receive our labor relations newsletters and updates. You can manage your email preferences by clicking the link at the bottom of any of our email communications.

NOTE: if you are using older versions of Internet Explorer, read the text version, as the html may not load properly. We recommend upgrading to the latest version.

 

 

The post Labor Relations INK June 2019 appeared first on Labor Relations Institute.


Labor Relations INK July 2019

$
0
0

In this issue:

  • Control Versus Advocacy
  • Will 2020 Bring Sunshine For Big Labor?
  • California’s Next Step for the Gig Economy
  • Insight, Scoreboard, Sticky Fingers and more…

The bottom of each story contains a link to the individual post on our site.

**********

Labor Relations Insight by Phil Wilson

Labor Advice for Bernie

You ever wish you were a fly on a wall? I can think of a few times. When mom debated my punishment for opening the Mattel handheld football game a week before Christmas. Or the discussion outside the squad car after my “donut” incident. And these days pretty much any time my daughter’s door closes.

But I don’t think I’ve ever wanted to be a fly on the wall more than this last week as the Bernie Sanders campaign figured out what to do about its “labor problem.” And by labor problem I’m not talking about how to get more unions to support his presidential campaign bid.

Bernie Sanders got to experience first-hand the joys of dealing with a labor union. We regularly tell clients that you get the union you deserve. Bernie’s situation is exhibit A.

If you haven’t been paying close attention here’s the highlights. In March the Sanders campaign made history by voluntarily recognizing UFCW 400 to represent all campaign staff below the Director level. Not long after that the Sanders campaign entered into a labor contract - standard stuff.

But over the last several months the unionized campaign staff decided the original deal wasn’t good enough. They claimed it paid campaign workers less than $15 per hour, a wage rate that Sanders constantly harangues employers about being the minimum “living wage” for workers. Then last week the Washington Post broke a story quoting leaks from anonymous sources inside the union. That story was a barn-burner. The unionized campaign employees bashed Sanders for hypocrisy around wages and revealed a lot of details about the negotiations.

Another thing we tell clients is that when you find yourself in a hole, step one is stop digging. The Sanders campaign – and the candidate himself – spectacularly violated this rule. They publicly called out the union about going to the media (which is a protected concerted activity, by the way). Then they allegedly dismissed or reassigned campaign staff in retaliation for their actions, according to a charge filed with the National Labor Relations Board.

Yesterday the campaign and the union announced that they reached a deal to settle the public and embarrassing dispute. The final details of the deal aren’t public (yet) but it appears that the ultimate deal is very close to the one proposed by the campaign months ago. Sounds like a lot of knock-down, drag-out labor battles. A lot of drama followed by accepting the deal already on the table.

Everybody is making nice now (I’m sure the unfair labor practice charge is being withdrawn as I write this). Campaign manager, Faiz Shakir, stated the campaign was “proud to have successfully negotiated with the union in good faith” to pay campaign staffers a “living wage.”

More telling was the statement from the union. UFCW 400’s spokesperson boasted, “This is what democracy in the workplace looks like.” Indeed.

Sanders is having enough trouble getting traction in this year’s Democratic primaries. And the way this dispute blew up in the media isn’t a good sign. This was an embarrassing hostage situation with a union that seemed pretty willing to shoot the hostage. That’s not going away with this contract settlement.

This morning the House Committee on Education and Labor is holding a hearing on the PRO Act (aka the son of EFCA). The PRO Act has been promoted by every Democrat presidential candidate – especially Bernie Sanders – as the solution unions need to solve income inequality in the United States. It’s actually just a bailout for unions who fail miserably year after year to grow members the only way you can – by providing value.

Some may argue that this dustup with the Sanders campaign is an example of how unions do provide value to members. After all, these campaign workers are now making a “living wage” while out on the trail. But I see the reality much differently.

This dispute (and all kinds of others that we’ll probably never hear about) illustrate how union leaders inside the Sanders campaign are willing to blow a hole in the bottom of the boat their members are in just to get their way. They don’t think twice about it. They relish it.

In the short run, it feels good to get your way and to get the employer to capitulate. Although in this case, like many, the members don’t gain more than they would have without a battle. But in the long run, this approach kills the golden goose, and it happens over and over again.

The problem with the PRO Act is it just gives union leaders a bunch more weapons to attack employers. But it does nothing to encourage unions to provide more value. So the businesses – and employees - unlucky enough to get stuck with a union could end up like the Sanders campaign: out of business.

Link & Comments

**********

Union Bailout Update

Joint employer is still in the spotlight, as anticipation of NLRB action remains at high levels. Board Chair, John Ring, has signaled the agency’s desire to use rule-making to “issue guidance in a clear and more comprehensive manner,” including the issue of joint employer. According to Ring, the NLRB has received over 29,000 comments in response to its notice of proposed rulemaking.

One of the still-unanswered questions surrounding joint employer is whether or not board member William Emanuel will recuse himself from the decision. In the earlier Hy-Brand decision, which reversed the Obama administration’s joint employer standards, an agency inspector general’s decision that Emanuel should have recused himself reversed the ruling. Now documents leaked from the board, a Supplemental Recusal List, suggests both Emanuel and Ring would need to recuse themselves from ruling on the matter.

In a related action, CNN agreed to pay $70 million to settle a 15-year-old lawsuit brought by employees of Team Video Services, a contractor to CNN. The case came before the NLRB during the Obama administration, which not surprisingly found a joint-employer relationship.  A three-judge panel overturned the ruling in 2017, but CNN agreed to settle to prevent having to go back and litigate a number of factual issues.

Social media made headlines again, as an NLRB memo addressed cell phone and social media workplace policies. Bottom line for social media: employers cannot prevent employees from making disparaging remarks about the company, or providing the employer’s phone number. Cell phones cannot be totally prohibited from work, and employees must be allowed to access their devices on campus during breaks and before and after the work day.

The NLRB has provided more stability in situations where a collective bargaining agreement is in place but the employer has proof that the union no longer has the support of a majority of employees. Under the new guidelines, the employer must notify the union of its anticipatory withdrawal within 90 days of the contract’s expiration. It can then officially withdraw when the contract ends. The union has 45 days from the time the employer gives notice of the anticipatory withdrawal to re-establish its majority status by filing a petition for a new election. There is now clarity by the time a new CBA negotiation is due to begin.

President Trump has selected a replacement for outgoing Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta. A week after Acosta announced his resignation in the wake of his role in the Jeffrey Epstein plea deal, Eugene Scalia was announced as his successor at the DOL. Scalia, son of the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, served a short time as the solicitor for the DOL, appointed by George W. Bush in 2002. Scalia also served in George H.W. Bush’s Justice Department and Ronald Reagan’s Education Department and has had an extensive legal career on behalf of employers.

Eugene Scalia

Link & Comments

**********

Control Versus Advocacy

Richard Trumka

What is playing out at the AFL-CIO as Richard Trumka’s reign at the helm of the labor organization winds down is typical of labor unions in general. Instead of letting the successorship run a democratic course, Trumka appears to be attempting to hand-pick his successor.

Two current front-runners for the position are current AFL-CIO secretary-treasurer Liz Shuler, and Sarah Nelson, president of the Association of Flight Attendants. From an article in The Guardian:

Two top union leaders who insisted on anonymity said that early this year Trumka and Shuler were asking various union presidents whether they would support Shuler to be the AFL-CIO’s next president. These officials said Trumka, the AFL-CIO’s head since 2009, appeared at the time to be considering stepping down within a few months to make way for Shuler, but only if there were strong support for her in the federation’s 55-member executive council, which is composed largely of union presidents.

Several officials said Trumka dropped the idea of resigning early after the presidents of three large unions representing nearly half the AFL-CIO’s 9 million union members indicated they were not prepared to support Shuler – or anyone else at this point.

Neither Schuler nor Nelson will comment, presumably so as not to be seen as angling for the job before the convention in 2021.

Link & Comments

**********

Will 2020 Bring Sunshine For Big Labor?

As the 2020 general election looms closer, the labor movement is chasing its tail trying to decide whether or not they will ever see whole-hearted, labor-friendly reform effort from Democrats. In one breath, they laud the apparent support indicated by the backing of the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) ACT, co-sponsored by 40 senators and 100 members of the House. As they exhale, they remember the mismatch between past campaign promises and the failure of the Carter, Clinton and Obama administrations to pass such sweeping “labor reform” into law.

Be that as it may, they still feel compelled to direct the union voter base to support the most seemingly labor-friendly candidates, as if this is the only topic on the hearts and minds of Americans. The In These Times story linked to above provides this assessment of where some of the leading Democratic candidates stand on the issues.

Link & Comments

**********

Labor Solutions Corner

What do you do when it is difficult to gather your employees in one place long enough to answer their questions about unions, and to tell your side of the story?

In the last few months, we’ve been very busy helping folks in this situation. Healthcare workers are often mobile, or when in a facility, have very little time to divert from patient care. Stage hands are only on location during production hours. Yet they all carry smart phones and are in the habit of consuming media with them.

The solution is a mobile-friendly employee website, tailored to the company and the campaign.

But our solution isn’t just to put up a template website and throw you the keys. We secure your branding guide and images, information about your company and the attacking union, and then customize everything to fit your situation: menus, layouts, and content. Perhaps most importantly, we become a part of your campaign team – updating the site, sometimes multiple times per day – helping you maintain the exact rhythm of communication you deem appropriate for your situation, while providing our 40-year expertise along the way.

And we know about 90% of the employees who visit the site will do so from their mobile phone, so everything is designed with mobile access in mind.

Home page - dynamic image/button slider

Mobile screen grabs - buttons, dynamic graphics, Q&A, videos

Call us to set up a demo of this low-cost, high-touch campaign tool. And if you’re a multi-location organization, be sure to ask how we handle simultaneous campaigns!

800-888-9115

**********

California’s Next Step for the Gig Economy

California’s State Assembly just passed a bill that expands upon the state’s Supreme Court decision last year, which guaranteed the rights of gig economy workers — rights like minimum wage and overtime pay. Even more, this bill appears to make it harder for companies in the state to label workers as independent contractors instead of employees.

Uber and Lyft are not into it and they’re making it known. Both ride-hailing companies are in public talks with unions in an attempt to find a work-around.

Link & Comments

**********

Union Pension Turmoil

The Ways and Means Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Rehabilitation for Multiemployer Pensions Act this month. This legislation would “provide funds for 30-year loans and new financial assistance, in the form of grants, to financially troubled multiemployer pension funds…the program is designed to operate primarily over the next 30 years.”

According to the act, only the current severely financially troubled plans would qualify for the loans and grants, and the most dire plans will actually be required to do so.

Link & Comments

**********

A.I.’s Takeover

The pace at which technology is impacting the world labor market is stunning, which also means that the pace at which technological businesses can go from start-up to uber success is also stunning. Leaders at Microsoft and Dell know this, which is why they have developed a plan to pour millions into external entrepreneurial A.I. ventures.

Meanwhile, in an attempt to combat technology’s impact on the workforce, Amazon has just announced their new program in which they will spend $700 million over the next six years retraining at least a third of its US workforce for more highly skilled positions.

It’s an extremely thoughtful investment by Amazon, especially when others who work in hands-on roles are seeing their market slowly dwindle. Take cargo handlers at the LA Port, for example. This month, the Los Angeles Harbor Commission approved a permit allowing electric-powered, automated cargo handlers to be installed by the port’s largest operator.

Workers at the largest port in Canada, however, are still hanging in there having just reached an agreement that “robots will not be allowed to take over port workers’ jobs without the union getting a say.”

Link & Comments

**********

SCORE BOARD

Who are the winners (and losers) of the labor movement? Don’t guess, just check the LRI Scoreboard.

View this month’s scoreboard (archives also located here).

Download a PDF of this month’s scoreboard

**********

Minimum Rising

Two weeks ago, the US House of Representatives passed the Raise the Wage Act, which would make a $15 minimum wage a requirement for all employees by 2025.

In a last minute attempt to move centrists over to their side, Democrats added one additional year to the implementation deadline making it six years, rather than five, for employers to fully integrate the new law. The Raise the Wage Act still has to make it past the Republican-led Senate and the President’s desk in order to take effect.

Link & Comments

**********

Labor In Healthcare

Nurses at the Mercy Health St. Vincent Medical Center in Toledo, Ohio ratified a new three-year contract at the beginning of this month.

The real story here has to do with the lack of support that nurses received from their union, the UAW, during the process, most notably, when the union accepted a contract on behalf of support staff while nurses were still striking. In fact, the union even encouraged support staff to cross the nurses picket line during their six week strike. Hundreds of nurses resigned their membership to UAW Local 2213.

SEIU District 1199 fared better recently as they reached a four-year labor deal covering 1,700 registered nurses and LPN’s with Boston Medical Center earlier this month.

Link & Comments

**********

Right-to-Work

The NLRB moved to heighten enforcement of Beck rights by instructing regional directors to issue complaints against unions when union officials fail to inform employees of the amount of reduced union fees they can pay by objecting to union membership. Under Beck, workers who refrain from union membership are only to be charged for fees germane to bargaining, and are supposed to be informed of the fee amount. An example memo issued to the Director of Region 32 read in part that “it is difficult for an employee to make an informed decision about whether to become a Beck objector without knowing the amount of savings that would result from the decision.”

Map per National Right To Work Legal Defense Foundation website.

Link & Comments

**********

Whistlin’ Dixie

Despite the UAW’s bewailing comments about injustice during the election at Chattanooga’s Volkswagen plant last month, the NLRB certified the employee’s ‘no’ vote in last month’s election.

Link & Comments

**********

Labor Around the World

Countries around the world are coming together to fight international labor violations and to create a “sustainable global supply chain.” Leaders of the G20 recently released a declaration detailing its plan to “aggressively intervene in multinational firms’ transnational exploitation of workers.”

Last month, Vietnam’s National Assembly ratified the International Labour Organisation’s (ILO) Convention 98 on collective bargaining and the right to organize. The ILO is the UN agency for labor standards. This is big news for Vietnamese workers and the Vietnamese government itself. Expect to see a significant amount of contention in the coming months as the country goes through this major transition.

In the UK, a Court of Appeals issued a decision last month that may strip trade unions of their veto rights during collective bargaining.

Link & Comments

**********

Sticky Fingers

Current charges or sentences of embezzling union officials:

  • Rodney Capello – LIUNA:  $200,000
  • Esper Alexander – SPFPA:  $1,000
  • Kelly Carter – NLPC:  $7,130
  • Dennis Robertson – LIUNA:  $38,000
  • Jennifer Conway – AFSCME:  $250

http://nlpc.org/index.php?q=union-corruption-update

**********

Labor Relations INK is published semi-weekly and is edited by Labor Relations Institute, Inc. Feel free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you think might enjoy it.

New subscribers can sign up by visiting: http://lrionline.com/free-stuff/newsletter-signup/

If you use content from this newsletter please attribute it to Labor Relations Institute and include our website address: http://www.LRIonline.com

Contributing editors for this issue: Phillip Wilson, Greg Kittinger, and Meghan Jones

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to receive our labor relations newsletters and updates. You can manage your email preferences by clicking the link at the bottom of any of our email communications.

NOTE: if you are using older versions of Internet Explorer, read the text version, as the html may not load properly. We recommend upgrading to the latest version.

The post Labor Relations INK July 2019 appeared first on Labor Relations Institute.

Labor Relations Ink August 2019

$
0
0

In this issue:

  • Laboring Toward 2020 
  • AI, Technology and Labor
  • Gig Economy
  • Union Bailout Update, Insight, Scoreboard and more…

The bottom of each story contains a link to the individual post on our site.

Labor Relations Insight by Phil Wilson

The NLRB Gets Its SexyBack.

Do you remember where you were on September 14, 2006? Yeah, me neither.

If you were listening to the radio (or possibly iTunes… Spotify was just created a few months earlier) you were probably jamming to Justin Timberlake’s SexyBack.

The big labor story that day was that Ford Motor Company and the United Automobile Workers union agreed on a controversial buyout program that persuaded more than 75,000 Ford workers to leave their jobs.

You wouldn’t have read any of these stories on Twitter, since it was also created only a few months earlier.

But for readers of INK, perhaps the most notable thing that happened on September 14, 2006 was that two NLRB petitions, filed in long-term care facilities in New Jersey, were blocked by unfair labor practice charges. Those two elections – Pine Brook Care Center and Pavillion @ Forrestal – remain blocked today. That is 4,726 days ago – nearly 13 years.

Look, I understand that justice isn’t exactly swift in some Board regions. But what unfair labor practice can’t be resolved in 13 years? The employees in both of these organizations were deprived of their opportunity to vote on union representation this entire time. Their elections were blocked. And since turnover is high in long term care it is entirely possible none of these employees even work in these facilities anymore. They were disenfranchised forever.

Unions will claim that the only reason they block elections is because an employer’s alleged misconduct has so tainted the atmosphere that a free and fair election is impossible. My personal experience is that unions more commonly block elections where they think they are going to lose. They want to avoid the embarrassment of a lopsided public loss by claiming the employer did something wrong. But there are certainly situations where employers do commit unfair labor practices that should be resolved in favor of the union.

But these two cases illustrate the absurdity of the current blocking charge policy (not to mention the inefficiency of some Board regions). Thankfully that blocking charge policy is about to get much more rational.

On August 12 the NLRB published a notice of proposed rulemaking that ends the ability of unions to disenfranchise voters by simply filing an 11th hour claim of employer wrongdoing. The proposal is simple. Instead of stopping elections at the last minute, the Board instead will adopt a “vote-and-impound” procedure. In other words, in situations where a union claims that employer misconduct will impact the election the Board will allow employees to vote and then wait to count the ballots until after the charges are resolved.

This policy makes imminent sense. In cases where no employer unfair labor practice is found, the Board simply opens the ballots. If an unfair labor practice is found the Board will determine an appropriate remedy, typically ordering a new election.

This system gets rid of a bunch of the gamesmanship unions play at the end of an election. They know the vote is going to happen one way or the other. If they are just trying to avoid a loss, they will pull their petition. If they truly believe an unfair labor practice occurred, they still get their day in front of the agency. Only now the interests of the employees – who are supposed to be at the center of this process – are actually accommodated.

Another important component to this is resolving cases in a timely manner. There are a number of procedural reasons that a case can linger at the Board, but 13 years (and this is just two cases – the NLRB’s appendix to their rulemaking shows many more elections blocked over 1,000 days). Justice delayed is justice denied, and there are way too many of these cases just sitting on someone’s desk.

The NLRB rulemaking does not just fix the blocking charge problem. It also enfranchises employees in situations where their employer voluntarily recognizes a union. This commonly happens in the construction industry (what’s called a 9(a) recognition). But it also happens outside the construction industry, often in situations where a union engages in anti-corporate campaign activity to pressure a company into giving a union what it is afraid to attempt to gain via a government supervised secret ballot election.

The new rulemaking fixes these two situations as well. Now, in 9(a) situations the company is required to show that it has actual proof that a majority of its employees want to be represented by a union. And in non-construction situations employees are given the right to ask for an election within 45 days after their employer voluntarily recognizes a union. This helps ensure transparency and makes sure that a group of employees isn’t forced into a union that they don’t want.

These proposed changes are significant improvements to the election rules. While I hope the Board quickly comes out with other improvements to the election rules (like reversing the prior election rulemaking) these 3 changes are a great start.

Now I’m going to go crank some more Timberlake. And since it’s 13 years later, I’m doing it on Spotify.

Link & Comments

**********

Union Bailout Update

The Division of Advice at the NLRB will now be helmed by Richard Bock, who joined the agency in 1996 as a field attorney. Although memos from the Division of Advice are not binding, they do provide guidance to board regional offices and can be cited as persuasive authority.

As we mentioned the day it was announced, the NLRB has posted a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking related to election rules. If you missed our email blast, you can read the notice here.

The recent NLRB Walmart decision provides employers (and employees) with more clarity concerning unconventional or intermittent strikes. In the decision, the board reversed an ALJ who ruled that members of OUR Walmart (a UFCW-led association of Walmart employees) who failed to show up for work so they could attend a UFCW rally at a Walmart board meeting in Arkansas, were participating in protected concerted activity. The ALJ ruling was the result of Walmart firing 54 of the employees for violating attendance policies.

However, the board found that the “ride for respect (R4R)” that the Walmart employees participated in was one of four intermittent strikes occurring over a period of many months, and as such would not be considered protected concerted activity. Even though seven months had elapsed from the last short strike prior to the R4R, it was obviously part of the UFCW / OUR Walmart strategy aimed at the same overall goals, and was thus unprotected.

In a recent 3-1 decision, the NLRB ruled that employers may require workers to sign arbitration agreements in response to class-action lawsuits and fire them if they refuse to sign. Click the link for details (NOTE: full story behind a paywall).

Arbitration agreements are in the spotlight, as states scramble trying to respond to the groundswell of support for the #MeToo movement. Fifteen states have proposed laws, with four states enacting laws providing some limits regarding what can be included in arbitration agreements. Thus far, judges have continued to rule that the Federal Arbitration Act takes precedence over state (and other federal) laws. However, the winds of change are blowing, and congressional action amending the FAA isn’t unthinkable.

The National Mediation Board, which coordinates labor-management relations for the U.S. railroads and airline industries, recently simplified the decertification process. Prior to the change, a process for direct decertification didn’t exist, and a “straw man” process had to be used to trigger a vote. Under the final rule, employees may now submit authorization cards stating the intention to no longer be represented by their union. If cards are returned for 50% of the voting population, an election can be held, to include the three options of current representation, no union, and a write-in.

As retaliation claims have risen over the last decade, employers should be aware that OSHA has recently refreshed its website to offer even more clarity about the industries and issues the agency covers. Although Section 11(c) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act is, perhaps, the most well-known retaliation statute that OSHA enforces, the agency is responsible for the enforcement of over 20 other federal retaliation statues.

The last step for employers in California to have to collect pay equity data is pending with the California Assembly, having already been passed by the Senate. If it becomes law, a private employer with 100 or more employees that needs to file an EEO-1 report under federal law must submit a pay data report including wage information to the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH). If the bill becomes law, California employers can expect to see an increase in pay equity enforcement action by the state, and more class action litigation on pay equity issues.

New Jersey and Illinois became the most recent states to ban certain requests and uses of salary history in hiring processes. Each state’s law is unique, so if this topic falls in your wheelhouse, be certain to review your state’s version, if applicable.

Link & Comments

**********

Laboring Toward 2020 

As election season heats up, unions are making hay by grabbing short-term employees from several Democratic Party hopefuls. One presumes they don’t anticipate much of a fight from Dems, so even though most of these folks will be out of a job come the new year, the unions might as well pick their pockets while they can.

The campaign teams of Cory Booker and Julián Castro became the latest to unionize, following those of Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. The Teamsters picked off the Booker staff, while the Campaign Workers Guild grabbed the Castro group. All is not peaches and cream for the unionized workers though, as an Unfair Labor Practice has been filed against the Sanders campaign.

At the recent AFSCME forum in Las Vegas, nineteen Dem contenders showed up to pitch their platforms to Big Labor. The AFSCME, usually one to quickly endorse a candidate, is being coy this time around, and it’s expected other unions will follow suit.

Sen. Bernie Sanders

At the recent Iowa Federation of Labor (AFL-CIO) convention, Bernie Sanders touted his plan to double union membership within four years. The plans strategies include:

  • Card check organizing
  • Compulsory mediation to first contract
  • Elimination of Right To Work
  • Codify the Browning-Ferris joint-employer standard into law
  • And more…

On the other side of the race, the Labor Department’s potential apprenticeship initiative may steer construction workers away from Trump. Although they were hopefully supportive of Trump due to his stance on job creation in their industry, the Building Trades may come down hard if they feel their job-training programs could be undermined. The Building Trades is a union federation representing millions of construction workers across the country.

Link & Comments

**********

Labor Solutions Corner

Mid-Year Elections Review Available Now!

Every quarter, our team at LRIrightnow.com complies a review of petition and election activity for the quarter.  The Mid-Year report covering the first half of 2019 is available now. Cost is $50.

SAMPLE GRAPHIC

Charts and summaries included in Elections Review:

  • Summary of the NLRB Elections Review
  • Representation (RC) & Decertification (RD) Elections Summaries
  • Most Active Unions in RC & RD Elections
  • RC & RD Elections per NLRB Region
  • RC & RD Elections per State
  • RC and RD Elections per Industry
  • RC and RD Elections per Unit Size

**********

AI, Technology and Labor

Artificial intelligence made gains this month in the communication sector and in delivery.

Chase Bank announced that it has entered into a partnership with Persado, a New York-based company that uses artificial intelligence to write marketing copy. According to the company, in the three years since Chase has been under a pilot program with Persado, the ads created by Persado’s machine learning system outperformed the ads that were written by humans.

On the delivery front, Amazon revealed that the company’s self-driving robots, named Scout, will begin delivering packages to customers in Irvine, California soon. Each robot will be accompanied by a worker for the time being.

Link & Comments

**********

SCORE BOARD

Who are the winners (and losers) of the labor movement? Don’t guess, just check the LRI Scoreboard

View this month’s scoreboard (archives also located here).

Download a PDF of this month’s scoreboard

**********

Union Corruption

The president of the International Longshoremen’s Association Local 1964 was charged with accepting $150,000 in bribes over the course of a decade from a company that employed ILA members. The unnamed employer allegedly paid these bribes to Glenn Blicht in order to keep the union from pursuing arbitration claims against the company.

John Coli, Sr.

Also in July, former Chicago Teamsters boss, John Coli Sr. pleaded guilty to corruption charges stemming from an extortion scheme. Coli also agreed to cooperate with federal authorities and to provide “complete and truthful testimony” in relation to any ongoing investigation. Coli has had significant relationships with some of Chicago’s most powerful elected officials.

Rhondalyn Cornett, former president of a teachers union in Indianapolis, also pleaded guilty last month for embezzling more than $100,000 from the labor group.

Last week, former UAW Vice President Joe Ashton was finally revealed as one of the top UAW officials who orchestrated the embezzlement of training center funds. The complaint that named Ashton also charges Mike Grimes with wire fraud conspiracy and money laundering. And finally, Norwood Jewell was sentenced to 15 months in prison for his role in accepting over $90,000 in illegal payments from FCA.

Link & Comments

**********

Gig Economy

The debate over how to classify workers in the gig economy hit a new high this month when multiple senators submitted a letter to Google urging them to stop its “anti-worker practices” and treat all people doing work for the company fairly.

And while in this particular case with Google (who apparently employs more than 102,000 full-time temporary workers), a request for equal treatment and benefits may be validated, a recent article in the Harvard Business Review lays out some considerations for why we should be careful not to impose sweeping, one-size-fits-all ‘solutions’ on gig workers. We highly recommend the read. Click here to check it out.

In other bad news for Google, the unofficial Youtubers Union has apparently teamed up with the largest trade union in Europe, IG Metall, to begin bargaining with the company over terms of the relationship between Google (YouTube) and its content creators.

Link & Comments

**********

Minimum Rising

After months of buildup surrounding the proposed Raise the Wage Act, including passage in the House, the bill has officially stopped at the Senate floor. There will not be a federal increase to the minimum wage any time soon.

Similarly, New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu vetoed a bill this month that would have increased the state’s minimum wage to $10 an hour in 2020 and $12 per hour in 2022.

Meanwhile, Oregon became the first state in the country to offer 100% wage replacement for minimum wage workers. The bill includes “12 weeks paid time off to new parents, victims of domestic violence and those who become ill or need to care for a sick family member. It also includes people who may be in the country illegally and those working part-time. Residents need to earn $1,000 a year to qualify.” Benefits begin in 2023.

Link & Comments

**********

Labor Around the World

Mexico’s government just took the next step toward legitimizing collective bargaining agreements in the country by publishing the protocol with which existing unions should apply for recognition. Mexico’s recent labor law reform bill, enacted on May 1st, granted workers the legal right to bargain collectively for the first time in the country’s history.

The UK’s decision to leave the EU continues to be put on hold as the country tries to work out what it really wants to do. Recent discussions include negotiations relating to the Irish border, talk of a Scottish independence vote, and concerns about the country’s building industry should all the foreign labor disappear.

Link & Comments

**********

Sticky Fingers

Current charges or sentences of embezzling union officials:

  • Rhondalyn Cornett - NEA:  $100,000
  • Asenath Roland - APWU:  $4,740

http://nlpc.org/index.php?q=union-corruption-update

**********

Labor Relations INK is published semi-weekly and is edited by Labor Relations Institute, Inc. Feel free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you think might enjoy it.

New subscribers can sign up by visiting: http://lrionline.com/free-stuff/newsletter-signup/

If you use content from this newsletter please attribute it to Labor Relations Institute and include our website address: http://www.LRIonline.com

Contributing editors for this issue: Phillip Wilson, Greg Kittinger, and Meghan Jones

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to receive our labor relations newsletters and updates. You can manage your email preferences by clicking the link at the bottom of any of our email communications.

NOTE: if you are using older versions of Internet Explorer, read the text version, as the html may not load properly. We recommend upgrading to the latest version.

The post Labor Relations Ink August 2019 appeared first on Labor Relations Institute.

Labor Relations INK September 2019

$
0
0

In this issue:

  • Laboring Towards 2020
  • UAW Strike Precursor To A Mid-West Recession?
  • Still Mobbed Up?
  • Healthcare Strike Threatened by Kaiser Union Coalition
  • UAW Corruption Scandal
  • Scoreboard, Insight, and more…

The bottom of each story contains a link to the individual post on our site.

**********

Labor Relations Insight By Phil Wilson

A Wag-The-Dog Moment For The UAW?

The UAW and General Motors are reportedly near a tentative agreement to settle the historic strike the UAW called over a week ago. Nearly 50,000 UAW members have lost pay, health benefits (and probably a lot of sleep) over the strike. It remains to be seen how much different the tentative agreement will be from the last offer by GM, or whether members will ratify any eventual deal. But the company offered some significant concessions in an effort to prevent or at least delay the strike. The strike is reportedly costing GM over $400M per day.

The UAW says the strike is about making GM pay members back for major concessions made during the negotiations that pulled the company out of bankruptcy 10 years ago. They point to massive profits ($30 billion per year is commonly cited) to say that it’s time for GM to pay. They point to announced plant closings to say it is time to protect job security for members. They want to eliminate the two-tier wage system they were basically forced into during the last recession.

GM for its part points to the fact that even with the two-tier system their “all-in” labor costs are nearly 25% higher than competitors outside of the Detroit 3. As they forecast business conditions over the next several years there’s not much optimism. The plant closings they’ve announced are positioning the company for an expected downturn in the global economy along with massive changes in consumer demand for vehicles. Winter is coming.

None of these claims from the UAW or GM are completely right or wrong, and this round of negotiations was bound to require some big moves by GM to avoid a work stoppage. But many of those moves were made. Still 50,000 UAW members are on the street. Why?

I’ve got a theory. Have you ever seen the 1999 dark comedy Wag the Dog? Just days before his next election the President of the US is caught in a sex scandal that is all but certain to end his political career. But a political spin doctor hatches a brilliant plan. They will create a fake war in Albania that will divert attention from the scandal. Then the President will swoop in to heroically “end” the war, just before the election. The war hero President wins re-election and the problem is solved.

This strike feels a lot like a Wag the Dog situation to me. In case you haven’t kept up the UAW is in a crisis like we haven’t seen since Hoffa Sr. was running the Teamsters. The Justice Department has already gotten guilty pleas from numerous UAW officials and just days before the GM strike the FBI raided two homes, including sitting UAW President Gary Jones. Millions of dollars that were supposed to benefit UAW members were skimmed and used to line the pockets of UAW officials. This scandal reaches all the way to the top of the UAW, who may soon join the Teamsters under federal trusteeship. That’s a club you don’t want to join.

The scandal isn’t just impacting the crooked UAW officials (and, to be completely fair, numerous Detroit 3 company officials) who are about to be perp walked. It is devastating to the reputation of the UAW while it desperately tries to stop bleeding current members and hopes to convince new ones to join. The crisis is demoralizing to its membership. If anyone ever needed a Wag the Dog moment, it is the UAW now.

What better way to change the subject and divert attention than a historic strike? This new “crisis” puts a huge number of members on the street, going to war against a common enemy. It galvanizes the demoralized. Perhaps this even serves as an example of the “power” of unions the next time they try to organize a new location.

GM employees come out the big losers in this situation. After this contract gets settled make sure to read between the lines of the press releases. Exactly what improvements are gained that weren’t on the table before? Plus remember that many times the last-minute offers pre-strike don’t get publicized so members never know what they really gained by sacrificing their pay and benefits.

There is no question that the UAW leadership is corrupt. I just hope their corruption isn’t what led 50,000 workers out on a needless strike. Those members are just the beginning. A strike of this magnitude impacts many other businesses and communities. Some even believe this strike could be the tipping point into a recession in the Midwest. That could create further damage to these families and communities.

Anyone asked to join today’s UAW should seriously consider whether they want to put their livelihood into the hands of “leaders” like this. You probably guessed my answer is no.

Autonews.com posted this timeline infographic - click on the image to see the source and review all the related stories.

Link & Comments

**********

Union Bailout Update

The micro-unit strategy abetted by the Obama-era NLRB just took another blow when the Board ruled against it in the recent Boeing case. The 2017 PCC Structurals case began to unravel the micro-unit strategy by restoring the Board’s prior standard for determining the appropriateness of a petitioned-for bargaining unit. In Boeing, the Board further clarified the required analysis for this determination, using a three-step process:

  • Step One: Shared Interests Within the Petitioned-For Unit.
  • Step Two: Shared Interests of Petitioned-For and Excluded Employees.
  • Step Three: Special Considerations of Facility, Industry, or Employer Precedent.

Read here for details on how this played out in the Boeing case, which dismissed a proposed micro-unit of 178 employees out of the 2700 total production and maintenance employees at Boeing’s South Carolina plant.

Although the issue of independent contractor status is far from resolved, a bit of good news was released by the NLRB. In Velox Express, the Board determined that independent contractor misclassification is not a stand-alone violation of the National Labor Relations Act.

Social media policies received scrutiny again when CVS Health’s policies went under the microscope. Two of their policies were found to run afoul of the Section 7 rights. First, CVS required employees to identify themselves by their real name when they discussed the company and their work on social media. An advice memo released in the case stated, “The board has recognized that requiring employees to self-identify in order to participate in collective action would impose a significant burden on Section 7 rights.”

CVS also restricted employees from disclosing “employee information” on social media. In response, the advice memo stated, “While the employer has a legitimate business interest in keeping customers’ and employees’ personal and medical information confidential, it has no legitimate interest in preventing employees from sharing contact information or discussing wages, working conditions or employment disputes.”

The Board just made it easier for an employer to make changes to the terms and conditions of employment without first receiving permission from the union. In MV Transportation, the Board adopted the “contract coverage” standard followed by the D.C., First and Seventh Circuits. If the collective bargaining agreement can be said to “cover” the change, the employer can act unilaterally.

The Department of Labor has proposed reinstating the Form T-1, requiring more financial disclosure by unions. The reestablishment of the use of the form would block the use of trusts by unions to circumvent reporting requirements in the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act. As the recent UAW training center scandal indicates, the move couldn’t come at a better time.

Two members of the NLRB have signaled that they are ready to reconsider an over 40-year precedent regarding employers’ off-duty employee access rules. The third condition of the 1976 Tri-County Medical Center ruling is problematic for employers because it does not even permit an employer to maintain a rule that allows an employee to return to the workplace for innocuous reasons, such as to pick up a paycheck. Board members Kaplan and Emanuel wrote a footnote in the recent Southern Bakeries decision that they were prepared to reconsider this third condition in “an appropriate case.”

Lastly, the Board has also signaled it is ready to curb abusive and profane speech currently protected by the NLRA, and is requesting amicus briefs. Click here to read the notice and submit briefs.

Link & Comments

**********

Laboring Toward 2020

Sen. Bernie Sanders

Obviously the best case scenario for Big Labor would be for the Democrats to take the presidency and sweep Congress. It may seem a pretty big pendulum swing from where we are right now, but with today’s political scene, you can’t rule out anything! With that in mind, it may be useful to take a look at what such a sweep could mean to labor policy.

Here is a list of legislation supported by most of the Democrat contenders:

  • The Protecting the Right to Organize Act, which would ban “right to work” laws that allow employees to opt out of paying union fees in unionized workplaces, even though they get the benefits of collective bargaining.
  • The Schedules That Work Act, which guarantees predictable schedules for workers, or extra pay if they have to work irregular schedules.
  • The Paycheck Fairness Act, which would bar employers from using an employee’s salary history to determine wages, ensure that workers have the right to discuss wages without retaliation, and require employers to justify any pay discrepancies.
  • The Family Act, which guarantees up to 12 weeks of paid family leave to workers, funded through a payroll tax on businesses and employees.
  • The Healthy Families Act, which would require most businesses to provide full-time workers with at least seven days of paid sick leave.
  • The Domestic Workers Bill of Rights Act would essentially amend federal labor laws to include domestic workers. But it would also extend new benefits to them, such as guaranteed paid time off, privacy protection, and a written employment contract.
  • The Raise the Wage Act, which gradually raises the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour and indexes future increases to wage growth. It also abolishes the sub-minimum wage for tipped workers.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren

One strategy that has emerged in the debate over “labor reform” is sectoral bargaining. SEIU President Mary Kay Henry appealed to the 2020 Democratic candidates to think beyond just amending the rules to make it easier to organize, and instead to consider totally revamping U.S. labor law. In promoting sectoral bargaining, Henry explained, “Bargaining by industry, where workers from multiple companies sit across a table from the largest employers in their industry to negotiate for wages and benefits, is standard practice in almost every developed country in the world.” Although this is really a stretch, both Bernie Sanders and Pete Buttigieg have folded sectoral bargaining into their labor platforms.

To see where each candidate stands on these and other issues, review their individual labor platforms here.

Link & Comments

**********

UAW Strike Precursor To A Midwest Recession?

As the UAW strike entered its ninth day on September 24th, GM was forced to lay off 1200 workers at other facilities not represented by the union. If nothing else, the strike has provided Democratic presidential hopefuls the chance for a little grand-standing solidarity in an attempt to earn union support.

The Teamsters of course jumped on the bandwagon already, refusing to deliver any GM products. The two unions have a history of supporting each other’s strikes. GM said it had plenty of inventory, but industry analysts have said they believe that will only remain true for up to two weeks.

Estimates of the financial damage to GM range from $25 million for the first week of the strike, to $400 million per day by some analysts. Closer to home, the $250 per week of strike pay for striking employees doesn’t come close to the approximately $630 per week earned by temporary workers.

Some analysts predict that if the strike continues for very long, the midwest could be plunged into a recession as the impact is felt by the 10,000 other U.S. companies that supply GM. Some economists expect 300,000 job losses due to the 50,000 striking workers.

With GM’s termination of paid employee health benefits to the strikers, the UAW has stated it’s intent to either pay benefits via COBRA, or make sure basic health needs are met. In addition to the weekly pay, having to make COBRA payments for almost 50,000 workers could quickly drain the strike fund.

Only about 2% of the contact language was in place by the September 14th strike deadline. Major unresolved issues involve the wages and status of new workers and temporary workers, who now account for up to half the workforce in the U.S. auto industry.

Click Image to view recent video

Link & Comments

**********

Labor Solutions Corner

Challenge: A tight labor market for specifically skilled workers, combined with a high demand for product, led this industrial company with facilities across the country to use a talent firm to bring in extra employees. They were concerned the pay disparity could lead to organizing.

Solution: LRI developed a two-pronged approach to reduce the risk. First, a deep-dive risk assessment using focus groups and LRI’s Multi-Dimension Interview strategy measured the level of internal risk. Second, LRI focused on training supervisors on two crucial front-line leadership processes. The more immediate need was to prepare supervisors to have specific conversations with employees about the talent acquisition issues. The deeper and more long-term focus involved strengthening the employee relations environment by training these leaders in the behaviors of approachability, through LRI’s Approachable Leadership Workshop and online follow-up reinforcement.

Company management was so pleased with the results that they decided to extend the learning of approachability throughout the company.

**********

Unions In Media

Most of the time, when we’ve seen media or tech workers unionize, it’s been with an organization like the Newsguild, maybe the Communication Workers. The Steelworkers though? Times must be hard for the USW.

This week, eighty Google contract workers voted to join the United Steelworkers Union. They will organize under the name Pittsburgh Association of Tech Professionals.

First thing on the new union’s agenda? Probably pushing for employee status for its members, which is what just happened at New Yorker magazine. Subcontracted fact-checkers and editors, a common practice in the industry, just earned employee status at the 94-year-old magazine.

Link & Comments

**********

It’s All Academic

The NLRB delivered a major blow to graduate student unions this month when they proposed a new rule that says graduate students are not employees, and thus do not have the right to organize.

This is the first time the NLRB has proposed a rule on this issue. In the past, and in particular the last couple of years, the Board has approached this situation on a case-by-case basis.

Members of the Chicago Teachers Union are understandably upset at their organization after a group of CTU members took a trip to Venezuela on what appeared to be a “state chaperoned propaganda tour.” More here.

Link & Comments

**********

Still Mobbed Up?

It seems anachronistic to talk about unions as havens for the Mafia, and most folks think of the more industrial unions like the Teamsters or the Laborers when they thinking about a union being “mobbed up.”  The recent sentencing of Vincent D’Acunto, former secretary-treasurer of UFCW Local 2D in Brooklyn, dispels the myth that mob influence is a thing of the past.

D’Acunto conspired with Genovese family soldier Vincent Esposito, son of the notorious late Genovese boss Vincent “The Chin” Gigante. In a racket run from 2001 to 2017, the conspiracy ring, which included several other Genovese soldiers and the secretary-treasure of another UFCW local, extorted millions of dollars of union funds from an unnamed Local 2D official.

Link & Comments

**********

SCORE BOARD

Who are the winners (and losers) of the labor movement? Don’t guess, just check the LRI Scoreboard

View this month’s scoreboard (archives also located here).

Download a PDF of this month’s scoreboard

**********

Healthcare Strike Threatened by Kaiser Union Coalition

80,000 Kaiser Permanente workers in hospitals and medical facilities across the country are due to walk out on strike beginning October 14th. Management claims to have offered a deal better than one that SEIU-UHW touted as an example at another healthcare provider, and included guaranteed wage increases of 3% across the board each year through 2022, preserve an existing pension plan and creating a $40 million workforce development fund. But while the negotiating team was still at the table, the SEIU-UHW used the strike announcement as an aggressive bargaining tactic to get more than other Kaiser unions have received.

Even as SEIU-UHW is attempting to show their “muscle” to union members while at the bargaining table, they are going behind those member’s backs to attempt to suck more “dues” out of their paychecks. SEIU-UHW President Dave Regan is trying to slide a “partnership tax” of $.25 for every hour worked into the new contract, ostensibly for an education fund to be controlled by Regan.

Link & Comments

**********

UAW Corruption Scandal

The UAW’s corruption scandal with Fiat Chrysler over the last couple years was just the tip of the iceberg. Since then, federal investigators have been led deeper and deeper into the bed of UAW corruption.

Recent updates include:

  • The investigation into the misuse of training funds has expanded to General Motors.
  • Former UAW official, Michael Grimes, plead guilty to wire fraud and money laundering.
  • Late last month, the FBI actually launched a series of raids into six locations involving UAW officials, including the home of UAW President Gary Jones.
  • In addition to investigating bribes, kickbacks, and phony labor negotiations, the FBI, the IRS, and the Labor Department are investigating whether the union made money from “tax-exempt nonprofit organizations connected to the UAW.”

At this point the investigation into corruption at the UAW has gone so deep that federal agents are considering charges under federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations laws. If RICO convictions take place, it could lead to a federal takeover of the UAW union.

So far, eleven people have been charged.

Link & Comments

**********

Gig Economy

Gov. Gavin Newsom

Back in May, a California Bill, AB 5, passed the state assembly. This bill expanded last year’s Dynamex decision that requires employers to perform the ABC test when determining whether a worker should be classified as a contractor or employee.

Since then, employers who work in the gig sector have been scrambling in an attempt to earn “exempt” status for their business models. Professions that earned exclusion from the bill include doctors, dentists, lawyers, architects, insurance agents, accountants, engineers, financial advisors, real estate agents, and hair stylists.

Professions that did not earn exclusion, despite major lobbying against the campaign in general — ride-sharing apps. And now that Governor Gavin Newson officially signed this controversial bill into law last week, companies like Uber and Lyft (as well as other tech firms in Silicon Valley) have some major considerations to make…and lawsuits to tend to.

In other gig news, yoga teachers are trying to organize.

Link & Comments

**********

Minimum Rising

Gov. Chris Sununu

A new Arizona law requires the state to calculate additional costs to the state government when cities and counties raise the minimum wage above the state rate. If the state has to pay more for government-funded services in these communities, then the legislature may require local governments to cover the additional cost.

New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununo vetoed a bill to increase the state’s minimum wage to $12 an hour by 2022 just one day after it passed the State Senate.

The unintended consequences of raising the minimum wage are already being felt in Oregon, the bastion of progressivism in the northwest. Fast food and grocery companies accelerated the implementation of self-checkout options to shed labor costs. In turn, the AFL-CIO submitted paperwork to put the Grocery Store Service and Community Protection Act on the 2020 ballot. The measure would limit the number of self-service checkout lines in grocery stores to two.

Link & Comments

**********

Right-to-Work

The Massachusetts House passed a bill this month that allows public sector unions to charge non-members fees for representation when filing grievances. H. 3854, a response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2018 Janus decision, directly overrides an August veto by Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker. The bill also gives unions access to personal contact information for all employees, member or not.

Also this month, the NLRB ordered Auto Worker officials to reimburse dues deducted from an individual’s paycheck after he resigned from the union and revoked his authorization of dues deduction.

Link & Comments

**********

Labor Around the World

UK universities are on the verge of strike action after an increase in required employee pension contribution. Union members at 69 universities have until October 30th to submit their ballot in favor of a work stoppage. If approved, this will be the second university strike over pensions in two years.

Meanwhile, a new report points out that union bosses in the UK saw an average pay increase of 10 percent from 2017 to 2018 and taxpayers aren’t happy about it.

Link & Comments

**********

Sticky Fingers

Current charges or sentences of embezzling union officials:

  • Brian Ahakuelo - IBEW:  $1,400,000
  • Rober Peter - APWU:  $34,500
  • Thomas Popillo - CWA:  $37,569
  • Dana Pullman - State Police Assoc. of Massachusetts:  $75,000

http://nlpc.org/index.php?q=union-corruption-update

**********

Labor Relations INK is published semi-weekly and is edited by Labor Relations Institute, Inc. Feel free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you think might enjoy it.

New subscribers can sign up by visiting: http://lrionline.com/free-stuff/newsletter-signup/

If you use content from this newsletter please attribute it to Labor Relations Institute and include our website address: http://www.LRIonline.com

Contributing editors for this issue: Phillip Wilson, Greg Kittinger, and Meghan Jones

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to receive our labor relations newsletters and updates. You can manage your email preferences by clicking the link at the bottom of any of our email communications.

NOTE: if you are using older versions of Internet Explorer, read the text version, as the html may not load properly. We recommend upgrading to the latest version.

The post Labor Relations INK September 2019 appeared first on Labor Relations Institute.

Labor Relations INK October 2019

$
0
0

In this issue:

  • Laboring Towards 2020
  • UAW Strike
  • Union Corruption
  • Unions in Healthcare
  • Scoreboard, Sticky Fingers, Insight and more…

The bottom of each story contains a link to the individual post on our site.

**********

Labor Relations Insight by Phil Wilson

The Iceberg of Ignorance

In the last month we’ve had the opportunity to conduct a number of assessment projects. This is some of the most rewarding work we do. It is truly Left of Boom work where a client proactively tries to identify employee relations molehills before they turn into mountains.

These projects usually include interviews with frontline leaders and focus group meetings with employees. Clients are often surprised to learn that we never bring up unions in these interviews or meetings. Why? Because the topic of unions is completely irrelevant (and even distracting) to a company focused on creating a positive work environment.

The vast majority of our time on these projects is spent talking to the two foundational levels of the organization – frontline employees and their immediate supervisors. That’s because these are the folks who know best what’s actually happening on the ground. They can state clearly whether the strategy of the company is actually translating to the day-to-day experience of employees or customers.

I ran across an interesting LinkedIn article that highlights a study explaining why this approach works. The 1989 study by Sydney Yoshida focused on a Japanese car maker, but it resonates with our experience in workplaces of all shapes and sizes. Yoshida researched who knows the most about what’s happening in an organization and relayed what he called “The Iceberg of Ignorance.” You won’t be surprised at all about the overall results – frontline employees and their supervisors know far more about what’s going on than levels of management above them. What may be a surprise is the vast difference from the top to the bottom. Here is a diagram:

The study reveals that 96% of problems known to the organization are unknown to top leaders. Even at the level of team managers, 91% of problems are unknown. That’s a major problem. It is very unlikely that top leaders will take any action to solve a problem they don’t know exists. And because the gap is so large, it is also very likely that they’ll make changes that can create more problems (on top of the ones they didn’t know about before).

Acting based on this poor understanding of the situation means that any employee relations successes are most likely dumb luck. And dumb luck isn’t a great employee relations strategy.

There are myriad reasons for this huge knowledge gap. In the worst cases it can be that higher level leaders just don’t care to know about the problems. That’s not been my experience. More often the case is that top leaders are focused on higher level problems. Ironically, these problems are often equally unknown to the lower levels of the organization. These leaders don’t take (or have) time to get to the frontline and learn how their decisions impact how the work is actually getting done.

At the same time employees on the frontline don’t understand why they are being asked to change the way they work. To them these decisions often look dumb (to be fair, sometimes they are). They resist, especially when they feel the decisions were made with no input from the people closest to the work.

The Iceberg of Ignorance is a problem in every area of an organization, but it’s especially prevalent on the employee relations side of the house. The good news is there is one simple (although not easy) answer: leader approachability. And you don’t even have to hire consultants to do it. Here are three quick tips for your organization:

ONE:  Think about the “structural approachability” of your organization, especially at the mid-level manager level (where known problems drop from 26% unknown to 91% unknown). What can you do to make sure mid-level managers have the time and space to talk to frontline employees and their immediate leaders about what’s happening in the organization? Create “skip-step” opportunities (birthday or anniversary lunches, focus groups, or fireside chats are great options). Most organizations operate very lean and put a lot of time pressure on mid-level managers. The less time you give these managers to understand what’s happening in the organization, the larger your Iceberg of Ignorance grows - it’s a choice.

TWO:  Make sure all leaders focus on their own personal approachability. Talk about approachability as a part of your leadership culture. Make sure leaders can describe exactly what it means for them to be approachable and how they do it. Ask employees whether they believe their leaders are approachable. And look for signs of it (do people actually approach their leaders with suggestions, ideas, or complaints). Consider the three core components of leader approachability (openness or right space, understanding or right feeling, and support or right action). Are we doing the best we can in those three areas?

THREE:  Run to the smoke. Whenever a leader senses there is a problem or concern they should go out of their way to find out what’s happening and do their best to drive that issue to a solution. They must go looking for problems and not just wait for them to show up on their doorstep. When we teach this to leaders in our workshops we tell them they should be a “heat seeking missile for frustration.” They need to look for things that create daily frustrations for their team; ask the question “what would make this better,” and then act.

I hope you will do something this month to tackle the Iceberg of Ignorance in your own organization. It’s well worth the effort.

Link & Comments

**********

Union Bailout Update

Eugene Scalia

At the end of September the Senate confirmed Eugene Scalia as the new Labor Secretary. The son of deceased Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia was confirmed by a vote of 53-44, along party lines.

The National Labor Relations Board set a 2022 goal of reducing its case processing time by 20%.  As of the end of September (the NLRB fiscal year), they had already achieved a 17.5% time reduction.  The average time from the filing of an Unfair Labor Practice (ULP) to final disposition has dropped from 90 to 74 days.

The NLRB extended the comment period on proposed election rule changes, moving the close date to December 10th. If you missed it the first time we posted, and/or still want to comment, go here.

The Department of Labor settled on a mandatory overtime threshold of $35,000, moving up from the $23,600 standard set by the George W. Bush administration, yet under the $47,000 mark attempted by President Obama. The new rule will take effect at the beginning of the new year.

In the spring of this year, an NLRB judge ruled that a T-Mobile internal program designed to collect gripes from call center employees was an illegal company-run labor organization, and ordered the group disbanded.  The Communications Workers of America were behind the push, complaining because the group was thwarting their efforts to unionize workers. A three-member NLRB panel overturned this ruling on September 30th, declaring the T-Voice program is not a company-controlled union, and that the group functioned simply as a “suggestion box” for worker concerns.

Link & Comments

**********

Laboring Toward 2020

Steven Greenhouse, a labor pundit and pro-union author, has “graded” the Democratic candidates labor platforms. If you’re interested in a pro-union perspective of these platforms, dig into the details in this article. Here are the overall grades Greenhouse assigned:

  • Bernie Sanders: A
  • Elizabeth Warren: A
  • Pete Buttigieg: B+
  • Joe Biden: B
  • Cory Booker: B
  • Julián Castro: B
  • Kamala Harris: B
  • Beto O’Rourke: B
  • Amy Klobuchar: B-
  • Andrew Yang: C+

Elizabeth Warren released her 14-point labor plan just prior to her scheduled participation in a Service Employees International Union forum with other 2020 presidential candidates. The plan outlined five goals:

  • Extending labor rights to all workers;
  • Strengthening organizing, collective bargaining, and the right to strike;
  • Raising wages and protection pensions;
  • Increasing worker choice and control;
  • Expanding worker protections, combating discrimination, and improving enforcement.

Link & Comments

**********

UAW Strike

Voting in the UAW strike is a mixed bag so far, with union locals are voting on separate days. Thus far, the Warren Technical Center in Warren, Michigan, a metal stamping plant in Saginaw, Michigan, and a transmission plant in Toledo, Ohio all approved the deal. However, a large assembly plant in Spring Hill, Tennessee, with almost as many workers as the other three facilities combined, narrowly voted it down. Many union members are angry about the provision of the deal to close three plants, including an assembly line in Lordstown, Ohio, and transmission plants in Warren, Michigan, and Baltimore.

The pending deal would dissolve the UAW GM training center, similar to the center UAW Fiat Chrysler center under federal investigation.

The strike has cost GM at least $2 billion, and according to some financial analysts could “bring GM to its knees.”

UAW goosed strike pay to $275 per week in the middle of October, up from $250.

Due to UAW strikers at a Mack Trucks plant in Baltimore, Volvo announced it will lay off 3,000 workers as it shuts down production due to lack of transmissions and engines that come from a Maryland plant the companies share. Although the Mack Truck strike isn’t linked to the UAW-GM strikes, the negotiations with GM could affect the Mack negotiations.

Link & Comments

**********

Labor Solutions Corner

In the Insight article above we listed some proactive steps you can take to strengthen your employee relations environment, but if you are interested in what an in-depth analysis provided by our MDI supervisor interviews and employee focus groups can do for you, we’d be happy to send you a sample report and speak with you further.

We’re just a phone call away:  800-888-9115.

**********

Union Corruption

Vance Pearson

We just celebrated the 60th anniversary of the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959. That is the piece of legislation that mandates union financial transparency — just where all did union member dues go this year?

We can thank the LMRDA for informing us of union investment in national bar chains, professional baseball sponsorships, and obviously, political contributions. Click here for some of this year’s most curious.

Speaking of union transparency, one local Longshoreman leader just pleaded guilty to taking $150,000 in bribes in exchange for not filing member arbitration complaints against a certain employer.

Vance Pearson, former director of UAW’s Region 5, has stepped down from his role in the organization after being charged with embezzlement, fraud, filing false reports, and conspiracy. He is the 10th person charged in the ongoing investigation of the union’s finances.

Link & Comments

**********

It’s All Academic

Sen. Elizabeth Warren

The Chicago teachers strike has entered its second week, with Elizabeth Warren joining the front lines.

Also, the NLRB extended the time frame for submitting comments on whether or not graduate and undergraduate teaching assistants qualify as “employees” under the act. The submission window will remain open until December 16, 2019.

Link & Comments

**********

SCORE BOARD

Who are the winners (and losers) of the labor movement? Don’t guess, just check the LRI Scoreboard

View this month’s scoreboard (archives also located here).

Download a PDF of this month’s scoreboard

**********

Union Pension Turmoil

Another union pension fund is asking the federal government for permission to cut pension checks to retired members. If nothing is done, the Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters and Millwrights expect its fund to run dry by 2035.

Meanwhile, retired Teamsters are lobbying for a federal loan.

Link & Comments

**********

Unions in Healthcare

Although it may seem counter-intuitive, the stronger overall economy is leading to greater union leverage in the healthcare sector. Among the contributing factors are:

  • Sector growth outpacing availability of qualified applicants
  • Larger union representation in healthcare than in other industries
  • Healthcare remaining a hot political topic
  • Aggressive nature of unions that target healthcare industries

One in every seven jobs created in 2018 came from the healthcare sector, and in July 2019, only about half of job openings were filled by healthcare providers. With the aging of the healthcare workforce and retiring Baby Boomers, this isn’t likely to change anytime soon.

Although the percentage of unionized workers in the private sector has been dropping for years, landing at 6.4% in 2018, it remained higher in the healthcare sector, at 7.7% that year. Using the rhetoric of staffing ratios, which seems to make intuitive sense, union organizing attempts in the healthcare sector are more difficult to fight.

The media and political landscape will continue to keep healthcare front and center in the attention of the general population, as the struggle over the “dismantling” of Obamacare confronts the progressive agenda of single-payor healthcare.

In the middle of all this, the CNA/NNU, the SEIU and a few other aggressive unions are finding plenty of opportunity to obfuscate facts, scare the general public, and use the power of strikes to enhance their leverage.

As this Becker’s Hospital Review article noted for October alone, hospital employees continue to be active.

Link & Comments

**********

Minimum Rising

Service Employees Local 32BJ is ramping up its efforts to organize fast food workers in New York City. Right now, they are working specifically on employees at Chipotle and McDonalds to sign union cards. The Fight for $15 movement – funded by the SEIU – always had organizing fast food workers as the end game. Though the movement has had some success in raising the minimum wage, it hasn’t made much inroad into organizing fast food chains. This time they’re hoping to make it into the endzone.

Link & Comments

**********

Alt Labor

Although businesses tend to focus on the traditional employee collective action threat of union organization, with the goal of collective bargaining in mind, there has been a recent rise of non-traditional organizational action.

Tech workers at Google, rideshare workers (Uber and Lyft), and those in the gaming industry have recently used the ideas from a book entitled “Labor Law for the Rank and Filer” written first by longtime labor historian Staughton Lynd in 1978; and then more recently revised with labor organizer, Daniel Gross in 2008.

According to Lynd and Gross, Big Labor and its menagerie of organizations fall under the umbrella of “business union.” A business union is typically “controlled from the top down by officers and staff (usually white males) who are not regularly employed at the workplace.” The biggest negative of a business union is that they are preoccupied with acquiring a bargaining agreement “that requires workers to give up the right to strike and any say in the company’s major decisions.”

Rather than organizing around a business union, Lynd and Gross recommend “solidarity unions — that is, worker-led groups that are not typically certified as exclusive bargaining agents under federal law and therefore don’t need to win majority support to exist.” In this set up, groups of workers “decide together on a course of direction action” to right any company wrongs. And they do so on a case by case basis without giving up concessions for the future.

In the case of Google, many employees argued for filing lawsuits or organizing with a union, but in the end, those espousing the non-traditional approach won the day, and the results speak for themselves.

Link & Comments

**********

Unions in Media

The increase in union activity in publishing continued this month as the Los Angeles Times reached a tentative labor agreement that represents about 475 members of the organization. After a year of collective bargaining and the impending ratification by the end of the month, the L.A. Times Guild will become the first ever union in the organization’s 138-year history.

Link & Comments

**********

Labor Around the World

Food delivery apps have become a staple in the gig economy worldwide over the last few years. That’s why it’s no surprise that, as unions continue their attempt to infiltrate the gig economy and fast food workers, their approach includes companies like Uber Eats and Foodora.

In the last month, both companies have formed the first unions representing food delivery workers — Uber Eats in Japan and Foodora in Norway. Both of these organizations operate on a global scale.

USMCA (the proposed trade agreement between the U.S., Mexico, and Canada) is supposedly ready to go as far as Mexico and Canada are concerned.

After U.S. lawmakers visited Mexico earlier this month to touch base on labor reforms pertaining to the agreement, Mexican President, Andrew Manuel Lopez Obrador, delivered a letter to the Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee — essentially supporting the agreement and encouraging Speaker Nancy Pelosi to put it up for a vote as soon as possible. Pelosi says she wants “more environmental protections, prescription drug protections, and worker rights protections” before she agrees to a vote.

Longtime Mexican oil union leader, Carlos Romero Deschamps, resigned this month after rumors of corruption, as did Australian labor boss Kaila Murnain.

Link & Comments

**********

Sticky Fingers

Current charges or sentences of embezzling union officials:

  • Gregg Pedersen – ACT: $6,320
  • Travis Cofer – USW:  $12,432
  • Tony Liesenfeld – AFGE:  $77,000
  • Earl Roberts – USW:  %53,697
  • Juan Evereteze – AFGE:  $38,000
  • Eric Childress – CWA:  $2,619
  • Mitchell Sharp – LIUNA:  $1,000
  • Ken Morris – AFT:  $31,000
  • Wanda Coleman-Gordon – APWU:  $71,063
  • Theodore Watson – Insulators:  $125,000
  • Michael Grimes – UAW:  $1,500,000

http://nlpc.org/index.php?q=union-corruption-update

**********

Labor Relations INK is published semi-weekly and is edited by Labor Relations Institute, Inc. Feel free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you think might enjoy it.

New subscribers can sign up by visiting: http://lrionline.com/free-stuff/newsletter-signup/

If you use content from this newsletter please attribute it to Labor Relations Institute and include our website address: http://www.LRIonline.com

Contributing editors for this issue: Phillip Wilson, Greg Kittinger, and Meghan Jones

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to receive our labor relations newsletters and updates. You can manage your email preferences by clicking the link at the bottom of any of our email communications.

NOTE: if you are using older versions of Internet Explorer, read the text version, as the html may not load properly. We recommend upgrading to the latest version.

 

The post Labor Relations INK October 2019 appeared first on Labor Relations Institute.

Labor Relations INK November 2019

$
0
0

In this issue:

  • AI, Technology, and Labor
  • Union Corruption
  • Manufacturing/Industrial/Transport
  • Right-to-Work
  • Insight, Scoreboard, Sticky Fingers and more…

The bottom of each story contains a link to the individual post on our site.

**********

Labor Relations Insight by Phil Wilson

Who Watches the Watchmen?

“Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?”
(Translated: “Who will guard the guards themselves?”)
Juvenal’s Satire IV

One of my favorite graphic novels (what we grownups call comic books to make them sound more serious) is The Watchmen by Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons. Set in a dystopian past, a group of “superheroes” helps the United States win the Vietnam War. The Watergate break-in remains a secret and the 22nd amendment is overturned, allowing Nixon to remain President until 1992 (when he’s succeeded by President Robert Redford). And the world is on the brink of World War III.

The Watchmen turns the typical superhero story on its head. The heroes are not heroic. They’ve been outlawed and either retired, live their lives underground, or work for the government. The entire series struggles with the question of what to do when the powerful can no longer be trusted. Graffiti peppers the book (or the great movie adaptation) with the words, “who watches the watchmen?”

Last week the NLRB issued its final report on its comprehensive 18-month ethics review on recusal decisions, which also focuses on the central question, “who watches the watchmen?” This was the first top-to-bottom ethics review by a federal agency. It was spurred by the controversial recusal decision in Hy-Brand, where the Board ruled and then, after a highly suspect ethics decision held Member Bill Emmanuel should have recused, rescinded its decision.

In the 71-page report the NLRB thoroughly reviews the roles, responsibilities, and procedures involved in ethics and recusal decisions. It concludes its current process and procedures are, “strong, effective, and fully compliant with all applicable government ethics requirements.” You can skip that part unless you’re a real labor nerd.

The Board then adopts a handful of action items intended to codify procedures to increase transparency and clarity of the recusal process. It also adds an important new process for seeking review of ethics decisions where a Board Member may disagree with a finding. In other words, a process to watch the watchmen.

The “must read” section of the report starts on page 40. Here the Board carefully lays out how the outrageous Hy-Brand recusal decision came to be. The timeline of the events – and the political gymnastics – that led to the decision are shocking. It fully explains why the weaponization of the current ethics process demands some procedure to watch the watchmen.

Here are some of the key moments:

  • Emmanuel was cleared to participate in the original Hy-Brand This was confirmed by the Designated Agency Ethics Official (DAEO).
  • After the Hy-Brand decision issued the NLRB’s Inspector General (IG) received a hotline call raising an ethics concern based on the (never before heard of) theory that two completely separate cases can be combined together – after the fact – for purposes of determining recusals.
  • The IG decided that Member Emmanuel should have recused himself from the Hy-Brand decision because it somehow transformed itself into the same “particular matter involving specific parties,” as a prior decision in Browning-Ferris Industries. This decision – while not binding on the Board – put the Board on notice of a significant ethics issues and they sought guidance from the DAEO.
  • The DAEO retroactively adopted the finding of the IG decision.
  • DAEO instructed the Board that Member Emmanuel must be immediately recused from further consideration or involvement in anything related to Hy-Brand. The remaining Members understood this meant that if Member Emmanuel were allowed to participate in any way (including offering a footnote explaining his objections to the ethics decisions) that they also were subject to ethics violations.
  • The Board requested a confirmation that the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) agreed with the decision of the DAEO. The OGE refused to issue a written decision or even discuss with then-Chairman Kaplan the decision or even whether they concurred with the DAEO decision. The DAEO repeatedly stated that the OGE supported the decision.
  • Based on their understanding at the time, the Board felt they had no other option than to rescind the Hy-Brand decision and to prohibit Emmanuel’s further participation in any way.
  • Over the course of their 18-month ethics review it became clear that the OGE and DAEO’s behavior during the incident were highly suspect. They misstated the legal effect of both the DAEO’s authority to enforce its ethics guidance, and the OGE’s flat refusal to even discuss the situation essentially eliminated any ability for Member Emmanuel to question a completely untested and outrageous legal theory.

Who watches the watchmen, indeed.

The Board’s conclusion is self-evident: any process where legal ethics officers can be pressured into making politically expedient and legally suspect ethics decisions without any hope of appeal or substantive review must change. Member Emmanuel was given no due process, and he and any Board Member who dared object to the outrageous DAEO or OGE interpretation faced potential criminal liability.

One critical action item out of the report is an appeal process (detailed in Appendix 3) for the unique situations where a Board Member disagrees with an ethics determination of the DAEO, OGE or the IG. After a number of collaborative ways to resolve these situations the process includes a method for a Board Member to note disagreement with a recusal decision and preserve that argument so it can receive legal review.

As the ethics report makes clear, this situation is very unique and in the vast majority of cases Board members follow the guidance of ethics officers without any question or concerns. However, this unique situation lays bare the fact that we live in a different (dystopian?) world today. Today somebody must watch the watchmen. Which reminds me of a joke (quoted from the character Rorschach in Watchmen):

Heard a joke once: Man goes to doctor. Says he’s depressed. Says life seems harsh and cruel. Says he feels all alone in a threatening world where what lies ahead is vague and uncertain. Doctor says, “Treatment is simple. Great clown Pagliacci is in town tonight. Go and see him. That should pick you up.” Man bursts into tears. Says, “But doctor…I am Pagliacci.

**********************

This article ends on a sour note (hey, it’s better than how Watchmen ends with a… nah, I’m not going to spoil it for you, go read it for yourself J!) However, I want to end on a thankful note. This is the season of gratitude, and I hope it reminds us to be grateful all year long. I am grateful for our incredible team here at LRI, our amazing clients, and you dear reader. Thanks for your support and your help spreading the word about our work. We are thankful for you every day of the year. Happy Thanksgiving.

Link & Comments Here

**********

Union Bailout Update

As of January 21, 2020, all affidavits, correspondence, position statements, and documentary or other evidence in connection with unfair labor practice and representation cases pending before the NLRB must be e-filed via the NLRB website. Mailed or emailed submissions will no longer be accepted.

In LA Speciality Product Company, the NLRB overturned an ALJ finding that an employer’s confidentiality rule and media rule violated the National Labor Relations Act. Using a balancing test articulated in The Boeing Company case in 2017, the NLRB explained that neither rule prohibited or interfered with NLRA-protected rights.

With the 2018 Janus decision, prohibiting public-sector unions from collecting agency fees from non-members, the plaintiff in the decision (Mark Janus) asked for a refund of all fees paid prior to the decision. The Seventh Circuit ruled in two separate cases on November 5th that unions have no obligation to refund fees collected before the 2018 decision.

Link & Comments Here

**********

Laboring Toward 2020

Bernie Sanders beat out Elizabeth Warren for the endorsement of National Nurses United, the country’s largest nurses union. The NNU backed Sanders in 2016, and despite Warren’s own Medicare for All plan, the NNU went with Sanders for 2020. This also brings to Sanders the support of the union’s super PAC. Sanders, like most of the Democratic contenders, has disavowed taking funding from super PACs.  It remains to be seen if his resolve will hold.

Instead of an endorsement, Pete Buttigieg’s campaign received a union instead.  His campaign staffers who have the title “organizer” were organized by the IBEW, and the campaign voluntarily recognized the effort.

Other endorsements may be slow in coming, as many unions may be waiting until the March 2020 presidential forum to be hosted by the AFL-CIO. The forum will be held in the critical swing-state of Florida.

Yet another union co-hosted forum is planned for December 7th in Iowa. The line up includes contenders Joe Biden, Steve Bullock, Pete Buttigieg, Kamala Harris, Amy Klobuchar and Bernie Sanders.

Link & Comments Here

**********

AI, Technology, and Labor

AI hiring software is becoming more prevalent and those in the industry say we should get used to it. HireVue is one of the companies getting the most spotlight for its offerings with more than 100 employers, including Hilton and Unilever, now using this system. Here’s how it works:

“Generally speaking, AI interviewing products combine mobile video interviews with game-based assessments. The AI platform then analyzes the candidate’s facial expressions, word choice, and gestures in conjunction with game assessment results to determine the candidate’s work style, cognitive ability, and interpersonal skills.”

There are obvious concerns when it comes to regulating these kind of hiring practices and Illinois looks to become the first state in the US to do so. Learn more about what the Illinois Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act seeks to address here.

In other AI news, retail warehouse operations are embracing ‘cobots’, or collaborative robots, to help seasonal workers with the flood of online orders.

Link & Comments Here

**********

Labor Solutions Corner

LRI RightNow (our union data libraries) has released the Quarter Three Elections Review report.

Filled with charts and graphs, the review includes:

  • Summary of the NLRB Elections Review
  • Representation (RC) & Decertification (RD) Elections Summaries
  • Most Active Unions in RC & RD Elections
  • RC & RD Elections per NLRB Region
  • RC & RD Elections per State
  • RC & RD Elections per Industry
  • RC & RD Elections per Unit Size

Here is one of the included charts:

Pickup the full report for $75.

**********

Tech/Media Unions

A former Kickstarter employee has launched a new project on Kickstarter that is designed to help workers unionize the tech industry. It’s called “Solidarity Onboarding” and it’s essentially an onboarding kit (booklet, pin, pencil, sticker) for tech workers who are interested in unionization. The booklet includes common “union busting” tactics and guides employees on how to respond.

Staff at Hearst Magazines are attempting to join the Writers Guild of America East. Hearst is one of the largest big media organizations in the country, owning publications like Esquire, Town & Country, Cosmopolitan, and Elle; and as such, would be one of the largest unionized editorial units in the media industry if it happens.

Also in media, 150 employees at NBC’s digital news division have announced their intention to form a union.

Finally, we reported last month that YouTubers are looking to unionize. Click here to listen to an interview about what this group is hoping to get out of their unionization efforts.

Link & Comments Here

**********

It’s All Academic

Rep. Mark Pocan (D - WI)

Wisconsin Representative, Mark Pocan, introduced a bill this month that would officially change the classification of graduate student workers to be that of employees with the ability to unionize. This bill, if passed, would potentially block the NLRB’s recent proposal to disallow graduate students and teaching assistants at private universities to organize.

Two teachers unions in Oregon are reporting sharp declines in membership and the revenue that comes with it. The American Federation of Teachers Oregon and the Oregon School Employees Association each report drops of 35 to 36 percent since Janus. Both unions have lost nearly $1 million in revenue as a result.

Link & Comments Here

**********

SCORE BOARD

Who are the winners (and losers) of the labor movement? Don’t guess, just check the LRI Scoreboard

View this month’s scoreboard (archives also located here).

Download a PDF of this month’s scoreboard

**********

Union Corruption

Former USW President Gary Jones

The UAW continues to steal the headlines when it comes to union corruption these days. In the last month…

  • Gary Jones, UAW president, resigned amid suspicion of his involvement in the ongoing scandals.
  • Jeffery Pietrzyk pleaded guilty to taking bribes and kickbacks in the ongoing UAW corruption investigation with both GM and FCA.
  • Joe Ashton, former UAW vice president, has been formally charged with wire fraud and money laundering in relationship with GM. Ashton is expected to plead guilty.
  • Federal agents raided a UAW-owned luxury lakeside cabin and resort.
  • GM filed a racketeering lawsuit against FCA.

David Cox

Add the American Federation of Government Employees to the list of union leadership being accused of ongoing sexual harassment. There are reportedly ten people who work for the organization that say they either witnessed or experienced inappropriate behavior by David Cox, President of AFGE. While this news is disappointing enough, what is even more upsetting is that the union reportedly told staff to keep quiet about it.

Link & Comments Here

**********

Alt Labor

Alt Labor organizations, like the Restaurant Opportunities Centers United, have long been known to be an outreach arm of organized labor. Operating in the background, they have continued to escape scrutiny of the rules and disclosure requirements that traditional unions are subject to (click here to view eight such entities, including some new upstarts).

 

The DOL has finally decided to scrutinize these non-union unions.  A Minneapolis worker center, Centro de Trabajadores Unidos en Lucha (Center of Workers United in Struggle), was the subject of a two-year investigation after it successfully forced Target and other retailers to hire unionized janitors. Conclusion: the CTUL is a labor organization. If this finding becomes official, the organization would be treated like any other labor union, would have to start filing detailed financial disclosures and could be restricted in its advocacy activities.

On August 15, OLMS Detroit-Milwaukee District Director, Thomas Murray, sent a letter to CTUL. The letter stated that the group has members who pay voluntary annual dues of $50 in order to be designated as “ally members” who have the right to vote on organization decisions.

According to Murray, “CTUL appears to employ multiple pressure tactics against Target and other employers to advance the interests of employees with regard to workplace conditions and actions, as well as possible employer criminal violations.”

That includes holding strikes, pickets, and press conferences, displaying banners outside of retail stores, distributing fliers, and protesting shareholder meetings.

“These provisions indicate that CTUL exists, at least in part, for the purpose of dealing with employers concerning wages, rates of pay, and other terms and conditions of employment.”

According to the groups bylaws, the group’s purpose is to organize low-wage workers across Minneapolis.

Sound like a union to you?

Link & Comments Here

**********

Gig Economy

The increase in e-commerce and grocery delivery apps means that the gig workforce is making its way into the grocery industry. In fact, many grocers are bringing in on-demand labor not only to fill online orders, but also to stock shelves, build displays, and run sampling stations. And with online grocery sales expected to almost double to $38 billion by 2023, we can expect this trend to continue.

California’s recently enacted bill, AB 5, which requires employers to use the ABC test when determining if a worker is a contractor or employee, has created quite a stir in the gig economy there. Proponents say that this is the way to give workers sustainability in their jobs. Opponents argue that most contractors don’t actually want to be employees, as it would require them to give up a lot of the freedom they enjoy as self-proprietors.

In fact, many companies based in the region — Uber, Lyft and DoorDash — are working on a ballot measure that would exclude many of their contractors from having to be transitioned into employees.

Link & Comments Here

**********

Union Pension Turmoil

Yet another union pension plan is in jeopardy. The largest private coal mining company in the country, Murray Energy, is the eighth coal mining operation to seek bankruptcy protection. Their workforce is represented by the United Mine Workers, and Murray Energy was the last major employer contributing to the UMW’s 1974 Pension Plan and Trust, which is projected to go insolvent by 2022.

Unionized workers at Pfizer rebuffed an attempt to reform their pension plan, moving from a defined benefit plan to which employees make no contributions, to a defined contribution arrangement where the final pension is determined by the contributions made by workers and employer and the investment performance. The vote may have put 800 jobs at risk.

The Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters and Millwrights receive pension benefits from the Detroit Carpenters Pension Trust Fund. The fund is in “critical and declining” status at only 34.5% funded, and projected to run out of money by 2035. Yet the fund has sunk tens of millions into risky investments, trying desperately to salvage pension benefits for the 19,600 active or retired members. One source close to the carpenters’ pension fund was “shocked by how bad the real estate investments were….They were investing in some of the riskiest stuff I’ve ever seen in my life.”

The union pension crisis isn’t going away. The Teamsters just hired a former aide to Senator Chuck Grassley (R - Iowa) to lobby Grassley and other senators on behalf of the Butch Lewis Act. The bill is designed to milk taxpayers to bailout pension funds, and passed the House in July.

Link & Comments Here

**********

Manufacturing/Industrial/Transport

The International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) got punched hard when a jury held the national union and Portland-based Local 8 responsible for $93.6 million in damages for instigating the dockworker slowdown at Port of Portland Terminal 6. The District Judge could modify the amount up or down, and has committed to hearing from the union’s lawyers before making a final decision, which could bankrupt the union.

The UAW GM strike ended as a deal was finally approved, after 40 days of walking picket lines. Even so, only 57.2% voted for the deal. GM noted that the strike is projected to cost the company over $3 billion.

After the GM deal was settled, Ford and the UAW reached a tentative agreement within a week of negotiations, believing another long, drawn-out work stoppage would benefit neither party. The deal was ratified by 56% of voters.

UAW VP Cindy Estrada

Next up are talks between the UAW and Fiat Chrysler. UAW Vice President, Cindy Estrada, who leads the union’s FCA Department, noted recently that difficult issues remain to be solved. One of those issues is the pending Fiat Chrysler merger with French automaker Groupe PSA (Peugeot).

One of the casualties of the UAW-GM deal was the closure of three plants, including one in Lordstown, Ohio.  Less than two weeks after the deal was ratified, the plant was bought by a group called Lordstown Motors, which announced plans to create 400 union jobs to produce electric pickup trucks. The plant is expecting to begin production at the end of 2020.

Link & Comments Here

**********

Healthcare

Unionized nurses at Sacred Heart Medical Center in Spokane and Providence Health and Services, voted to strike after over a year of negotiations. At issue was Providence’s desire to end the current paid time off and sick leave policy, and allow the nurse to rely on the state’s new taxpayer-funded paid family leave program that kicks off in 2020, a short-term disability plan and their own paid time off. Providence promotes the change as providing “greater financial security and more flexibility when unexpected needs arise,” but the union doesn’t agree.

A southern neighbor encountered problems of a different kind, when a VP of HR at Oregon Health and Science University created a fake social media account to “troll” the union, allegedly disseminating incorrect information about union positions. The university apologized, and the VP was asked to resign.

A strike was averted at Mount Sinai Hospital in Chicago when SEIU Healthcare Illinois announced the reaching of an agreement with the hospital for the 400 or so employees.

The vote count at Cabell Huntington Hospital in West Virginia saw 60% of the nurses voting in favor of representation by SEIU 1199, out of the 858 who participated in the election. As the reason for organizing, nurses cited short staffing, mandatory overtime and changes, particularly to insurance, since the merging of Cabell Huntington and St. Mary’s Medical Center.

Link & Comments Here

**********

Minimum Rising

One of the most common arguments against an increased minimum wage is that it’s not actually going to accomplish what it is purportedly setting out to do. That is, achieve more overall income for low wage workers. That’s because while the minimum wage may increase, the hours may decrease.

This is exactly what is reportedly happening at certain Target stores.

Last spring, the company announced its plan to boost minimum wage to $15 an hour by 2020; but since implementation began, some workers are seeing a decrease in hours — so much so that they no longer qualify for benefits.

Link & Comments Here

**********

Right-to-Work

A “settlement bar” is an unofficial NLRB doctrine that can block workers, for a period of time, from exercising their right to hold a decertification vote from their union. This usually comes after the union has filed some kind of action themselves with the Board that demands a certain period of time to fully play out.

Unfortunately, unions can utilize something like an unfair labor practice charge against the company as a tool to hold a rumored decertification election at bay, which is exactly what happened with Robert Gentry’s attempt to hold a decert back in August 2018.

Last month, the NLRB ruled in favor of Gentry and National Right to Work Legal Foundation, granting him the right to move forward with his attempt to decertify the Food and Commercial Workers.

In another win for workers, the NLRB Region 19 has charged Unite Here Local 8 with a failure to inform employees of their rights to reduce membership and dues to the union, should they so choose.

Link & Comments Here

**********

Labor Around the World

The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement is, seemingly, inches away from securing the changes everyone has been waiting on in order to put this new legislation into action. What’s the last little hold up? Labor Unions. Before Pelosi will announce a deal, she wants confirmation that the AFL-CIO won’t oppose it.

In Canada, the Food and Commercial Workers union is focused on a constitutional challenge that would allow the unionization of workers in the cannabis industry. In 2016, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ruled that the cannabis industry was agricultural and thus covered by the Agricultural Employees Protection Act as opposed to the country’s Labour Relations Act.

Volkswagen’s plan to build a billion dollar factory in Turkey is on hold pending labor’s approval. The labor unions say that they will continue to withhold approval as long as violence continues within the region. Meanwhile, they are also blocking economic expansion.

Protests and discontent are widespread across many Latin American countries. From Columbia to Chili, Bolivia, Nicaragua, Haiti, and Dominica, the defining theme is an uneasiness with the governing party.

In Mexico, longtime Railway Workers’ union boss, Victor Flores Morales, stands accused of embezzling 1.5 billion pesos. Other charges include fraud, illicit enrichment, extortion, and involvement with organized crime.

Dutch trade unions are seeing their lowest membership numbers since 1988. Unions lost over 100,000 members in just the last two years.

Link & Comments Here

**********

Sticky Fingers

  • Brian Arnold – USW:  $33,000
  • James Young – AFT:  $7,050
  • Deloistine Williams – USW:  $13,205
  • Jeffrey Phillips – IAM:  $1,000
  • Orville Merritt – LIUNA:  $46,000
  • Jeffrey Pietrzyk – UAW:  $123,000
  • Shannon Pemberton – IUPAT:  $6,403

Current charges or sentences of embezzling union officials:

http://nlpc.org/index.php?q=union-corruption-update

**********

Labor Relations INK is published semi-weekly and is edited by Labor Relations Institute, Inc. Feel free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you think might enjoy it.

New subscribers can sign up by visiting: http://lrionline.com/free-stuff/newsletter-signup/

If you use content from this newsletter please attribute it to Labor Relations Institute and include our website address: http://www.LRIonline.com

Contributing editors for this issue: Phillip Wilson, Greg Kittinger, and Meghan Jones

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to receive our labor relations newsletters and updates. You can manage your email preferences by clicking the link at the bottom of any of our email communications.

NOTE: if you are using older versions of Internet Explorer, read the text version, as the html may not load properly. We recommend upgrading to the latest version.

 

The post Labor Relations INK November 2019 appeared first on Labor Relations Institute.

Labor Relations INK December 2019

$
0
0

In this issue:

  • Laboring Toward 2020
  • AI, Technology & Labor
  • Union Corruption
  • UAW Deal Not All It’s Cracked Up To Be
  • Insight, Union Bailout Update and more…

The bottom of each story contains a link to the individual post on our site.

**********

Labor Relations Insight by Phil Wilson

NLRB Ends 2019 with a Bang

What a difference a year makes. In the last seven days the NLRB has issued several hugely important rules and decisions, and it looks like the Ring Board is just getting started.

It took a while for this Board to hit its stride. This was primarily due to political foot-dragging, like delays in getting Board seats filled followed by the weaponization of the recusal process. It was also due to run of the mill foot-dragging with Board opinions (I presume dissents). Those days are now over.

Member McFerran left the board this week after her term expired. As is customary, numerous decisions and rules issued as she departed, including dissents she no doubt wanted to make sure were included before her term ended. There was a lot of dissenting for her to do.

Perhaps the most important decision is McDonalds. While the joint employer issue still awaits a comprehensive final rulemaking (which could issue any day), this decision settles a critical issue to a huge part of the American economy: the franchise model. In McDonalds the Board found that McDonalds the franchisor is not a joint employer with its franchisees. The Board ordered an administrative law judge to accept a settlement on that basis. The sound you hear is millions of franchise owners and operators breathing a huge sigh of relief.

It’s hard to overstate how devastating imposing joint employment on franchisors would be to the franchise business model, which is responsible for the employment of millions of American workers and a huge part of our economic engine. Ultimately the Board’s rulemaking will create more solid protection, but this decision is a great start.

In a bit of a surprise, the Board also issued a rulemaking that modifies the ambush (or quickie) election rule from the Obama administration. These modifications dramatically improve the biggest problems with the quickie election rule. First, the rule provides a bit more time for the parties to prepare for a unit hearing and get employee lists together. It also provides a 20-day buffer between the direction of an election and the vote. These common-sense rules make sure the vote isn’t a fire drill like it is today.

More importantly, the modifications put unit determination issues back where they belong – before an election is directed. The ambush rule requires the Region to direct an election even when it’s unclear whether a significant number of voters are actually going to be included in the eventual unit. Instead the ambush rule waits to decide these issues until after the election – if ever.

These unit determination changes never made any sense. The ambush rule was the equivalent of holding a Presidential election but deciding whether we’re going to count the votes of Texas until after the election. Under the new modifications voters will know who is actually in their bargaining unit – before they vote! What a concept.

Two other important decisions overturn very controversial Obama-era decisions. Caesars Entertainment overturns Purple Communications and returns control of email systems back to employers. Under Purple union supporter employees were allowed to use their employer’s email system to solicit co-workers. Caesars makes clear an employer is allowed to restrict use of its email system to work-related conversations and to restrict solicitation, so long as it is done in a non-discriminatory fashion. I guess you could say they rendered unto Caesars what is Caesars (I know, groan).

The other decision is Apogee Retail which overturns Banner Estrella, the controversial (and maddening) decision that prohibited employers from making a blanket request to employees to keep workplace investigations confidential. Banner drove HR professionals (not to mention agencies like the EEOC and DOL) crazy.

Apogee provides a common-sense approach to workplace investigations. A rule asking employees to keep investigations confidential is presumptively valid, unless there is evidence that the rule is being used to infringe on Section 7 rights. This makes much more sense than the Banner approach (and creates much less confusion with other statutes and agencies who want investigations to remain confidential whenever possible).

Of interest to unionized companies, the Board also reversed the Lincoln Lutheran decision. This required employers to continue to honor dues checkoff provisions and pay dues to a union even after the contract with that clause has expired. In Valley Hospital the Board went back to the Bethlehem Steel rule that allows a company to stop deducting dues once a contract expires.

Once again, the ruling just makes sense. Requiring an employer to keep collecting dues when the contract is expired is like you stopping payments for Disney+ but then telling Disney they can’t cancel your subscription because you just started watching the Mandalorian. And often this happens when the union is threatening economic damage to the employer. Bizarre.

One other important recent development came from the General Counsel’s office. On November 20, Peter Robb sustained an appeal from the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation. The General Counsel concluded that a neutrality agreement between a hotel and Unite Here! provided “more than ministerial aid” to the union. Therefore, both the union and the company committed unfair labor practices by entering into the neutrality agreement. This is not a final ruling, but one definitely worth watching.

If the last month of 2019 is any indication, 2020 will be a big year for labor law developments. In the meantime, we wish you a peaceful and blessed holiday season. And get some rest. You’ll need to buckle your seat belts for next year!

Link & Comments

**********

Union Bailout Update

A few more details on the final Elections Rule posted by the NLRB, due to take effect April 16, 2020. The board did not completely rescind the Obama-era rule but makes fundamental changes. Changes have been made in the following areas (read article for details):

  • Pre-election hearings - extended time period
  • Notice of petition for election - more time to post
  • Statement of position - extended time for filing
  • Scope of pre-election hearing - a return to prior board procedures (pre-2014 changes)
  • Post-hearing briefs - right to file restored and extended
  • Election scheduling - “normally will not schedule an election before the 20th business day after the date of the direction of election.”
  • Pre-election requests for review - more latitude for either party to have ballots impounded
  • Voter list - extended time to provide list
  • Election observers - limited to non-supervisory employees (where possible)
  • Certification of results - a request for review will delay certification

Click here to read the PDF from the NLRB.

As a follow-up to the Alstate Maintenance decision reviewing protected concerted activity, the board provided further definition in the recent  Tschiggfrie Properties decision, clarifying the appropriate proof paradigm under Wright Line (1980). There must be direct or circumstantial evidence demonstrating that anti-union animus was a motivating factor in the adverse action at issue before the burden shifts to the employer to demonstrate the same action would have been taken in the absence of the unlawful motive.

Google, who has faced the scrutiny of the NLRB before, is now under Board investigation again for its recent firing of four employees, allegedly for involvement in union organizing activities. The company cites the handling of data in a manner against policy as the reason for the terminations.

California’s Anti-Arbitration law (A.B. 51) may not take effect on January 1 as passed in October of this year.  State and national trade groups - including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce - filed suit in California federal court, asking for a preliminary injunction. The suit argues that the state law is preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act, and asks the court to declare A.B. 51 unconstitutional.

Link & Comments

**********

Laboring Toward 2020

Canvassers for the Joe Biden campaign joined the Teamsters, adding to the list of unionized campaigns, which include Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Pete Buttigieg, and Julián Castro to date.

At the time of this writing, it remained to be seen whether tonight’s Democratic presidential debate will take place. Food service workers on the Loyola Marymount University campus are in a contract dispute with Sodexo, and all seven candidates have pledged not to cross the picket line.

Link & Comments

**********

AI, Technology, and Labor

As of today, Amazon has 200,000 mobile robots working alongside its 1.1 million employees. Though the robots have saved human stowers and pickers from having to walk 12-20 miles per day across the concrete landscape of an Amazon warehouse, the facilities with the highest injury rates are those more completely automated with robots. This stems from the unintended consequences of workers adapting their work processes to fit their interface with automation and/or robots. Something to keep in mind.

AI is increasingly coming under legal scrutiny, with HireVue’s recruiting system a recent example. Over 700 companies use HireVue’s AI-driving recruiting technology to screen applicants. The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) has filed a complaint, asking for an FTC investigation. Because the algorithms are confidential, job candidates and employers alike are unclear on the exact methodology underlying the technology’s determinations. As such, these determinations cannot be meaningfully challenged. Illinois has become the first state to impose restrictions on the use of AI in hiring practices, with the Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act. If federal action isn’t soon-coming, employers may need to navigate a patchwork of state laws.

Link & Comments

**********

Labor Solutions Corner

The research continues to reinforce the power of Approachability.  A few examples of recent studies conclude that leader approachability is associated with increases in:

  • Safety compliance behavior (by 65%);
  • Proactive employee behavior (by 76%); and
  • Positive patient outcomes (by 79%).

After rolling out the Approachable Leadership® Keynote in 2015 and the Approachable Leadership® Workshop in 2017, many of those who experienced the power of approachability asked us for more - something to extend the learning and further cement the behaviors of approachability.

In the middle of 2019, we launched a series of five additional workshops, designed to reinforce the key tenets of Approachability and the associated behaviors. Just like the flagship workshop, these new half-day experiences include 30 days of online reinforcement to continue to turn new behaviors into habits.

If you haven’t yet experienced the power of Approachability, or if you’ve been waiting for the next step in the leadership journey, don’t miss this opportunity to:

  • Reduce turnover
  • Increase engagement
  • Decrease resistance to change
  • Basically - build a better company!

Download a 3-page summary of the Approachable Leadership® Learning System with an outline of the additional workshop topics, and/or the 7-page detailed description of the Approachable Leadership® Learning System. If you haven’t read our Executive Summary (The ROI of Approachable Leaders) on how transformative Approachable Leadership can be to your company, download that here.

And look forward to a powerful 2020!

**********

Tech/Media Unions

As we reported last month, the Writers Guild of America East is looking to organize Hearst, one of the largest media companies in the country. But they may have hit a roadblock. Shortly after WGA-East’s petition to organize was filed, another organization claiming to already represent Hearst employees came out of the woodwork and filed an intervention.

The Hearst International Employees Association is the union claiming to be the representative body for company employees for the last 75 years. The NLRB is looking into it.

Meanwhile, some staffers at NBC really do not want a union — so much so that they’ve independently created websites and social media pages to get their message out.

Link & Comments

**********

Union Corruption 

The UAW scandal just keeps getting thicker. The FBI is investigating whether the fire at UAW’s Solidarity House headquarters, which started in the IT department, was arson, and if so, would be considered obstruction of justice. As late as this month, the U.S. Attorney leading the UAW investigation says that the union leadership is still not fully cooperating, and it is mostly tips from individuals that are fueling the ongoing efforts to get to the truth. A government takeover of the union is still listed as a possibility as the probe seeks to uncover the depth of the corruption.

To further complicate matters, the UAW moved to disband Region 5 (the Region at the heart of the scandal). According to UAW president Rory Gamble, the move is designed to break up the region responsible for the mess. The St. Louis-based leadership organized events over a two-year period that spent more than $1 million in union dues on “poolside villas, booze, cigars, golf and steak dinners,” much of it fraudulently expensed to the UAW accounting department.

Overshadowed by the UAW scandal, the SEIU faces a reckoning of its own after it was confirmed that SEIU leadership, including President Mary Kay Henry, failed to take action against sexual predators in the union and actually promoted some of them after their being accused of misconduct. In fact, the union is alleged to have retaliated against whistle-blowers. No action was ever taken against two high-profile SEIU leaders, Dave Regan and Martin Manteca, after multiple allegations of sexual misconduct, including a petition signed by 60 staffers against Manteca. To read the long, sordid in-depth report (if you can stomach it), click here.

Link & Comments

**********

SCORE BOARD

Since INK is coming out a week early, the strikes database hasn’t been updated by DOL.  We’ll send out the Scoreboard for December just after the first of the year.  Merry Christmas!

**********

It’s All Academic

Members of the Harvard Graduate Student Union (represented by UAW) have been on strike since December 3rd. The purpose of the strike is to move the university to bargain with the union and settle on a contract. Negotiations for HGSU’s first contract have been ongoing for 13 months. While many put the blame for this extended negotiation on the university, others are criticizing the Auto Workers for their lack of representation as well.

The university and the union were expected to meet yesterday, Dec. 18, for a three-hour bargaining session.

Link & Comments

**********

Gig Economy

New York lawmakers are proposing a bill that would allow Uber and Lyft drivers to unionize. This would essentially extend union rights to gig workers under state law. The main question here is whether the NLRB, which enforces labor law nationally, will allow it. And if so, we’re looking at a potentially major step for gig worker classification (considering the fact that current labor law requires workers to be classified as employees in order to organize).

Seattle joined New York City last month as one of the few locations that has set a minimum wage for gig economy workers. The “Fair Share” program was approved by the Seattle City Council on November 25. It adds a new tax of 51 cents per ride that is supposed to be used to help pay for the new $16 per hour minimum wage.

Meanwhile, New Jersey continues its crackdown on the misclassification of independent contractors with six new bills “increasing investigative and enforcement powers.” Read about each bill here.

And finally in our top stories on the gig economy, Spin, a scooter rental company owned by Ford, has recently completely shifted away from its gig-economy business model and now hires all workers as employees. This month, they became the first scooter company in the San Francisco Bay Area to organize its workers through card check. Now, San Fran’s Municipal Transportation Agency is reportedly requiring all scooter companies seeking permits to hire workers as employees and to pledge not to oppose unions.

Link & Comments

**********

UAW Deal Not All It’s Cracked Up To Be

Late last month, the UAW succeeding in reaching its final deal with all Big Three Automakers. While some reviews are positive, many industry experts are saying more changes should have been made.

In particular, critics of the deal say that the contracts “fall short of giving the automakers enough flexibility to retool factories or reduce labor to compete in a quickly changing world that’s headed toward electrification. And, with health care costs remaining the same, wage increases and a cap on temporary workers, pundits question the economic benefits for the automakers.”

Link & Comments

**********

Minimum Rising

Over the last few years, each New Year has brought with it state minimum wage increases. Click here to review the expected increases by state in list form, or here to view the Economic Policy Institute’s interactive Minimum Wage Tracker map.

Some other notable changes include the increase in Denver, which is happening independent of the state’s current minimum. Denver is the first city in the state to step out in this way. New York will see minimum wage increases across multiple industries (fast food included), which also correspond to workers’ location inside or outside the city. Service employees and food service workers will see an increase in the tip credit. And salary basis thresholds are also increasing in and around the city.

Lastly, the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed a case this month in which several groups and lawmakers filed suit against the Alabama state Attorney General, Steve Marshall. In 2016, Birmingham constituents voted for an increase to the city’s minimum wage. Shortly after, the state Legislature passed the Alabama Uniform Minimum Wage Act — which essentially bans minimum wage increases above the $7.25 federal minimum wage (Alabama does not have its own minimum wage). Because this law was passed before the minimum wage increases went into effect, Birmingham’s increase was effectively washed out. The 11th Circuit found that the plaintiffs improperly sued the defendants.

Link & Comments

**********

Labor Around the World

The pension strike in France has reached its fourteenth day and some of the country’s unions don’t plan to stop until they see results. The main complaint about the pension system is the governments’ plan to combine the country’s 42 pension schemes into “a single, points-based system.” Some days have included hundreds of thousands of protestors, tear gas, and arrests. Stay tuned for updates.

The walkouts over pensions at 60 universities across the UK last month weren’t quite as dramatic, but worth noting nonetheless. Striking faculty included more than 40,000 lecturers, technicians, librarians and support staff. The walkout lasted for eight days.

Also in the UK, an article in TechWorld proposes the potential of digital organizing tools as a means to “rejuvenate Britain’s trade unions.” The first effort at this came out in 2017 in the form of an app called Worksmart. So far, it has seen little success, but it includes features like translating labor law materials from the gov.uk website “into more comprehensible language” and incorporating quizzes that essentially take the temperature of workforces across industries.

Link & Comments

**********

Sticky Fingers

Current charges or sentences of embezzling union officials:

  • George Laufenberg - UBC:  $1,500,000
  • James Moyan - IBEW:  $49,000
  • Dana Quinn Roush - APWU:  $10,089

http://nlpc.org/index.php?q=union-corruption-update

**********

Labor Relations INK is published semi-weekly and is edited by Labor Relations Institute, Inc. Feel free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you think might enjoy it.

New subscribers can sign up by visiting: http://lrionline.com/free-stuff/newsletter-signup/

If you use content from this newsletter please attribute it to Labor Relations Institute and include our website address: http://www.LRIonline.com

Contributing editors for this issue: Phillip Wilson, Greg Kittinger, and Meghan Jones

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to receive our labor relations newsletters and updates. You can manage your email preferences by clicking the link at the bottom of any of our email communications.

NOTE: if you are using older versions of Internet Explorer, read the text version, as the html may not load properly. We recommend upgrading to the latest version.

The post Labor Relations INK December 2019 appeared first on Labor Relations Institute.

Labor Relations INK January 2020

$
0
0

In this issue:

  • Great news for our healthcare readers!
  • The Most Powerful Labor Organizing Tool of 2019
  • UAW President Rory Gamble Denies Involvement in Corruption Scandal
  • AI Impacting White Collar Jobs
  • Scoreboard, Insight, Sticky Fingers and more…

The bottom of each story contains a link to the individual post on our site.

Labor Relations Insight  By Phil Wilson

Resolution or Revolution?

Did you make any New Year’s resolutions as you kicked off the new decade? For the first time in a long time I didn’t. I’m not really sure why. Partially it could be that so many resolutions don’t make it to February. But I’ve made many that stuck over the years, so I don’t think that’s it.

Instead it may be a shift in my thinking overall. LRI just celebrated our 40th birthday on January 11. We had a great celebration of our first 40 years with our current team, many former teammates, and numerous consulting partners (with many others there in spirit). It was a great way to cap off an incredible 40-year run my Dad started back in 1980.

The celebration also provided an opportunity for us to begin planning LRI’s next 40 years. Over the last couple of months of 2019, we’ve done a lot of work on our own organization. This includes a reorganized leadership team and new strategic process. As we kick off a new decade, I’ve never been more excited about the direction of our company.

Our strategic work included a lot of reflection on what made us successful over the first 40 years. Part of that was clearly articulating our core values. I know what you’re thinking – that’s what I usually think when somebody mentions core values. But the process we went through was very meaningful and I’d like to share it with you.

We began with this distinction: you don’t come up with core values, they are there all along. Our core values started with my Dad in a one-room office in front of a self-storage business in 1980. As he added team members and changed locations those core values continued to drive everything we did. All we did was describe the values that were already there.

The way we went about describing the values was interesting. We started by listing people – current teammates, former team members, and consulting partners – who we felt like best represented what LRI stands for and what made us successful during our first 40 years. Once we had that list, we started describing the things that made those individuals stand out.

After a lot of spirited discussion and debate, we boiled those behaviors down to these six: integrity, excellence, show up and step up, help others, teamwork, and lead. None of these are surprising or revolutionary. But these are our DNA. They set us apart. They make us successful. We slip up sometimes, but this is who we are. And I guarantee that clearly articulating these behaviors – and holding each other accountable to them – will revolutionize LRI.

I shared a document describing our DNA at the 40th anniversary party. I wanted to share it with our clients and readers.

Again, we’ve lived these core values for 40 years. That’s not the revolution. What is different is our commitment to live these values with intention. We are now going through every aspect of what we do, from the consulting services we deliver, the products and information we offer, the people we add to our team, and even the clients we work with, using these principles. That’s what is revolutionary.

We hope you’ll be with us for our next 40 years!

Link and Comments Here

**********

Union Bailout Update

Several NLRB decisions at the end of the year reversed several Obama-era Board actions, returning issues to previous long-standing interpretations of the National Labor Relations Act. Among them were:

  • Apogee Retail addressed employer confidentiality during investigations, restoring standards on par with other Federal agencies
  • Caesars Entertainment overturned Purple Communications, and returned the control of a company’s email system back to the company, allowing the restriction of email systems, as long as Section 7 rights are not singled out
  • Valley Hospital determined that union dues checkoff ends at the expiration of a collective bargaining agreement

The Board also signaled an intent to overturn Obama-era rules on union access to employer property, returning reasonable restrictions that had existed for almost 40 years.

The long anticipated Joint Employer Rule was handed down in mid-January. In the final rule, the department provides a four-factor balancing test for determining FLSA joint employer status in situations where an employee performs work for one employer that simultaneously benefits another entity or individual. The balancing test examines whether the potential joint employer:

  • Hires or fires the employee;
  • Supervises and controls the employee’s work schedule or conditions of employment to a substantial degree;
  • Determines the employee’s rate and method of payment; and
  • Maintains the employee’s employment records.

The final rule will be effective 60 days after its publication on January 16th.

The Board signaled in an unpublished case that it intends to adopt a new test which would expand what constitutes effective recommendation of discipline, widening the definition of who qualifies as a supervisor.  Bloomsburg Care and Rehabilitation Center reviewed the authority of Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), holding that they were not supervisors. The Board agreed with a Regional Director in this case, while disagreeing with the test used, and citing the Third Circuit’s 2017 holding in NLRB v. New Vista Nursing and Rehabilitation, suggesting a more useful test. All that’s needed now is an appropriate case to come before the board.

In United Parcel Service, Inc., the Board reversed yet another Obama-era Board ruling - the 2014 Babcock & Wilcox Construction Co, Inc. – and reinstated the legal standard for deferring to the arbitration process to the prior standard.

In the largest monetary remedy in the history of the NLRB, CNN has agreed to pay $76 million in backpay to benefit over 300 individuals. It took 17 years from the time CNN severed a contract with unionized Team Video Services in 2003, for the case to wind its way through an administrative law judge, the NLRB, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, to finally be resolved through the Board’s Alternative Dispute Resolution program.

Link and Comments Here

**********

Laboring Toward 2020

All of the Democrat contenders present at a recent labor convention in Iowa, of course, pandered to Big Labor. Bernie Sanders touted his plan to double union membership by the end of his first term. However, in contrast to the 2016 primaries, unions in Sanders neighboring state of New Hampshire are not buying it and have abstained from endorsing him. The exception is SEA/SEIU Local 1984, who decided to back Sanders even though SEIU International is still on the sidelines. In contrast, Elizabeth Warren just scored the endorsement of 60 union leaders and members from the granite state.

For Elizabeth Warren, the USMCA trade agreement has her in a bind. Though her vote is unlikely to affect the outcome of the agreement, if she supports it she risks angering key constituents in swing states, and if she opposes it she is going against her party leadership and the AFL-CIO.

Link and Comments Here

**********

AI, Technology, and Labor

AI and automation (robotics) are typically lumped into a single category of “technology,” especially in terms of impact on jobs. Though unions rail against both as a cause of blue-collar job reductions, it is becoming increasingly clear that the two types of technology affect jobs differently. A recent report by The Brookings Institution indicates that artificial intelligence implementation usually impacts white collar jobs such as market research analysts and marketing specialists, sales managers, computer programmers and personal financial advisors.

Link and Comments Here

**********

SCORE BOARD

Who are the winners (and losers) of the labor movement? Don’t guess, just check the LRI Scoreboard

View this month’s scoreboard (archives also located here).

Download a PDF of this month’s scoreboard

**********

Labor Solutions Corner

See the entry below under Healthcare for news about our new healthcare edition of INK!

If you just can’t wait, take a look at our healthcare page:

https://lrionline.com/healthcare/

**********

Tech/Media Unions

The Communication Workers of America have announced a new campaign that will focus on organizing the tech and video game industry. It’s called the Campaign to Organize Digital Employees and it launched at the beginning of the year. Check out the campaign’s website here.

Also this month, a majority of newsroom staff at Sports Illustrated signed union cards declaring their intention to organize with the CWA.

At Google, around 2,300 contracted cafeteria workers have voted to unionize with a local chapter of Unite HERE. This came around the same time that a fifth former employee filed a complaint that she was fired for her attempts to organize within the company.

Link and Comments Here

**********

Healthcare

Great news for our healthcare readers!

Because healthcare is now the largest employment sector in the U.S. and is expected to add over two million jobs in the next decade, unions have stepped up their attack on healthcare employers, but that’s NOT the good news.  LRI is bringing new focus and resources to your business! 

Lori King is a national nurse leader with subject matter expertise in labor relations, and has joined our team. Her expertise with nurses and unions will be invaluable to your labor relations team.

We are also moving our healthcare related news from this edition of INK to a new quarterly healthcare newsletter, to begin in the second quarter of this year, with Lori providing solid editorial content along with our usual survey of labor news and events specific to healthcare.

Lori has already written a paper on nurse-to-patient ratios which you can secure on this page:  https://lrionline.com/healthcare/. Read a bit more about Lori, download the paper and sign up for INK Healthcare there. By signing up for the newsletter, you’ll also receive occasional breaking news emails pertaining specifically to healthcare. As always we will keep these to a minimum, as we respect the frantic pace of working in your industry.

Thanks to all our healthcare readers!  Your commitment to a tumultuous industry makes life better for all of us!

**********

The Most Powerful Labor Organizing Tool of 2019

A google spreadsheet. (Wait - what?)

Young workers seem to be currently disillusioned with capitalism - a recent Gallop poll showed a tie with socialism - but they also don’t seem to want to rely on organized labor alone and are taking matters into their own hands. It started in the art world. A museum curator started a crowdsourced list of salaries and benefits in a Google spreadsheet that eventually totaled more than 2500 anonymous entries. Inspired by the effort, baristas in more than a dozen cities followed suit, as did groups of journalists, ad agency staffers, and public interest lawyers.

In some situations, the activity resulted in pay increases but no union organizing effort, but in other cases took a turn toward unionization.

Link and Comments Here

**********

Union Corruption

George Laufenberg, former benefit funds administrator for the United Brotherhood of Carpenters, has been indicted for fraud and stealing more than $1.5 million in dues-funded plan assets.

Meanwhile, new UAW President, Rory Gamble, released a letter this month denying involvement in the organization’s ongoing corruption scandal.

Link and Comments Here

**********

It’s All Academic

After a 27-day strike, the Harvard Graduate Student Union went back to work at the beginning of this month. The union, university, and a federal mediator have continued to meet for bargaining sessions since the end of the strike, but have yet to come to an agreement regarding any of the major contract provisions.

Over at the University of Chicago, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled this month that the university must recognize student library workers’ collective bargaining efforts. Student library workers voted to unionize in June of 2017.

Link and Comments Here

**********

Gig Economy

California’s controversial AB 5 bill, which imposes the country’s strictest standards for determining whether or not an employee can be classified as a contractor, went into effect this month. Still, some gig companies and industries aren’t ready to throw in the towel.

Uber and Postmates filed a suit against the state of California alleging that the new law is unconstitutional; and a month before that, a federal judge in the state granted a temporary injunction that blocks the new law from impacting more than 70,000 independent truckers.

Meanwhile, the US Chamber of Commerce Employment Policy Division has published an article entitled, “Ready, Fire, Aim: How State Regulators Are Threatening the Gig Economy and Millions of Workers and Consumers.” Check it out here.

Link and Comments Here

**********

Union Pension Turmoil

Union pension funds continue to struggle. News of late includes:

  • The American Federation of Musicians and Employers’ Pension fund, which covers approximately 50,000 people, is expected to run out of money within 20 years and is seeking to cut benefits.
  • Congress and the President have passed a measure to redirect taxpayer funds in an effort to save the dwindling United Mine Workers Pension Fund.
  • Police unions in Winnipeg, Canada are seeking $3 million in damages from the city over pension changes.

Link and Comments Here

**********

Logistics/Manufacturing

The Center for Automotive Research punched some numbers and found that the new four-year contracts (negotiated last year) between the UAW and Big Three automakers will increase labor costs for US companies an average of $8 to $11 per hour. Meanwhile, foreign-owned factories are only expected to see a $2 increase.

Link and Comments Here

**********

Minimum Rising

New York Governor, Andrew Cuomo, issued an order last month announcing that by December 31, 2020, tipped workers will receive the minimum wage regardless of how much they make in tips. This will affect more than 70,000 tipped workers in the state, including hairdressers, nail salon employees, valet parking attendants, etc. It will not, however, include restaurant workers which, according to restaurant worker groups, is a good thing.

And a little further south, a measure to raise the state minimum wage to $15 per hour has officially made the ballot in Florida for November.

Link and Comments Here

**********

Labor Around the World

By the time the USMCA was approved by the House, most labor unions, and the AFL-CIO, were on board with the deal. The United Food and Commercial Workers Union (UFCW), however, still has a bone to pick — but not with who you’d think.

After the passage of the USMCA, UFCW put out a news release criticizing Canadian ranchers for not fighting to keep Country of Origin Labelling (COOL) requirements as a part of the deal. The UFCWs’ primary argument is that, “Keeping this information hidden endangers our health and destroys middle class meat processing jobs across our country.”

This is a big issue for the Canadian beef industry, who fought hard against COOL legislation and “reported losses of $640 million per year the last time the Americans imposed the labelling requirements before they were repealed in 2015.” The UFCW doesn’t plan on letting this go any time soon.

Early this month, India saw millions of workers go on strike to protest the Hindu nationalist government’s economic policy, “especially the planned sale of several state-owned companies.”

In other international news, a recent New York Times article lays out how the European Union is inadvertently funding forced labor in Eritrea, a country in Africa. Read the article here.

Link and Comments Here

**********

Sticky Fingers

  • Douglas Dye – UAW: $8,443
  • Glenn Blicht – ILWU: $150,000
  • Angel Luis Garcia – ATU: $117,000
  • Jessica Pangburn – IUOE: wire fraud
  • Rocky Gannon – AFGE: wire fraud and forgery

Current charges or sentences of embezzling union officials:

http://nlpc.org/index.php?q=union-corruption-update

The post Labor Relations INK January 2020 appeared first on Labor Relations Institute.


Labor Relations Ink February 2020

$
0
0

In this issue:

  • Revisioning of Labor Law
  • Did Chino Valley nurses make gains in their new contract?
  • Janus Ruling Effects Political Spending
  • Insight, Sticky Fingers, Scoreboard and more…

The bottom of each story contains a link to the individual post on our site.

**********

Labor Relations Insight by Phil Wilson

Is the PRO Act a Mate in One?

This week the NLRB issued its highly anticipated rulemaking on joint employer, overruling the controversial Browning Ferris decision. If you haven’t read through the 53-page final rule (and why would you – that’s what you’ve got me for) here are the highlights:

  • A business is a joint employer of another employer’s employees only if the two employers share or codetermine the essential terms and conditions of employment (defined as wages, benefits, hours of work, hiring, discharge, discipline, supervision, and direction);
  • To be a joint employer a business must possess and exercise substantial direct and immediate control over one or more essential terms and conditions of employment of another employer’s employees;
  • Indirect and contractually reserved – but never exercised – control over essential terms and conditions (and control over mandatory subjects of bargaining that aren’t essential terms and conditions) may be used as evidence of joint-employer status but cannot by itself prove joint employer status.

This thoughtful rule is the next salvo in the years-long battle over defining who counts as an employer under our labor laws. It will certainly be litigated, and it sets up a number of potential showdowns with states, administrative law judges, and other agencies. But it is a critical development (along with the Department of Labor’s rule issued in January). It provides much more clarity, especially for franchisors and gig economy companies who faced having their entire business model destroyed.

Up till now the joint employer issue has bounced around in a series of agency and court decisions, which get reversed when a new administration comes into power. This political back-and-forth is extremely frustrating for employers and their employees alike. For example, numerous groups of freelancers and so-called gig workers are suing to block California’s AB-5 statute from going into effect. That’s why the Ring Board should be applauded for getting these rules through and clarifying this critical issue.

Here is the problem. It’s true that a rulemaking is more difficult to reverse than an agency decision. However, it is far from impossible, as the Ring Board recently showed by rewriting the “ambush election” rule originally put in place by the Obama-era Board. While the playing field has shifted somewhat away from decisions and toward rulemaking, the game is being played basically the same. Each time the administration changes they just flip everything back to the way it was before. Rinse, lather, repeat.

Photo by Anne Nygård on Unsplash

You’ve probably heard the saying that most people play checkers, but the most strategic ones play chess. In other words, checkers doesn’t require as much strategy or thinking ahead. You’re mostly just reacting to the last move of your opponent. When I think about the state of labor law today, I think both sides usually play checkers. Move, countermove.

However, Big Labor and their Democrat allies are playing chess when it comes to the PRO Act. Labor unions know they missed the best opportunity in a generation to revolutionize US labor law when the completely mis-named (but also cleverly named) Employee Free Choice Act nearly passed in 2009. They are now betting it all on the PRO Act, which has already passed the House. The PRO Act is literally every bad idea unions have come up with in the last 40 years to re-shape labor law in their favor. In addition to overturning the joint employer rulemaking, it includes card-check, gives unions access to company property, mandates arbitration of bargaining agreements and much, much more. This bill is going nowhere in 2020, but it has a significant chance of passing should the Presidency and US Senate flip in November.

The PRO Act or its key provisions are supported by every current Democratic candidate for the presidency. Big Labor has made clear that support for the PRO Act is a litmus test for their support in any political election. While hitting the trifecta may be a long shot, it is not impossible. We are in a completely different political environment. Sure, a Sanders presidency and a Senate flip is hard to imagine, but is it any less probable than a Trump presidency was 4 years ago? I don’t think so.

I love playing chess. If you’ve ever played (and even if you don’t know anything about chess) you probably know that a checkmate is the goal of the game – using a combination of your pieces to put the king in a position where it can’t move. A “mate in one” is where you can move one piece to deliver mate. To deliver a mate in one you have to position your pieces in a way that that last piece can deliver the crushing blow without being captured.

I look at the PRO Act this year as Big Labor and the Democrats moving their pieces around to prepare to deliver a mate in one. Gathering up the House co-sponsors (and going after those who oppose the legislation) and getting all the presidential candidates on board is the first step. Making clear that they learned the lessons of EFCA is another move. Unions have withheld full-throated support for Joe Biden in part because they felt the Obama administration fought for healthcare instead of EFCA.

The most important lesson employers should have learned from EFCA was how fast it went from bad idea that had no shot of passing to nearly becoming law. And with the Democrat presidential candidates debating on whether or not to get rid of the filibuster rule in the Senate (the only thing that prevented EFCA from passing in 2009) it is more likely than ever that a major piece of labor legislation could pass soon.

The only way to prevent a one move mate is to make sure you take away your opponent’s resources. You put obstacles in the way. You counter-attack. You move your king to safety. These are moves you have to make way in advance. Once the final attacker is in position it is too late to stop the mate – it’s inevitable. If the business community wants any hope of stopping the PRO Act then businesses must be making moves now. Right now I only see Big Labor making chess moves – the business community is still playing checkers.

Link & Comments

**********

Union Bailout Update

The NLRB released several Advice Memoranda at the end of January, going back several years and addressing a range of topics. Due to the age of many of the memoranda, several of the issues addressed have since been outdated by further actions of the Board or the courts, but they still contain much useful insight into the reasoning of the Board. The detail is too much to list in this format, so if any of the following catch your eye, read the details here:

  • Employer arbitration agreements must not prohibit filing of Board charges.
  • Some blanket workplace investigation confidentiality rules are categorically lawful.
  • Employers must maintain and disclose information responsive to certain union requests.
  • Employer should have pre-disclosed to union its intent to sell certain portions of its business.
  • Employer’s rule limiting employee involvement in Board of Directors election considered lawful, while rule limiting employee complaints to the Board of Directors was not.
  • Employer violates NLRA by refusing to hire union members.
  • Exhaustion of union remedies lawful, but perhaps should not be.
  • Employers cannot deduct union dues without specific, express authorization.

One of the disadvantages of unionized workforces is the loss of flexibility. Another recent advice memo from the Board highlights a strategy for proposed language in collective bargaining agreements that may allow for more flexibility.

The Board split a few hairs on Argos USA, LLC, addressing confidentiality policies as a confirmation of the 2017 Boeing decision regarding handbook policies. In Argos, the Board clarified that a company could protect “confidential” information such as “earnings” and “employee information,” while defining those terms as company earnings and company staffing information - and not wage or contact information.

Argos also allowed restrictions on cell phone use, specifically when controlled for safety reasons, and upheld the barring of employee use of email systems for personal purposes.

Ten years after Oregon passed a state law banning employers from forcing employees to attend captive audience meetings, the NLRB has finally filed a complaint in U.S. District Court in Portland. Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum rebuffed a November letter from the Boards General Counsel asking for help in resolving the conflict.

A good lesson learned in the Boards recent ruling upholding an employer’s denial to provide certain information requested by a union. In such cases, simply rejecting the request usually results in the filing of a unfair labor practice. However, by inquiring about the reasons for the request, the Board has shown that the union must have reasons beyond suspicion that the information might be relevant for the company to be compelled to comply.

As expected, the House passed the PROAct by a 224-193 vote early this month. An evolution of the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) that narrowly missed becoming law, the PROAct isn’t likely to gain traction in the Senate – at least not in 2020…

The White House has signaled its picks for the NLRB, reappointing Marvin Kaplan (R) and former board member Lauren McFarran (D) for new five-year terms. There is still a seat vacant for which no appointment has been suggested.

Link & Comments

**********

Laboring Toward 2020

Biden’s support of the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) puts him at odds with Big Labor, while union support for Bernie Sanders is snowballing.  Although the international unions have been slow to pick a favorite, many local, regional and statewide unions are jumping on the Bernie bandwagon, and he has amassed more union backers than any other candidate. Warren has scared up a few endorsements, while Buttigieg is still a goose-egg in this particular race.

In push-back against non-representative endorsement, more than 1,200 members of the IBEW signed a letter blasting the IBEW national leadership for endorsing a candidate rather than allowing members to endorse their own favorites, and asking the union to retract its endorsement of Joe Biden. The signers of the letter prefer to endorse Sanders.

Meanwhile, the American Federation of Teachers is hedging its bets by encouraging involvement of its local membership in campaign work for either Biden, Warren or Sanders.

Link & Comments

**********

Revisioning of Labor Law

The Clean Slate for Worker Power is the most recent liberal revisioning of labor law. This effort was spearheaded by former NLRB member Sharon Block and Harvard professor Benjamin Sachs, and hosted by Harvard Law School. If you’re up for some heavy reading, download their 132-page agenda.

Link & Comments

**********

Healthcare

Did Chino Valley nurses make gains in their new contract?  by Lori King

 

On December 12 Chino Valley Medical Center nurses ratified their first union contract. Prior to the ratification, the hospital and nurses suffered through several months of contentious negotiations – requiring mediation, an informational picket in August, and a 3-day strike in October. In reports, the strike was due to the Nurses asking for a 3% pay raise and the employer offering 2.5%. Nurses said the hospital’s offer was not enough to address high turnover rates due to low market pay.

A thirty-thousand foot view of this situation prompts some key questions. What did nurses really gain in bringing a union to represent them? What could the hospital have done differently to avoid this situation?

Continue reading the full article here…

Sign up for the quarterly INK/Healthcare newsletter here.

Link & Comments

**********

Tech + Media Unions

The staff at crowdfunding platform Kickstarter voted to join the Office and Professional Employees Union this month, making it one of the first tech companies to opt into a representative labor relationship.

Meanwhile, executives at Hearst Magazines sat down for the first time with the union organizing committee looking to gain representation for hundreds of Hearst employees across 24 brands. This is a significant shift in Hearst’s approach since learning of its employees’ intention to organize back in November.

Link & Comments

**********

Labor Solutions Corner

The 2019 Elections Review is out!  Our annual report from our data libraries contains the charts and graphs you’ve come to expect from LRI RightNow, including:

  • Representative (RC) and Decertification (RD) Elections Summaries
  • Most Active Unions in RC & RD Elections
  • Elections per NLRB Region
  • Elections per State
  • Elections per Industry
  • Elections per Unit Size
  • Top 10 Unions in Certification Elections 5-year History (Only available on the Annual Review)
  • Top 10 Unions in Decertification Elections 5-year History (Only available on the annual Review)

Get the information you need.  Click here to order.

**********

Union Corruption

One former UAW employee is suing the union for forcing him to pay dues to a local that he was not even a part of; and furthermore, that he’s not even sure exists as an actual representative unit. More here.

This kind of organizational leadership is no doubt at the source of a current UAW member uprising.

Many UAW members are pushing for a one-member, one-vote process for electing union leaders. The current process involves member-elected delegates from each local who then go on to elect the international leaders. This is the second time in 30 years that UAW members have attempted to change the election process within the organization.

Currently, eight former UAW leaders are in the process of being expelled from the organization for their involvement in the FCA scandal.

Vance Pearson

Vance Pearson, former head of UAW’s Region 5, pleaded guilty this month to conspiring with fellow union leaders to siphon hundreds of millions of dollars in dues money to support personal luxuries. Also, Norwood Jewell began his 15-month sentence for his involvement in the same scheme.

In other union corruption news:

  • This was a big month for the Teamsters as February 17th marked the end of more than 30 years of government oversight and involvement in the organization’s internal affairs. Oversight began in 1989 after the union’s pattern of corrupt behavior came to light under the RICO Act.
  • One independent union finally got justice five years after its president was accused of embezzling nearly $800,000. Former United Industrial Services Workers of America President John S. Romero has been found guilty of all charges.
  • Check out the top ten union corruption stories of 2019 here.

Link & Comments

**********

Janus Ruling Effects Political Spending

Within the first year of Janus, 33 percent of Oregon’s state employees and over 40 percent of home care workers represented by SEIU 503 have chosen to opt out of dues deduction. In effect, the union’s 2019 LM-2 shows a drop in political spending for the year of more than 60 percent (pre-Janus). Coincidence?

Link & Comments

**********

It’s All Academic

Back in 2012, adjunct professors at Duquesne University (a Catholic institution) voted to join the Steelworkers Union. Since then, the university has refused to bargain based on its status as a religious institution, which exempts them from NLRB jurisdiction. At the time, the NLRB did not acknowledge this as justification to forgo bargaining — a decision to which the university appealed.

Nearly a decade later, a federal appeals court has finally ruled in favor of Duquesne.

Link & Comments

**********

Gig Economy

Uber and Postmates lost another round in the fight against AB5, California’s law designed to reclassify gig-economy workers from contractor to employee status.  A U.S. District Judge for the Central District of California rejected a motion for preliminary injunction against the law.

California is not the only state ramping up the attack on independent contractors.  New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy recently signed five bills aimed at addressing misclassification of workers. The five bills address:

  • Increased penalties and fines (A5839)
  • Access to tax information by the NJ Department of Labor and Workforce Development (A5842)
  • The issuance of Stop Work Orders if not in compliance (A5838)
  • Increased Scope of Liability, including by an “officer, director, or manager” (A5840)
  • Posting requirements and significant anti-retaliation provision (A5843)

Meanwhile, Meijer is tapping into the gig economy to create flexibility to meet shifting demand. They have deployed the Hyer platform/app across its 246-store system. The Hyer app is a task app similar to TaskRabbit that allows people to accept assignments for discreet tasks. It is unclear just how broadly Meijer is relying on gig workers using Hyer to handle workload versus full-time employees, but it is an interesting use of a gig-economy platform.

On the flip side of the coin, Instacart workers in Skokie, IL voted to unionize. Although the majority of the Silicon Valley app’s members are independent contractors, 12,000 of them are Instacart employees known as “in-store” shoppers. They are capped at 29 hours per week and thus do not qualify for health benefits.

Instacart workers have had a contentious history with the company recently, as tip and bonus structures have been modified, provoking a 3-day national strike last November.

Link & Comments

**********

SCORE BOARD

Who are the winners (and losers) of the labor movement? Don’t guess, just check the LRI Scoreboard.

View this month’s scoreboard (archives also located here).

Download a PDF of this month’s scoreboard

**********

Minimum Rising

Walmart has gradually been raising its minimum wage for employees over the last five years. In 2015, it went up to $10 an hour. In 2018, it moved to $11 an hour. Now, the company is reportedly raising the pay of certain staff associates in a select number of locations to $12.

The company has made no official announcement that it intends to increase minimum wage to $12 across the board. However, many believe these increases may be the first step in that direction.

Link & Comments

**********

Right-to-Work

Tennessee lawmakers are looking to indoctrinate the state’s right to work law into its constitution via a constitutional amendment. Of the 27 states with right to work laws, 9 have put the provisions into their constitutions, making it significantly more difficult to reverse the rule in the future. Should the law make it through the State Senate, it will be put to voters in 2021.

Meanwhile in Virginia, the exact opposite is happening. Lawmakers are debating a repeal of the state’s right to work legislation.

In Kentucky, one UPS employee is appealing his case against Teamsters Local 215 bosses — whom he claims continued to deduct membership dues after multiple attempts by the employee to end dues deduction. Kentucky is a right to work state.

Link & Comments

**********

Labor Around the World

French President Macron

One month from now, France will finally be able to put a pin in one of the biggest controversies the country has faced of late. That is, French President Emmanuel Macron’s attempt to eliminate the country’s 42 pension schemes and merge them into one. The Lower House of Parliament is expected to vote on the issue in mid-March; and if it passes, the transition will occur in the summer.

Macron’s three years in office have quickly become known as some of the most turbulent and transitional years in any of France’s recent Presidential tenures. Much of it stems from his major overhauling of the country’s labor and financial systems — all actions that have received massive responses from his citizenship.

Link & Comments

**********

Sticky Fingers

Current charges or sentences of embezzling union officials:

  • Nathan Lum – ILWU: $300,000
  • Chandra Miller – IATSE: $5,000
  • Chad Waldoch – SMART: $107,706
  • Beverly Davis and Evelyn Smith – CWA: $135,000
  • Keith Ludlum – UFCW: $200,000

http://nlpc.org/index.php?q=union-corruption-update

The post Labor Relations Ink February 2020 appeared first on Labor Relations Institute.

Labor Relations Ink March 2020

$
0
0

In this issue:

  • Unions Capitalizing On CoVid-19
  • Laboring Toward 2020
  • Union Corruption
  • Scoreboard, Insight, Sticky Fingers and more…

The bottom of each story contains a link to the individual post on our site.

**********

Labor Relations Insight by Phil Wilson

What a difference a month makes!

What a difference a month makes. Many of you are reading this sheltering in place somewhere in the US. I write this as I shelter in place at home in Oklahoma, where the COVID-19 crisis is taking hold. I am very grateful that my family (including my extended LRI family) is, as of now, healthy and safe. I hope yours is as well.

Companies around the country are scrambling to react to this unprecedented crisis. Healthcare workers on the front lines are absolute heroes and heroines in a crisis situation (here are some great tips if you want to help). Many others are risking their health to keep essential services available, including first responders, grocery and pharmacy employees, food and package delivery workers, manufacturers producing essential goods such as protective gear, and many, many others.

Non-essential businesses are scrambling as well, doing all they can to keep people employed as long as possible. Re-working their businesses to accommodate remote working and taking sick time off with pay whenever possible. The government is also working furiously to provide ways for businesses and individuals to weather this crisis and keep people working as long as possible.

Unfortunately, even during this unprecedented crisis, unions are taking full advantage of the situation. They are pressuring the NLRB to begin conducting elections immediately using mail ballots and telephone hearings. Organizers continue to meet with employees and file petitions even while the NLRB has postponed all elections out of safety concerns for its staff and the employees who will vote in elections. Late last night they negotiated into the $2 trillion stimulus package a commitment that mid-sized employers who take out loans must remain neutral in union organizing elections during the term of that loan.

At the same time unions are taking every opportunity to bash employers and the government – both represented employers and direct relationship ones – for any perceived faults, such as lack of Personal Protective Equipment. Never mind that these are problems worldwide and that union representation can do exactly nothing to fix them. They are also encouraging walkouts and wildcat strikes and objecting to telework provisions not in current labor agreements; they are affirmatively making things worse. Further, unions are filing massive information requests with companies, creating additional strain on staff who are scrambling to react to a crisis and keep their teams safe and healthy.

Unions are also taking credit for anything positive that happens during this crisis:

  • Got a wage increase? We did that!
  • Got sick pay? We did that!
  • Got a check from the government? We did that?
  • Got unemployment pay? We did that!

Look, I recognize that union lobbying has added things to these packages, just as lobbying from businesses and other interest groups has shaped the packages. But these things are happening in an unprecedented bipartisan fashion (last night’s stimulus package passed unanimously – let that sink in).

Unions taking a victory lap in a situation like this is unconscionable. But that’s just par for the course. And employers – even though they are consumed with responding to the crisis and keeping employees as safe and healthy as possible – must at the same time make sure they are not sitting back and letting unions campaign unopposed during this crisis. Here are some practical things you can be doing right now:

  1. Look for the silver lining: There is no shortage of terrible news today. We are in a crisis, and it’s likely you’re already communicating at a pace like never before. Much of that is the “need-to-know” information about how the operation is responding to the crisis and protecting the team. Make sure to also take a brief moment to reflect on the positive things that come out of situations like this. The importance of your mission. Being community-minded and taking care of others. Highlighting examples of taking care of each other. Becoming closer as a team. This disease has caused so much pain and so much suffering all over the world – it is important as leaders to ensure the team is also reflecting on ways this experience can make us better and stronger when the pain is over; and it will eventually be over.
  2. Counter union messaging: Unions are continuing to organize, and they are taking full advantage of the pause in union elections to continue to build support and plant the seeds of future elections. If your company is a target of organizing it is important to counter these messages. This is doubly true for companies that currently have postponed elections or where unions are visibly organizing (holding meetings, hand-billing, etc.). While this activity is shameful – adding additional distraction at a time when people should be focused on serving others and staying healthy – that’s what’s happening and will continue to happen. Think carefully about what you can do now to counter these messages. When employees express frustration with the unwelcome interruption of union organizers be sure to acknowledge and empathize with that frustration. Ask organizers to stand down during the crisis. If they refuse, continue to communicate with workers virtually. The same tools you are using to run your business remotely can easily be deployed to continue training and communications.
  3. Prepare for the return to the “new normal”: The other key work you can do today is to prepare for the period when we get back to the “new normal,” whatever that is. Scenario plan for elections to be held by mail ballot and for limits (and perhaps bans) on group meetings. Train managers now on the things they’ll need to know when campaigns start back up. Figure out what you will do if your company ends up under a neutrality provision (there are many valuable things to communicate even under a neutrality agreement). Anticipate the campaign messages unions will use to persuade your workforce. Many of our companies are in a holding pattern at the moment, but the moves you make today will position you for success (or failure) when the world turns back around.

Rest assured that we are here to help. Even while the labor relations world has been put on “pause” we continue to work relentlessly to serve our clients. We will continue to monitor things and update you when we think that’s helpful. If you have any questions at all about your specific situation I encourage you to contact us. We are also planning a number of virtual meetings where clients can share experience and compare notes about what they are going through during these unprecedented times. And most importantly, especially for those folks on the front-lines of this crisis, please stay safe and healthy and take care of each other.

Link & Comments Here

**********

Union Bailout Update

All NLRB elections have been suspended through at least April 3rd, including mail ballots. The Board noted that it will monitor the situation and potentially extend the postponement.

As we notified you on March 24th, the Board announced that it is pushing the effective date of the new union election rules to June 1.

In addition to most regional board employees working remotely, there are top-level vacancies at more than half of the regional offices. The board’s regional workforce has seen an 11% drop from 2017 levels and a 27% decrease since 2011. Meanwhile, the board has improved its case processing time 17.5%, nearly meeting its goal of a 20% reduction by 2022 in just one year.

Link & Comments Here

**********

Laboring Toward 2020

Who does Big Labor want for a candidate?  The current approximate tally stands at 26 union endorsements for Bernie Sanders against 11 for Joe Biden.  Biden currently holds the majority of delegates, and folks are beginning to wonder how much longer Sanders will stay in the race.

As usual, unions game the system to get around contribution limits to candidates, and the SEIU seems to have written the playbook.  If you want details on how they do so, this article provides a good example.

Speaking of the SEIU, the militant union in typical fashion has pledged $150 million of worker’s dues to the Democrat Presidential candidate.  Even SEIU admits that up to 20% of its membership are conservative (and that is probably a very conservative estimate).

Link & Comments Here

**********

SCORE BOARD

Who are the winners (and losers) of the labor movement? Don’t guess, just check the LRI Scoreboard

View this month’s scoreboard (archives also located here).

Download a PDF of this month’s scoreboard

**********

Union Corruption

Former USW President Gary Jones

The hammer finally fell on Gary Jones, former President of the UAW, as federal prosecutors charged the disgraced union leader with plotting to embezzle over $1 million in the widespread scandal.

Ironically, just as the Teamsters finally emerged from three decades of federal oversight, a similar federal takeover of the UAW is being considered as an option in an attempt to clean out the “culture of corruption and greed” rampant in the organization.

Rome Aloise

One wonders if the Feds were a bit hasty in releasing the Teamsters from oversight, as a report by Teamsters Independent Investigations Officer, Joseph diGenova, charges that Teamster boss Rome Aloise continued to exert control over union affairs in unethical and possibly criminal ways during a supposed two-year suspension from Teamster leadership. Aloise is a Bay Area local leader as well as an Executive Vice President of the International union, who was suspended in December 2017 for a host of allegations.

Meanwhile, the Border Patrol Union is missing half a million dollars from its coffers. While rumors of a massive embezzlement scheme have been circulating among the El Paso local staff since 2018, union President Brandon Judd told agents in November of last year that there is an open investigation, confirming, “we expect there will be indictments.”

Link & Comments Here

**********

It’s All Academic

Fifty-four graduate assistants received an unwelcome letter in the last week of February from University of California, Santa Cruz, notifying them they will no longer have teaching appointments for the spring semester.  The grad assistants had started a strike, which spread to the U of C Davis and Santa Barbara campuses as well, over a cost of living adjustment.  The TAs are represented by the UAW.

Link & Comments Here

**********

Manufacturing + Logistics

Auto companies have shut down production for various lengths of time, including Ford, GM, FCA, Honda, Toyota, Nissan and Hyundai.  A couple of workers were sent home with the virus from an FCA plant in Sterling, Michigan sparking a set of wild cat strikes in protest, before the FCA announced the plant shutdown.

Amid speculation that auto workers could be called upon to return to work to produce much needed ventilators for the healthcare system, UAW leaders seem to believe that the employees would be willing to return to work in spite of the hazards due to contributing to a cause rather than simply returning to a job.  The idea is currently in the feasibility study phase and was instigated by the invocation of the Defense Production Act.

Amazon announced opening 100,000 new full- and part-time jobs in their distribution centers and delivery network, as Americans are shying away from brick and mortar retailers in favor of the perceived safety of online ordering.  Others retailers with online options are following suit.

Link & Comments Here

**********

Labor Around the World

France provided another blow to gig-economy companies by claiming Uber drivers were employees, not contractors.  Services like Uber, Lyft, Just Eat-Takeaway and Deliveroo are facing legal challenges from Brazil to Colombia, as they have been in the U.S.

Link & Comments Here

 

**********

Sticky Fingers

Current charges or sentences of embezzling union officials:

  • Rick Drain - LIUNA:  $50,281
  • Michael Johnson - IBEW:  $9,317
  • Janet Pilcher - NALC:  $65,033
  • John Sammons - AFGE:  $1,000
  • Moises Romero - IAM:  $100,000
  • Gary Jones - UAW:  $1,000,000
  • Shelby Hyman - AFSCME:  $176,000
  • Christian Leeds - AFSCME:  $13,444
  • Aphrodite Ueberroth - Iron Workers:  $750,000

http://nlpc.org/index.php?q=union-corruption-update

**********

Labor Relations INK is published semi-weekly and is edited by Labor Relations Institute, Inc. Feel free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you think might enjoy it.

New subscribers can sign up by visiting: http://lrionline.com/free-stuff/newsletter-signup/

If you use content from this newsletter please attribute it to Labor Relations Institute and include our website address: http://www.LRIonline.com

Contributing editors for this issue: Phillip Wilson, Greg Kittinger, and Meghan Jones

 

The post Labor Relations Ink March 2020 appeared first on Labor Relations Institute.

Labor Relations INK May 2020

$
0
0

In this issue:

  • Laboring Toward 2020
  • Tech/Media Unions
  • Alt-Labor
  • Insight, Sticky Fingers, Scoreboard and more…

The bottom of each story contains a link to the individual post on our site.

Labor Relations Insight by Phil Wilson

A few weeks ago I did a presentation (on Zoom, obviously) about virtual campaign communications during a world of social distancing. During that presentation I shared this chart, showing the topics I’ve been asked about most during the pandemic:

As you probably guessed, I live with a teenager.

The amount of time teens (and let’s face it, the rest of us humans) spend online is crazy. And the pandemic has dramatically increased this trend. While we take the first tentative steps back into meat-space there is no doubt that the vast majority of our interactions will continue to happen in cyber-space for the foreseeable future.

This raises an interesting question for unions. While most agree that unions today have the best organizing environment available to them in the last century, they too face the problem of access to potential members. And unions have had a pretty spotty record of leveraging technology to organize.

A fascinating, must-read article from In These Times explains the problem this way:

Reaching the next generation of union members means online organizing. It also means taking a much more flexible approach to organizing—one that does not restrict itself to only traditional union campaigns. The raw materials are millions of hard working, younger people who are at ease online, and who have the general political and moral tilt that would make them prime candidates for organized labor, but who don’t know much about unions, or how to connect their day-to-day work issues with what organized labor does. The attitude of traditional unions has often been that these working people should beat a path to their door. Instead, the labor movement needs to bring its tools to the people.

The article features a couple of online organizing platforms. The first, Coworker.org, has been around since 2013 and has hosted campaigns for millions of workers. These campaigns are not union organizing efforts. Instead, they are issue-driven campaigns. But they have proven the viability of online organizing around workplace complaints.

New entrants to the field include Unit.work and GetFrank.com. You should check out both of them.

Unit.work, unlike Coworker.org, is designed to start union organizing campaigns. Once a group of employees sign up they receive help with signing authorization cards and forming an independent union in a workplace. If employees choose to organize a “Unit Union” (this isn’t required) they agree to pay 0.8% of their monthly earnings as a subscription, beginning as soon as the election is won. In exchange employees get support from Unit during the organizing effort and subsequent collective bargaining negotiations.

Unit.work describes itself as a for-profit, labor-side consulting firm. This is a fascinating model that attempts to reach workplaces and potential bargaining units off the beaten path of traditional unions. It is not affiliated with any union. But independent unions organized in this way are no different than “official” unions. There are no examples of success stories on the website, but we’ll be on the lookout for examples of units organized this way.

GetFrank.com is also a for-profit company that works on a subscription basis. Instead of trying to organize a union with collective bargaining rights, GetFrank allows a group of workers to anonymously make demands of the employer.

One problem I see with GetFrank’s model is that an employer is under no obligation to deal with a representative like this (and commits an unfair labor practice if they negotiate with a non-majority representative). However, the app says they won’t make demands with less than 75% support from coworkers and it is easy to envision an employer who refuses to bargain with a GetFrank unit will quickly face an NLRB election. This is another fascinating model.

Will traditional unions take advantage of these innovations? Historically they’ve been slow to adopt, but I think anyone reading this would say their use of technology over the last two months has changed dramatically. It is hard to see the world going back to the way it was before the pandemic, and I am sure that will be true of union organizing as well. The first two months of 2020 saw union petition activity surge over the same period in 2019 (according to LRIRightnow data, January RC showed over a 30% increase year-over-year). As the economy re-opens so too has petition activity. It will be interesting to see if unions begin leveraging technology like this as part of their “new normal” toolkit.

Or maybe they’ll just spend more time on Tik-Tok.

Link & Comments

**********

Union Bailout Update

We have been tracking the NLRB responses to the pandemic, and maintaining a list of how each region has been handling elections and related issues, based on the experiences of the attorneys and our clients.  You can review that web page here.  Please email us any details from your own experience that would be helpful - we’ll keep the details confidential.

After its original postponement of elections, the board is working hard to maintain “business as usual.” Case in point, an acute care hospital that asked to stay the election due to “an extraordinary circumstance” and the expectation of a “huge influx of sick patients in the coming days and weeks,” was denied the appeal. It is possible that more definitive data would have persuaded the board, but the general argument of “current circumstances” wasn’t enough to trump the board’s obligation “to maintain operations to the extent that it is safe and feasible to do so.”

Although the regional directors have been opting to hold hearings via phone, the board ruled that in cases where witness testimony was involved, such hearings must be conducted by videoconference instead of phone.

Unfair labor practice hearings are set to resume on June 1.  The board has stated that both in-person and virtual options will be used, and the Division of Judges has acquired equipment and licenses to handle the virtual cases. Motions or objections with respect to holding an in-person or online hearing – or taking witness testimony by videoconference – will be decided by the designated ALJ.

The rules for conducting mail ballot elections - specifically the vote counting process - received clarification in Providence Health & Services – Oregon d/b/a Providence Portland Medical Center. Whereas prior to Providence, the agents counting votes were allowed to use discretion in attempting to interpret voter intent when there were marks in both the Yes and No box, the board provided a bright line rule that whenever a ballot “includes markings in more than one square or box, it is void.”

The notice posting requirements for employers who violate the NLRA have been modified during the pandemic, due to many companies either shutting down or working with reduced staff. The new guidelines state that the 14-day rule does not apply, and the 60 day time period for posting does not begin to run until a “substantial compliment” of workers has returned.

As employees are returning to work, the EEOC has provided guidance for handling high-risk employees, whether special accommodations are requested by the employees or not. Among the suggested strategies for mitigating risk to such individuals:

  • Providing additional or enhanced personal protective equipment, including gowns, masks, gloves or other protective equipment
  • Taking additional or enhanced protective measures, such as erecting physical barriers or increasing space between employees
  • Eliminating “marginal” job functions (i.e., less critical or incidental job duties as distinguished from the “essential” functions of a position)
  • Temporarily modifying work schedules to reduce contact with coworkers, or relocating the employee’s personal workspace to increase social distancing.
  • Identifying an effective accommodation depends on many factors, including the employee’s job duties and the design of the workspace. Consequently, the EEOC encourages employers to discuss with employees the listed examples as well as other possible accommodations.

In a case before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, an employer made a statement during collective bargaining that was perceived by the union as an “inability to pay” the wage increase demands proposed by the union. The union therefore requested financial documents from the employer to substantiate the claim, which it has the right to do, but when the employer clarified that it was “unwilling,” not “unable,” the NLRB held that there was no obligation to surrender the documents. The Court upheld the NLRB decision.

If you are in the retail or service industries and pay certain employees a significant amount of their income via commissions, a new rule that relaxes the “retail service exemption” will be of interest. The rule removed two provisions from the department’s Wage and Hour Division regulations, providing greater simplicity and flexibility in qualifying for the exemption. You can read the rule in the Federal Register here.

OSHA has returned to a normal policy of physical inspections in areas where covid cases are dropping. There are still some variable approaches to high-risk workplaces, but in general you should expect business-as-usual if you are in a state or area where covid risk is declining.

As was expected, Big Labor has been attempting to twist the covid crisis to promote its own agenda.  As both businesses and government agencies have grappled with proper and balanced responses to the pandemic, The AFL-CIO’s Richard Trumka railed at DOL Secretary Eugene Scalia for a perceived failure of OSHA to step up safety enforcement, especially in light of covid risks.

Trumka, along with support from Democratic lawmakers, sued OSHA to issue an emergency temporary standard to protect workers from coronavirus. The D.C. Court of Appeals required OSHA to reply to the Trumka’s motion by May 29. Scalia has defended OSHA’s handling of the issue by saying the agency can bring enforcement actions under the Occupational Safety and Health Act’s “general duty” clause.

As we reported in last month’s issue of INK, unions have successfully used the pandemic relief bills to advance their agenda. They are now pushing for the implementation of electronic NLRB elections to be added to further relief packages. In a letter to lawmakers, Big Labor demanded “The next COVID-19 response bill must include funding and direction to implement the changes needed for the NLRB to adopt an electronic representation election process.”

Link & Comments

**********

Laboring Toward 2020

Unionized staffers of Democratic presidential contender Joe Biden have reached a new milestone: the first time a major party’s apparent presidential nominee will employ unionized workers under a collective bargaining agreement. The agreement was announced in a joint statement between the Biden campaign and Teamsters Local 238. Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren paved the way when their primary campaign staffs organized.

Election season turns hosts of union organizers and volunteers into political canvassers, almost exclusively for Democratic contenders at local, state and national levels. A great deal of the energy has formerly been invested in face-to-face conversations, but in the age of social distancing, this should shift dramatically. Even phone bank operations may have to adapt. Digital media and paid advertising might see an uptick, with more reliance on texting and other social media campaigns.

The experiments carried out during the political season are likely to spill over into union organizing when the dust settles, if the unionistas can see through their biases to determine what worked and what didn’t.

Link & Comments

**********

Tech/Media Unions

NLRB officials are approving mail-in ballot elections as a way to keep organizing efforts alive during the pandemic. Examples of this include Instacart workers in Chicago voting to join UFCW, Johnson Control workers in San Antonio voting to join SMART, and Curaleaf Massachusetts (a medical marijuana dispensary) in Boston voting to join UFCW.

The Board also ruled this month that the election at Hearst Media will move forward, despite multiple objections by Hearst. A date for the election has not been set.

Link & Comments

**********

SCORE BOARD

Who are the winners (and losers) of the labor movement? Don’t guess, just check the LRI Scoreboard

View this month’s scoreboard (archives also located here).

Download a PDF of this month’s scoreboard

**********

Alt-Labor

The Service Employees International Union is still using its relationship with worker centers to instigate labor action––most recently, with Working Washington (WW) and its attempt to stage a strike against Chipotle utilizing Postmates workers.

Postmates is a gig-economy food delivery company. WW’s plan was to have Postmates workers ignore any and all Chipotle orders for a three day period. They even came up with a hashtag, #GuacOff. Funny thing though…we’re not seeing much report that anyone actually #GuacedOff.

Get ‘em next time, SEIU.

Link & Comments

**********

Union Corruption

Former USW President Gary Jones

Just a few months after the FCA-UAW scandal became public, rumors started to circulate about whether or not similar bribes and favors with the union were happening at GM and Ford as well. That was three years ago. GM is officially off the hook. Federal prosecutors informed the auto manufacturer in early May that it is not currently a target in the investigation of corruption within the Auto Workers union.

Former UAW President Gary Jones was arraigned this month on charges of embezzlement and racketeering. He pleaded not guilty.

Link & Comments

**********

California AG Xavier Becerra

Gig Economy

Early this month, the state of California filed a lawsuit against Uber and Lyft, claiming that both companies are misclassifying workers as independent contractors. The suit was filed by California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, along with city attorneys from San Francisco, Los Angeles, and San Diego.

The somewhat curious, slightly shady part of the whole deal is that each of the attorneys involved in the suit have significant labor connections. Namely, their campaigns have garnered hefty contributions from the state’s Big Labor community. Click here for details.

Link & Comments

**********

Healthcare

Illinois nursing homes avoided a major strike this month by about 10,000 members of SEIU Healthcare who work at more than 100 nursing homes in the state. The union and the Illinois Association of Healthcare Facilities reached a tentative agreement one day before the strike was set to take place.

Link & Comments

**********

Right-to-Work

The AFL-CIO and the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 150 are attempting to institute a law that would ban right-to-work legislation in the state of Illinois. Specifically, they are looking to bar any law from being passed that “restricts or interferes with the ability of workers to join together and collectively bargain over wages, hours, and terms and conditions of employment.”

The only problem is that Illinois law currently dictates that proposed constitutional amendments must be passed by state legislature at least six months before the next general election in order to make it on the ballot…and these unions are cutting it a little close. They blame COVID-19, of course; and are using the circumstance as the main argument in their petition to an Illinois federal court to lift the requirement.

In similar news, a West Virginia Supreme Court upheld the state’s right-to-work law in a 5-0 decision last month.

Link & Comments

**********

Labor Around the World

We’ve already seen how unions are taking advantage of the COVID-19 pandemic to organize workers here in the US, so it’s no surprise that the same is true in Canada. SEIU Local 2 launched a campaign to organize essential workers this month. The campaign is called, “Unions are Essential.” Meanwhile, the Canadian government has already budgeted an extra $3 billion to raise wages for the country’s essential workers, which begs the question – Are unions essential?

In Australia, unions are backing pay cuts for fast-food workers. Yes, you read that right.

Link & Comments

**********

Sticky Fingers

Current charges or sentences of embezzling union officials:

  • Tammy McBride – Roofers: $13,868
  • Unnamed Secretary – TWU: $350,000
  • Melvin Fisburn – IBEW: $82,213
  • Harold Schaitberger & Thomas Miller – IAFF: $6,000,000
  • Dayton Nakanelua & Jeanne Endo – UPW/AFSCME: $300,000
  • Anthony Dehl – NEA: $54,254
  • Judith Barker – IBT: $5,425
  • Joshua Greer – USW: $2,642
  • Rudy Zeigler – AFGE: $5,276

http://nlpc.org/index.php?q=union-corruption-update

**********

Labor Relations INK is published semi-weekly and is edited by Labor Relations Institute, Inc. Feel free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you think might enjoy it.

New subscribers can sign up by visiting: http://lrionline.com/free-stuff/newsletter-signup/

If you use content from this newsletter please attribute it to Labor Relations Institute and include our website address: http://www.LRIonline.com

Contributing editors for this issue: Phillip Wilson, Greg Kittinger, and Meghan Jones

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to receive our labor relations newsletters and updates. You can manage your email preferences by clicking the link at the bottom of any of our email communications.

NOTE: if you are using older versions of Internet Explorer, read the text version, as the html may not load properly. We recommend upgrading to the latest version.

 

The post Labor Relations INK May 2020 appeared first on Labor Relations Institute.

Labor Relations Ink June 2020

$
0
0

In this issue:

  • The end of Quickie Elections?
  • COVID-19, Labor Law and Unions
  • Tech/Media Unions
  • Sticky Fingers, Scoreboard and more…

The bottom of each story contains a link to the individual post on our site.

**********

Labor Relations Insight by Phil Wilson

The End of Quickie Elections? Sort of.

If there is one thing we’ve learned during this pandemic, it’s flexibility. One day you’re working in the office. The next day you’re “sheltering in place.” Later – especially out here in flyover country – you’re heading back to the office (what reopening phase are we in now?). Then… well, who the heck knows?

Plans change so fast right now it seems more efficient to not even have a plan. That works out pretty good for me, since I rarely have one. Our team recently did a hilarious presentation where I had to make a “love connection” with a new business strategy. The first two strategic options were my typical ones: “flying by the seat of my pants” and “shiny object.” Luckily, I chose option three.

If you happen to have an active NLRB campaign right now you might consider “seat of the pants” or “shiny object” as your strategy. That’s because the situation is changing almost every day.

On May 31 the NLRB’s proposed rule on election procedure was supposed to go into effect. This is the procedural rule that revised and fixed a lot of the problems with the Obama-era “quickie election” regulations. On Saturday May 30, a U.S. District Court Judge stopped parts of the rule from going into effect in AFL-CIO v. NLRB, No. 20-CV-0675 (Order issued May 30, 2020 and Memorandum Opinion issued on June 7, 2020). That is twist number one.

The judge’s opinion was quite interesting. The basic issue was whether the Board had acted improperly by not putting this rule through “notice and comment” rulemaking. Instead the Board argued these changes were merely procedural and did not require the full, formal rulemaking process. The judge agreed in part with this argument. Several aspects of the rule were fine. Only parts of the rule would not go into effect without additional consideration. That is twist number two.

The Board was now in the awkward position of having a rule that was partly OK and partly still being challenged. They had a choice to make: implement the parts of the rule that were OK, or wait until the litigation was finished. They chose – wisely in my opinion – to implement the parts of the rule the judge found were merely procedural. That is twist number three.

After all this twisting and turning, here is where we stand today (note: this may all change again as the litigation on the rule continues). First, the bad news. Below are the rules that were found unlawful and the parts of the quickie election rule that remain in effect:

New Rules Found Unlawful Old Rules Remaining in Effect
Section 102.64(a): Giving parties the right to litigate most voter eligibility and inclusion issues prior to the election. Section 102.64(a): Disputes concerning individuals’ eligibility to vote in an appropriate unit ordinarily need not be litigated or resolved before an election is conducted.
Section 102.67(b): Instructing that the Regional Director normally will not schedule an election before the 20th business day after the date of the direction of election. Section 102.67(b): The Regional Director shall schedule the election for the earliest date practicable.
Section 102.62(d) and 102.67(l): Mandating that employers furnish the required voter list to the Regional Director and other parties within five business days (rather than the two business days under the 2014 Rules) following the issuance of a direction of election. Section 102.62(d) and 102.67(l): Mandating that employers furnish the required voter list to the Regional Director and other parties within two business days following the issuance of a direction of election.
Section 102.69(a)(5): Limiting a party’s selection of election observers to individuals who are current members of the voting unit whenever possible. Section 102.69(a)(5): Any party may be represented by observers of its own selection subject to such limitations as the Regional Director may prescribe.
Section 102.69(b) and (c): Instructing that the Regional Director will no longer issue certifications following elections if a request for review is pending or before the time has passed during which a request for review could be filed. Section 102.69(b) and (c): Regional Directors retain the authority to issue certifications notwithstanding the pendency or possible filing of a request for review.

 

The good news is that significant parts of the new rule are now in effect. As far as election timing, the most significant changes that are currently in place include:

  • scheduling the initial hearing date at least 14 business days (rather than eight calendar days) from issuance of the Notice of Hearing;
  • filing the employer’s Statement of Position within eight business days (rather than seven calendar days) after service of the Notice of Hearing;
  • requiring a Statement of Position to be filed by the Petitioner in response to the issues raised in any Statement of Position (at least three business days before the hearing); and
  • allowing at least five business days for the parties to file post-hearing briefs.

These new rules are in place for any petition filed on or after May 31 and they add significantly more time for voters to consider their choice in an NLRB election. First, let’s look at a comparison between the Obama-era quickie election rule and the proposed rules that are in place today:

Around 12 more days were added to the election period under the current process. Compare this to the rules before the quickie election process went into effect in 2014. Before then the NLRB targeted most elections to occur no longer than 42 days from the date the petition was filed. The rule in place today gets the parties close to that 42-day target, and my guess is that in most cases where the parties go to hearing the actual election period will be longer than 42 days.

Another thing to remember is the new rules count everything by business days and not calendar days like under the old rule. This means that depending on when the petition is filed, the number of calendar days should be quite close to 42 days (there will be at least three weekends in there).

How does this compare to the full procedural rule if it had been allowed to proceed? Here is that comparison:

There is an eight-day difference between the current process and the proposed one (and the proposed rule is basically right on target with the pre-Obama era rules). The proposed change that accounts for this difference is the 20-day minimum between a Decision and Direction of Election (DDE) and the election date.

There is one other big difference if the proposed rule isn’t fully implemented. It impacts the number of cases that get to have a hearing in the first place. Under the ambush rule many unit determination issues are not litigated until after the election. That last statement deserves an eye roll emoji. It is criminal that this stupid “we’ll figure out who’s actually eligible to vote after the election” provision is still in place. Unfortunately, it still is.

The net of all this is that the quickie election rule is sort-of dead. The process changes that made it through are a substantial improvement over the ambush rule. Even if the Board is forced to go back to the drawing board on the other rules, these changes are important and welcome. They give voters significantly more time to consider both sides of the issue of unionization. And more time for me to go look for some shiny objects!

Link & Comments

**********

Union Bailout Update

The Senate has voted to advance the nominations of current NLRB members Marvin Kaplan and Lauren McFerran to additional terms. If confirmed, this still leaves one unfilled Democratic seat on the board.

One bright-line rule to come out of the pandemic crisis relates to stray marks on mail ballots used for union elections. The board, calling the history of past rulings inconsistent, established the simple rule that a ballot containing marks in more than one box is void, eliminating the need to interpret “voter intent.” The board also made the rule retroactive, and in an effort to make it clear to voters that more than one mark could invalidate their ballot, added the following language to the ballot: “If you submit a ballot with markings inside, or anywhere around, more than one square, your ballot will not be counted.”

Speaking of bright-line tests, the board realigned its jurisdiction determination for religious educational institutions to the D.C. Circuit standards. In the condensed version of the story, the board will now follow the University of Great Falls three-pronged test to determine whether or not such an institution falls under the jurisdiction of the NLRB. According to Great Falls, if the following three elements were satisfied, then the Board must decline to exercise jurisdiction: The institution:

  1. “holds itself out to students, faculty, and community as providing a religious educational environment”;
  2. is “organized as a nonprofit”; and
  3. is “affiliated with, or owned, operated, or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a recognized religious organization, or with an entity, membership of which is determined, at least in part, with reference to religion.”

The board broadened solicitation policies restrictions by removing the requirement that a union authorization card be present during a conversation. In Wynn Las Vegas, the board declared that an employee engages in solicitation “where an employee makes statements to a coworker during working time that are intended and understood as an effort to persuade the employee to vote a particular way in a union election.”

The NLRB upheld T-Mobile’s ban on the use of company email for union organizing.

NLRB General Counsel, Peter Robb, issued a guidance memo regarding the collection of evidence in unfair labor practice investigations. The memo addresses the handling of different types of witnesses (active witnesses vs. fact witnesses) as well as audio recordings.

Link & Comments

**********

COVID-19, Labor Law and Unions

Contributors Milam and Miller at Above the Law produced a meaty article on the impact of the pandemic on labor issues, and provide much food for thought on navigating the “new normal.” In addressing concerted activity for example, the authors pose the following questions about what may now qualify:

Can workers refuse to work without personal protective equipment? Can they stage a walkout if their worksites are not routinely sanitized? Can they refuse to work with a coworker who violates social distancing protocol? For unionized employees, who often work under collective bargaining agreements containing “no strike” clauses, the answer becomes thornier; for unionized hospital workers, even more so.

Can employees gang up on non-mask-wearing coworkers on an unofficial employee Facebook page? Can an employee email the entire distribution list to invite them to a webinar on “Your COVID safety rights” by a union seeking a foothold at the company?

The authors also parse the nuances of the changing dynamics of some of the following collective bargaining topics: health and safety, wage and hour, return to work, and benefits. Additionally, new potential union organizing strategies are addressed, including the co-opting of the “sick-out” event, the redefinition of “essential workers,” and the spotlight on economic insecurity that the pandemic created. The article is worth a read.

Big Labor may be scrambling to catch up with non-union-organized employee actions, trying to find a way to pull such activists into the union tent. At a Michigan Taco Bell for example, employees organized a petition and called a press conference to push for hazard pay, paid sick leave for Covid symptoms, and thermometers. They won their demands for all 250 employees of the seven-store franchise. Even though the Emergency Workplace Organizing Committee - a joint effort of the Democratic Socialists of America and the United Electrical Workers - helped steer the employees to a winning strategy, the employees did not end up unionized.

There are myriad issues, or “covid” twists on perennial issues, that employers will face as they try to return to some form of business-as-usual. Among them are:

  • Work schedule accommodations
  • Suspended or relaxed attendance (and associated discipline) policies
  • PPE and work safety considerations
  • Right to refuse work
  • Right to notification of positive covid tests among employees
  • Health insurance guarantees during covid related absences
  • Financial assistance for covid related medical expenses
  • Extra breaks for cleaning of hands and workspaces

Unions will magnify these issues as both organizing and collective bargaining strategy.

Link & Comments

**********

Tech/Media Unions

Facebook has deployed a new tool called Facebook Workplace. It essentially serves as a way for companies to share content with their employees through a medium similar to the newsfeed feature on the original Facebook site.

There has been some controversy though around the “content control” feature that allows organizations to essentially keep certain phrases from being posted. And in Facebook’s in-house demonstration of the new feature, they poorly chose the word “unionize” as its example. Cut to, a lot of employees upset about their labor rights.

Ironically, this came shortly after some Facebook workers held a “virtual walkout” earlier this month.

Link & Comments

**********

SCORE BOARD 

Who are the winners (and losers) of the labor movement? Don’t guess, just check the LRI Scoreboard.

View this month’s scoreboard (archives also located here).

Download a PDF of this month’s scoreboard

**********

Union Corruption

Former USW President Gary Jones

The NLRB ruled this month, after an unfair labor practice charge was filed against the union, that Teamster bosses illegally cut a deal giving pay raises to only the union stewards at a healthcare facility in Fairfield, West Virginia. This is another case of unions saying that they fight for equal treatment of all workers, but not necessarily following through when the foot hits the floor. More details here.

In addition, U.S. prosecutors say that a takeover of the Auto Workers union is still very much on the table after ex-president Gary Jones pleaded guilty to embezzlement last month.

Link & Comments

**********

It’s All Academic

Graduate student unions at both Harvard and Brown reached tentative contract agreements this month. This comes after more than a year of bargaining, in both cases. It also further codifies the role of graduate student worker as employee under the National Labor Relations Act.

Link & Comments

**********

Gig Economy

COVID-19 is moving gig economy companies to extend benefits to contract workers. In some cases, this is a forced move by city ordinances – as in Seattle, where the City Council is now requiring app-based companies like Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, and Instacart to pay their workers a form of sick pay.

In a few other cases, gig employers are choosing to grant this benefit on their own. Instacart is the primary example of this. In addition to granting sick pay to those who contract the virus themselves, the company has approved sick pay for those who have had a family member contract the virus as well. They are also offering free telehealth services, and they are applying this policy nationwide.

A global pandemic gives cause to make some exceptions in regards to policy and procedure. However, it will be interesting to see how these decisions today may come back to affect the gig economy and the independence of the contract worker in the future.

Link & Comments

**********

Labor Around the World

U.S. labor unions are speaking up against the arrest of one of Mexico’s top labor activists. Labor attorney, Susana Prieto, was arrested during a protest early this month. AFL-CIO President, Richard Trumpka, among other U.S. labor leaders, say that Prieto’s arrest undermines Mexico’s promise to protect workers’ rights – agreed upon as a part of the USMCA. The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement is set to go into effect on July 1.

In Korea, one gig economy worker was ruled to be an employee under the country’s Labor Standards Action. The individual worked as a driver for one of Korea’s ride-hailing services (like Uber and Lyft). In finding that the driver was an employee, the National Labor Relations Commission of Korea cited “the degree of control and direction imposed on the driver.”

Link & Comments

**********

Sticky Fingers

Current charges or sentences of embezzling union officials:

William Drath - IAFF:  $18,000

http://nlpc.org/index.php?q=union-corruption-update

**********

Labor Relations INK is published semi-weekly and is edited by Labor Relations Institute, Inc. Feel free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you think might enjoy it.

New subscribers can sign up by visiting: http://lrionline.com/free-stuff/newsletter-signup/

If you use content from this newsletter please attribute it to Labor Relations Institute and include our website address: http://www.LRIonline.com.

Contributing editors for this issue: Phillip Wilson, Greg Kittinger, and Meghan Jones

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to receive our labor relations newsletters and updates. You can manage your email preferences by clicking the link at the bottom of any of our email communications.

NOTE: if you are using older versions of Internet Explorer, read the text version, as the html may not load properly. We recommend upgrading to the latest version.

 

The post Labor Relations Ink June 2020 appeared first on Labor Relations Institute.

Labor Relations INK July 2020

$
0
0

In this issue:

  • The Return of Workplace Civility?
  • Union Organizing
  • Union Corruption
  • Scoreboard, Sticky Fingers and more…

**********

Labor Relations Insight by Phil Wilson

The Return of Workplace Civility?

Do you get the feeling that in 2020 everything is dialed up to 11? I sure do. Our country (and the world) face high-stakes issues. Things are emotional. And every conversation seems to have more at stake.

There has never been a bigger need for companies (at least the ones fortunate enough to continue to operate) to foster an environment where teammates can have a civil conversation at work. The NLRB took a big step forward by rationalizing its approach to workplace civility cases this week in its General Motors decision.

The key issue at stake in General Motors is when (if ever) an employer can lawfully enforce its workplace civility rules. In this particular case a union official repeatedly verbally abused, including threats, members of management. These tirades occurred at work in front of others.

The Board also looked at other situations that have come up over the last several years: racial slurs shouted on a picket line, swearing out a company owner during a meeting, or vulgar social media posts about a manager. Over the last decade the decisions in this area became harder and harder to understand. If there was any concerted activity around the time of the abusive comments the Board would find the abuse lawful. At the same time, almost any complaint was found to be concerted activity. All three of the fact scenarios listed above (yes, including racist slurs) got protection.

These cases rest on the idea that there is no way to analytically separate the abusive language from the concerted activity, and that the protections of the Act trump any attempt by the employer to enforce civility rules. The Board in General Motors took down both pillars of this argument.

First, they explain that it’s absurd to say that you can’t separate verbal abuse from concerted activity. It is entirely possible that an employee could be engaged in protected activity and lose that protection by violating a neutrally enforced civility rule. Even the cases overturned by General Motors do this.

The main difference between General Motors and the confusing batch of cases it overturns is the way they focused on the context of each event. These results-oriented decisions gave each situation its own test focused only on whether the employee’s actions were egregious enough to lose protection of the Act. Predictably, this led to a slippery slope of more and more outrageous conduct being protected.

The situation got so bad that it put employers in the awkward position of choosing to violate Equal Employment Opportunity statutes in order to avoid liability under the National Labor Relations Act. The idea that you can’t discipline an employee for making racist comments just because they happened to make them on a picket line is disastrously bad policy. General Motors fixes that.

The General Motors decision returns these cases to the long-established and easily understandable Wright Line test. Instead of focusing on when an action becomes so abusive that it loses protection of the Act, it instead focuses on whether the employer’s action was motivated by union animus. These cases use a burden-shifting model that is common in EEO cases. First the General Counsel must establish that (1) the employee engaged in Section 7 activity, (2) the employer knew of that activity, and (3) the employer had animus against the Section 7 activity, proven with evidence that establishes a causal relationship between the discipline and the Section 7 activity. If the General Counsel has made his initial case, the burden of persuasion shifts to the employer to prove it would have taken the same action even in the absence of the Section 7 activity.

The Wright Line framework achieves the clear purposes of protecting concerted activity while at the same time preserving the right of an employer to provide a civil and inclusive place to work. In 2020 this balance has never been more important. As former Member Johnson stated in his Pier Sixty dissent:

The challenge in the modern workplace is to bring people of diverse beliefs, backgrounds, and cultures together to work alongside each other to accomplish shared, productive goals. Civility becomes the one common bond that can hold us together in these circumstances. Reflecting this underlying truth, moreover, legal and ethical obligations make employers responsible for maintaining safe work environments that are free of unlawful harassment. Given all this, employers are entitled to expect that employees will coexist, treating each other with some minimum level of common decency.

“Treating each other with some minimum level of common decency,” is not a very high bar. It shouldn’t be a legal minefield for employers to provide a workplace like that. That is more true today than it’s ever been. The General Motors decision finally gives clarity to employers and encourages them to do just that.

**********

Union Bailout Update

The NLRB General Counsel has provided guidelines for the handling of in-person elections. The protocols were developed collaboratively with Regional Directors, the NLRB Division of Operations-Management, the NLRB COVID-19 Task Force, and the internal union representing NLRB employees. Although the memo promotes the guidelines as “suggestions,” expect Regional Directors to hold manual elections based on these health and safety protocols.

As was expected, unions, along with several Democrat allies, are using the pandemic to renew their push for electronic elections. A House bill that mirrors the electronic system used by the National Mediation Board currently has 45 sponsors.

OSHA has published guidance on maintaining safe workplaces relative to Covid-19, recommending face masks but not mandating them, and distinguishing PPE that meet OSHA workplace requirements from pandemic facemasks.

In the recent Care One decision, the NLRB reversed a 2016 decision that required employers to bargain with a newly-certified union prior to imposing “serious discipline” before the employer and union reached an initial collective-bargaining agreement. The decision returns to employers the ability to impose discipline on newly unionized employees not yet subject to a CBA without first notifying and bargaining with the union, including discipline that may involve managerial discretion.

The NLRB General Counsel has taken another step to make unions accountable for violating their duty of fair representation of members. In prior memos (2018 and 2019) GC Peter Robb made clear that unions should have in place a grievance tracking mechanism to protect against meritorious fair representation claims. This latest memo announces that he intends to ask the NLRB to overrule its current standard for proving an individual’s entitlement to make whole relief against a union, creating a more lenient make-whole damages standard.

The NLRB recently cited workplace safety and proper use issues in upholding work rules reinforcing an employer’s right to monitor and/or search personal vehicles or property on company premises, including company-provided electronic devices.

It may seem like semantics, but the D.C. Circuit Court reminded the NLRB that a proper Weingarten request must contain an actual “request.” In Circus Circus Casinos, Inc., the NLRB charged the employer of violating the NLRA upon an alleged statement from an employee that he “called the Union three times [and] nobody showed up, I’m here without representation.” Although the NLRB found that the employer violated the Act by denying Weingarten representation, the court said this would not be considered a request for such representation.

**********

Laboring Toward 2020

The Biden campaign has released a 110-page document ahead of the Democratic National Convention with policy recommendations, including calls for the passage of the PRO Act, card-check elections, a ban on right-to-work laws and forced arbitration agreements, and a host of other labor and employment reforms proposed by the Clean Slate Project to expand the power of labor unions.

The SEIU has announced that it will launch a $150 million effort in 40 states in support of the Biden campaign. The “Essential for Joe” campaign will center on text messaging and social media, with the objective to reach 6 million voters.

**********

Healthcare

The New York State Nurses Association is pushing local hospitals to turn over statistics on Covid-19 in nurses. The union, which represents 42,000 workers statewide, has also been busy filing unfair labor practice charges against many of the local hospitals for allegedly not providing proper PPE.

Speaking of which, FEMA Administrator, Pete Gaynor, told lawmakers this week that the U.S. could face shortages of PPE in areas where the number of Covid-19 cases are rising. While we are in better shape than we were at the end of March and April, a surge in demand in states with growing hospitalizations could cause ‘micro-shortages,’ he said.

Another former member of the Service Employees has filed federal charges against the union for continuing to deduct dues from his paycheck after he tried twice to end his membership with the union.

**********

SCORE BOARD

Who are the winners (and losers) of the labor movement? Don’t guess, just check the LRI Scoreboard

View this month’s scoreboard (archives also located here).

Download a PDF of this month’s scoreboard

**********

Union Organizing

Zoom and other virtual platforms have become a lifesaver to industries across the globe as we continue to navigate the Covid-19 pandemic. Unions are no different. From regular membership meetings to annual conventions, organizing attempts, and sessions discussing contract language, the union hall has gone virtual.

**********

Union Corruption

Schaitberger

Harold Schaitberger, the longtime president of the country’s largest firefighter union (IAFF), has been accused by the union’s treasurer of embezzling more $1 million from the union pension fund. Schaitberger is also known for being a spokesperson and advisor to Joe Biden’s campaign.

Early this month, the former president of United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1208, was sentenced to 14 months in prison, and ordered to pay full restitution for conspiracy, for embezzling around $213,000 from the union, which represents about 3,600 Smithfield employees in the Carolinas.

In New York, the president of the Law Enforcement Employees Benevolent Association (LEEBA), was charged with defrauding the LEEBA annuity fund of more than $500,000 following his arrest. Separately, the union’s treasurer was charged with obstruction and making false statements in the case. Both of these charges come as a result of a joint probe into the union by the FBI, the IRS, the U.S. Labor Department and the City Comptroller’s Office.

Lastly, federal prosecutors met with UAW leaders to negotiate a deal that might help the union avoid government oversight after years of corruption.

**********

It’s All Academic

Teachers unions across the country are pushing back against the decision to reopen schools in the fall. We will no doubt continue to see negotiations with teacher unions as a key challenge to navigating this critical issue.

The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE) announced on July 6 that college students on visas would not be allowed to stay in the U.S. for the fall semester if their institution is only going to offer online classes. Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology filed a lawsuit a few days later to block the directive. Graduate student unions representing 600,000 student workers filed a brief in support of the suit.

The City University of New York laid off 2,600 adjunct professors and part-time staff due to the economic downturn. In response, the union representing the employees sued the university this month.

**********

Minimum Rising

A number of state and local minimum wages were set to increase on July 1, 2020. While most moved forward with the minimum wage increase, a few small jurisdictions considered postponing the increase due to Covid-19. Some of the increases include:

  • Illinois: $10/hour
  • District of Columbia: $15/hour
  • Nevada: $9/hour
  • Chicago: $13.50/hour or $14/hour depending on employer size
  • San Francisco: $16.07/hour

Click here for a more detailed list.

**********

Right-to-Work

Two years after the Janus decision went into effect, which gave workers the right to choose whether or not they want to be a member of their workplace union, the four largest public sector unions have seen a decrease in membership numbers for a combined loss of 340,000 workers. These unions include the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), and the National Education Association.

**********

Sticky Fingers

Current charges or sentences of embezzling union officials:

  • Amber Blake – IAM:  $39,159
  • Kenneth Wynder Jr. – LEEBA:  $500,000
  • Scott A. Wilson – IUOE:  $4,500,000
  • Angel Garcia – ATU:  $117,000
  • Cathy Byers – AFT:  $23,000

http://nlpc.org/index.php?q=union-corruption-update

**********

Labor Relations INK is published semi-weekly and is edited by Labor Relations Institute, Inc. Feel free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you think might enjoy it.

New subscribers can sign up by visiting: http://lrionline.com/free-stuff/newsletter-signup/

If you use content from this newsletter please attribute it to Labor Relations Institute and include our website address: http://www.LRIonline.com

Contributing editors for this issue: Phillip Wilson, Greg Kittinger, and Meghan Jones

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to receive our labor relations newsletters and updates. You can manage your email preferences by clicking the link at the bottom of any of our email communications.

The post Labor Relations INK July 2020 appeared first on Labor Relations Institute.

Labor Relations INK August 2020

$
0
0

Labor Relations Insight by Phil Wilson

On August 13, the NLRB General Counsel’s office issued a number of new and interesting advice memoranda. An advice memorandum issues when a region asks the General Counsel’s office for advice about how to resolve an unfair labor practice charge. The General Counsel’s office writes a memo explaining how they evaluate the case and their advice on how the charge should be resolved (either dismissed or proceed with a formal complaint).

There are two types of advice memoranda released to the public. The first is a memorandum where the General Counsel directs a region to dismiss a pending unfair labor practice charge. Those are required to be released under NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132 (1975). The General Counsel also has discretion to issue memoranda on closed cases, but those aren’t required to be released.

The advice memoranda issued earlier this month cover a number of pressing issues around what types of employee protest activities qualify for protection under the Act. They also cover several issues unionized companies face during the Covid pandemic. These are very practical questions, and it is very helpful to see how the regions are being directed to respond to these cases.

In Cudd Energy (28-CA-240949) the General Counsel was asked to weigh in on a case where an employee at an energy company went off on the company’s decision to use a new type of fracking equipment. In an f-bomb laden Facebook post the employee railed against the change and threatened to not help or assist anyone with the equipment unless he got a raise. The charge went further to allege that the employer’s social media policy was overbroad.

In this case the General Counsel found that the Facebook post was unprotected. To get protection under the act the employee’s activity must be concerted. In this case the employee’s complaints were individual grievances – he did not want to work on the new equipment and disagreed with the decision. Furthermore, there was no attempt to engage in concerted activity – he said he would not help others unless he got a raise.

Even though the outburst was on Facebook where coworkers could have seen or liked the post (there was no evidence on either of these points) the General Counsel found these would not have changed the nature of the conduct. It remained an individual railing against his employer on social media. Since the activity did not give rise to protection under the Act, the appropriateness of the social media policy was no longer an issue.

Hornell Gardens (3-CA-258740) dealt with a similar issue – whether an individual grievance converts to concerted activity gaining protection under the Act. In this case a nurse protested against being required to share isolation gowns. After complaining to the employer in an employee meeting, she ultimately threatened to walk off the job in protest, which she eventually did. The employer terminated the nurse for abandoning her patients. Later, when interviewed over the incident, the employer was quoted saying they would notify the state licensing agency of the action.

The nurse filed an unfair labor practice arguing that her termination was unlawful and that the interview was a threat in retaliation for her protected activity. The General Counsel found, like in Cudd, that the complaints here were individual grievances. While she did raise concerns during a meeting in front of others, her complaint was that she did not want to share gowns. Her walkout was also personal – while she mentioned it to others, she did not try to get others to join and she was the only nurse to leave.

The General Counsel also found that the reporting to the licensing agency did not give rise to a claim for retaliation. First, because the initial activity was not protected or concerted. Second, because the walkout was a violation of her licensing requirements and reporting this was routine.

One other protest case also did not qualify for protection under the Act. In Starbucks Coffee Co. (4-CA-252338) a protest was held inside a Starbucks store. In addition to the non-employees involved in the protest a number of off-duty employees also participated. The company terminated the off-duty employee participants for participating in the protest which had the purpose and effect of disrupting company operations. The off-duty employees claimed their actions should be protected by the Act.

The General Counsel found that the protest and disruption by off-duty employees lost protection of the Act. Unlike actions for on-duty employees (pointing to the decision in Wal-Mart) the actions of off-duty employees who caused a disruption inside the store was not protected activity. The General Counsel declined the opportunity to ask the NLRB to reconsider the Wal-Mart case regarding disruptive protests inside a store.

In another case the General Counsel found that complaints about employer safety issues during Covid did qualify for protection under the Act. In Marek Brothers Drywall (16-CA-258507) an employee complained about lack of handwashing or sanitizing stations during a safety meeting. These complaints were not personal to him – during the safety meeting he referred to his coworkers and asked them to join with him in his complaints. The General Counsel found that this activity did qualify for protection under the Act, and therefore found that the employer engaged in an unfair labor practice by discriminatorily laying him off.

The other notable case dealt with unionized companies. In a situation that is coming up time and again with unionized companies, the General Counsel found that companies are not required to re-open labor agreements mid-term to negotiate over terms and conditions related to the Covid pandemic. In Memphis Ready Mix (15-CA-259794) the union asked the employer to re-open their contract to bargain over paid sick leave and hazard pay for employees covered by the agreement. The General Counsel determined that employers are not required to open a contract for mid-term bargaining over issues related to the pandemic.

These advice memorandums are helpful guides to answer many of the thorny questions raised during the pandemic. I hope these summaries are helpful and we’ll keep an eye out for new ones.

**********

Union Bailout Update

Kaplan

The NLRB retains the current GOP majority as Marvin Kaplan and Lauren McFerran are confirmed to the board. Kaplan’s new term will expire in August 2025 and McFerran’s in December 2024.

The DOL and the NLRB have both issued separate rules defining joint employer status. Both make it harder to find a business to be the joint employer of another business’s employee. It is expected that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) will issue its own rule soon defining joint employment under federal anti-discrimination statutes like Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

In Nicholson Terminal, the NLRB found that an employer policy against “calling, participating in or encouraging others to call or participate in an illegal slowdown, strike (including a sympathy strike) or walkout,” was lawful. The decision reversed an Administrative Law Judge, citing The Boeing Company “reasonable employee” standard.

McFerran

In another possible “new normal” ruling, the NLRB upheld an administrative law judge’s ruling directing that an unfair labor practice trial be conducted by videoconference because of the pandemic. The William Beaumont decision will mean that more ULP trials will likely be held via video until the pandemic subsides, but it may also mean videoconferencing could become an accepted method post-pandemic.

The NLRB provided additional clarification of a successor employer’s duty to bargain in a supplemental decision issued in late July. The question presented was whether and to what extent the successor could take further unilateral action, free of the duty to bargain with the union. The board clarified that, in the context of unilaterally imposed terms and conditions of employment, a successor employer is free to take actions that are reasonably encompassed by the unilaterally implemented terms and conditions without first bargaining with the union. To follow the board’s logic, read the details here.

The NLRB also announced a proposed rule to return to the Excelsior requirement of pre-Ambush Election Rule standards, eliminating the need to provide personal and cell phone numbers and email addresses. A second proposed rule allows for absentee ballots for those employees on military leave.

In the Covid response arena, the NLRB released five advice memoranda on August 13th providing guidance to Regional offices (see Insight article above). The instructions included:

  • An employer is not obligated to engage in midterm bargaining regarding Union proposals for paid sick leave and hazard pay because of the ongoing pandemic.
  • Without independent evidence of retaliatory animus, an employee cannot link an adverse employment action to complaints over COVID-19-related safety measures (or lack thereof) in a safety meeting on behalf of others, despite the fact that they could otherwise be considered protected concerted activity.
  • Expression of individualized concerns over COVID-19 safety measures do not rise to the level of protected concerted activity.
  • In the absence of an explanation as to relevance, an employer may refuse to furnish the union with information requested in connection with a pending grievance over COVID-related lay-offs without violating its obligation to bargain in good faith.
  • An employer need not turn its financial records over to the union in the context of a temporary closure unless it asserts that the move was driven by a lack of assets.
  • An employer is not operating under a mandatory duty to bargain over a decision (as opposed to the effects of that decision) to close temporarily due to significant business downturn caused by the pandemic.
  • To the extent that they are an “inevitable consequence” of the decision to temporarily close because of the pandemic as set forth above, an employer is not obligated to bargain over the effects of that decision either.

**********

The Covid-19 Minefield

The Covid-driven legislation has created another layer of regulation of the labor management process, especially the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA). A federal court recently struck down portions of the FFCRA regulations related to the two types of leave allowed for in the act.  Now that schools are “resuming” across the country, school and childcare issues are further complicating an employees eligibility for leave under the FFCRA.

Lawsuits aimed at employers are arising from pandemic-related issues. Among the key areas for exposure are:

  • Failure to safeguard the workplace
  • Failure to properly pay employees
  • Failure to accommodate high-risk workers
  • Failure to comply with the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA)
  • Failure to properly conduct layoffs/reinstatements

Another looming issue is whether or not asking employees to sign waivers against suing the companies for Covid-19 related illnesses is legitimate. Many lawyers claim such waivers will be unenforceable, and California last year passed a law prohibiting employers from requiring employees or job applicants to sign away their right to pursue legal claims or benefits under state law. Several employees have been fired for refusing to sign “Covid” waivers.

**********

Laboring Toward 2020

Unions may develop heartburn this election season. Typically backing the Democrat party as the “friend of labor,” ten times more manufacturing jobs were added during the first 21 months of the Trump administration compared to the last 21 months of the Obama/Biden administration, leaving labor realists in a predicament. Biden’s commitment to the Green New Deal would strip another 200,000 jobs from the energy sector.

Although Trump did secure the backing of the National Association of Police Organizations, the Teamsters and the Pipefitters became the latest of the larger unions to endorse Biden, seemingly willing to cut off their noses to spite their faces.

**********

Tech/Media Unions

Staffers at Hearst magazine have officially voted to secure union representation from the Writers Guild of America East. The WGAE bargaining unit will be composed of 500 employees from across Hearst Magazine’s 25 digital and print brands.

**********

Union Corruption

UAW Regional Director Richard Rankin resigned this month after allegations of “sexual and sex-based harassment and retaliation.”

At SEIU, the degree to which sexual misconduct allegations have been swept under the rug continues to surface. In addition, sexual misconduct ‘whistle blowers’ can expect to be retaliated against.

The NLRB has filed a complaint against Teamsters Local 175 for imposing a discriminatory pay scheme at a rehab and care facility in West Virginia. In Long Island, NY, an ex-Teamster official has pleaded guilty to soliciting and receiving bribes from the union’s health plan administrator.

And lastly, despite clear evidence that AFSCME forged a worker’s signature, the court continues to dismiss her case and deny her restitution, according to the National Legal and Policy Center.

**********

SCORE BOARD 

Who are the winners (and losers) of the labor movement? Don’t guess, just check the LRI Scoreboard

View this month’s scoreboard (archives also located here).

Download a PDF of this month’s scoreboard

**********

Gig Economy

Early this month, a California judge gave Uber and Lyft a ten day window to reclassify their gig economy drivers as employees. In response, both companies threatened to suspend operations in California if forced to transition to full-time employment of drivers in such a short time frame.

After filing an appeal, a California appeals court extended the length of time that both companies have to make the changes. Currently, the time frame is indefinite.

DoorDash is also on the hook in California as District Attorney Chesa Boudin pushes the company to reclassify its drivers as employees. Boudin has already filed a lawsuit and now asks for an injunction from the court.

A similar fight may be brewing in Pennsylvania after a Supreme Court judge ruled that an Uber driver there was not self-employed and thus, qualified for unemployment benefits. This ruling is a reversal of a suit originally filed five years ago.

**********

Healthcare

After striking last month, nurses at HCA Healthcare have now received the go-ahead for a union election. Ballots were mailed out to HCA Healthcare Mission Health system in Asheville, NC on August 18th. The NLRB will determine the results of the secret ballot election on September 16. Mission Health is a seven-hospital health system with more than 12,000 employees.

Unionization efforts among healthcare workers found success elsewhere this month as well, as 700 nurses at West Penn Hospital in Bloomfield, IL voted to unionize.

**********

Logistics/Manufacturing

After being on strike for over 9 months, Asarco employees in Arizona are heading back to work. This comes after a June NLRB decision in favor of the unions, who argued that Asarco was not bargaining in good faith.

The biggest takeaway from this strike is the reminder that there is a difference in responsibility, on the employer’s end, based on whether or not the strike is determined to be economically based or unfair labor practice based. When striking workers are considered “unfair labor practice strikers,” they are protected from permanent replacement. The company has a duty to reinstate the striking workers.

More details on the NLRB’s “Right to Strike” and employer responsibility here.

**********

Retail

As of last week, more than 13,802 U.S. brick and mortar stores have closed in 2020. This number is already significantly higher than the 9,879 stores that closed in 2019 and the 5,700 stores that closed in 2018.

While the shift from brick and mortar to online stores has been in transition for years, the coronavirus pandemic has indeed played its part this year. The common denominator amongst all the store closures is high debt and low cash flow.

Click here for a comprehensive list of store closures, from Bath & Body Works to GNC.

**********

Sticky Fingers

Current charges or sentences of embezzling union officials:

  • Sean Clark - SPEA:  $83,000
  • Linda & Jennifer Rogers - AFSCME:  $40,000
  • Misty Fain - LIUNA:  $50,000
  • Tony Westly - OPCMIA:  $100,000
  • Matthew Cuomo - AFGE:  $500
  • Karen Pierce - UA:  undisclosed
  • John Ulrich - IBT:  $55,000
  • Sandra King - FPS:  $57,000

http://nlpc.org/index.php?q=union-corruption-update

**********

Labor Relations INK is published semi-weekly and is edited by Labor Relations Institute, Inc. Feel free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you think might enjoy it.

New subscribers can sign up by visiting: http://lrionline.com/free-stuff/newsletter-signup/

If you use content from this newsletter please attribute it to Labor Relations Institute and include our website address: http://www.LRIonline.com

Contributing editors for this issue: Phillip Wilson, Greg Kittinger, and Meghan Jones

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to receive our labor relations newsletters and updates. You can manage your email preferences by clicking the link at the bottom of any of our email communications.

NOTE: if you are using older versions of Internet Explorer, read the text version, as the html may not load properly. We recommend upgrading to the latest version.

The post Labor Relations INK August 2020 appeared first on Labor Relations Institute.

Labor Relations INK October 2020

$
0
0

In this issue:

  • Laboring Towards 2020
  • CoVid-19
  • Union Organizing
  • Healthcare
  • Insight, Sticky Fingers and more…

**********

Labor Relations Insight by Phil Wilson

What’s happening with voter turnout in NLRB elections?

This week Bloomberg News reported that union win rates in NLRB elections have remained steady over the course of this year (pre- and post-Covid), meaning that mail-ballot elections haven’t helped unions as much as employers may have first feared. Our data from LRI RightNow agrees – unions won 67.7% of elections certified after the NLRB re-opened elections on April 4. Unions won 68.5% of elections certified this year prior to the shutdown.[1]

That wasn’t what popped out to me in the story, however. What caught my attention was the voter turnout numbers. The article stated that voter turnout in mail ballot elections this year was just over 42%. That’s shockingly low. The article also noted that average turnout over the prior five years was 47%. The article stated:

Voter turnout was 42.1% for both mail-ballot and in-person elections, the analysis of 2020 election results showed. That represents a dip from the 47% turnout for union elections from 2015 to 2019.

 

“Voter turnout has been unusually low so far this year, but that’s understandable, given the logistical challenges brought on by the pandemic,” Bloomberg Law labor and employment analyst Robert Combs said. “What’s surprising is that these challenges haven’t affected one method of voting more than another, in terms of either participation by voters or the outcome of the elections.”

I scratched my head for a while on this one. After all, we handle nearly 100 elections each year and I’ve been doing this work for longer than I want to admit. I can’t remember an election where turnout was anywhere near as low as 40%. I know low turnout does occasionally happen. But the political science major in me has always loved how NLRB elections represent what elections in the US should be like. Every vote matters, and the turnout is usually quite high especially when voters fully understand how the election works.

Even with the mail ballot elections we’ve worked I’ve been surprised at voter turnout. I finally concluded something must be wrong with the data.

In our database we show voter turnout numbers significantly higher than 42% and 47% mentioned in the article. We show a total of 254 elections certified prior to the re-opening on April 6. In those elections there were 12,085 eligible voters and a total of 9,470 votes cast, which is turnout of 78.3%.

After elections re-opened (and virtually all of these were mail ballot elections) there’ve been 475 elections certified, with 31,368 voters eligible and 21,159 votes cast, which is turnout of 67.4%.

Finally, from 2015-2019 we show 7,509 elections with 465,529 eligible voters, with 361,139 total votes cast, or a turnout of 77.6%. That’s basically the same as the pre-Covid elections certified this year.

Which numbers are right? I’m still investigating, but I’m pretty sure there was a mistake in the Bloomberg article. It looks like they are relying on reports from the NLRB, so it could be a mistake made in those reports. Or I also considered if they only counted union votes instead of all votes cast. I’ll let you know what I find out.

There is a bigger lesson here. The political science major in me also knows better than to make any political predictions for the upcoming elections. However, I think it is safe to say that there will be a LOT of statistics thrown around about union elections over the next few years. These will be used to justify or dispute the need for major labor law reform.

Just like in the world at large, there will be a fair amount of “fake news” about what happens in NLRB elections. That’s why it is more important than ever for practitioners to be careful about taking what they read or hear at face value. And that includes this article – maybe I’ve made a mistake. And rest assured that if I have, I’ll let you know.

_______________________

[1] Our numbers differ slightly from the election win percentages in the Bloomberg article. This could be for any number of reasons. We look at the date an election is certified, but they may be looking at the date the election is held. We included all elections, but they may only be looking at RC elections. And with so many elections in the database there could be a mistake in the records. But our numbers are usually very close.

**********

Union Bailout Update

Social media policy received additional clarification when the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) overruled an administrative law judge (ALJ) in Bemis Co., Inc. In the decision, the board indicated its willingness to look at a social media policy as a whole, rather than nitpicking individual sections, to decide if the rule could be construed by a reasonable employee to repress Section 7 activities.

In General Motors LLC and Charles Robinson, the board separate egregious behavior from protected concerted activity. No longer will an employee be shielded from discipline during otherwise protected concerted activity if the employee engages in “profanity-laced speech, as well as racial, ethnic or sexist slurs, or other abusive conduct toward or about management or other employees.”

In Velox Express, the board determined that the misclassification of workers as independent contractors does not constitute a violation of Section 8(a)(1) of the NLRA. An ALJ had ruled that because Velox had misclassified a group of drivers, it had also violated their Section 7 rights. In the article at DLAPiper.com, the authors explain:

“The Board majority held that an employer’s communication to its workers of its opinion that they are independent contractors does not, standing alone, violate the NLRA if that opinion turns out to be mistaken.  The Board reasoned that such communication does not inherently threaten those employees with termination or other adverse action if they engage in activities protected by the NLRA, nor does it communicate that it would be futile for them to engage in such activities…

“To impose liability for an employer’s mistaken belief that an independent contractor classification is proper, the Board reasoned, would unduly chill the creation of independent contractor relationships, which would be contrary to the Congressional intent to preserve independent contractor relationships as reflected by the NLRA.”

The UAW corruption scandal has been headline news for some time. The Department of Labor is proposing new rules designed to hold larger union organizations to a higher standard of scrutiny. According to the proposal, unions with annual receipts of $8 million or more would have to submit a new version of the financial reporting form (the LM-2), called a long-form LM-2, and designated LM-2 LF.  The new disclosure form would require labor organizations to identify any officers or employees who were paid $10,000 or more by the reporting organization and who also received $10,000 or more as an officer or employee of another labor organization in gross salaries, allowances, and other direct and indirect disbursements during the reporting period. The comment period will end around the end of November.

The deadline to comment on the DOL proposed rule with respect to Independent Contractor status is only a few days away. Under the proposed rule, the DOL has retained but modified the current test, focusing on two core factors and identifying three other factors that may serve as additional guideposts. To review the test and the explanation of the factors, this article provides the details. Comments on the proposed rule must be submitted by October 26, 2020, and can be submitted electronically via the Federal Register website.

**********

Laboring Toward 2020

By next month’s issue of INK, we will hopefully know what the next administration will look like, for both the White House and the Senate.  If Joe Biden takes the White House and the Senate flips, huge changes will be on the way for labor law. If you’ve been following the news and reviewing Biden’s labor plan, you know that he is reaching even beyond the ProACT to benefit Big Labor. If the tide shifts in this fashion, as soon as the vote tally is certified, be on the lookout for opportunities to hear from us on what this will mean for employers.

Big Labor has upped their game, especially in key states of Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Florida, and Minnesota, where Steve Rosenthal, a retired ALF-CIO political director, has focused on targeting retired or ex-union members. This Union2020 effort claims to have moved the target audience from a polling margin of 59/24 (Biden over Trump) to 73/21 from last December to mid-September, using mail, email and social media efforts. These last few weeks will have included additional contact via phone.

Meanwhile, the SEIU has run a scam in New Hampshire, texting many Granite Staters that they would receive absentee ballots, and informing them how to complete and submit them. State Attorney General Gordon MacDonald claims the outreach has caused confusion among these voters, as many of them never requested absentee ballots or had already submitted them, or were planning to vote in person.

**********

Covid-19

Even though the NLRB has provided guidance for safely conducting in-person voting for union representation elections, most regional directors and the board itself have been ruling in favor of mail ballot elections in most, if not all, cases where the issue has been raised by the employer.

Labor unions and environmental groups joined together to sue the federal government, claiming a failure to provide adequate reusable respirators, N95 masks, gloves and other personal protective equipment (PPE) to essential workers amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Among the labor organizations involved are the AFL-CIO, United Steelworkers, Service Employees International Union, American Federation of Teachers & Amalgamated Transit Union.

**********

Tech/Media Unions

Journalists at the Dallas Morning News and Al Día voted to organize with the Communication Workers of America this month, making them the most recent in the growing list of media organizations who are now required to bargain with third parties over workplace matters.

**********

Labor Solutions Corner

The new normal of employee communication strategies is here to stay. We have helped many of our clients over the past few months take advantage of online communication via customized campaign communication websites.

This new normal has also forced unions to become more savvy using online communication mediums as well. Websites, texting, and social media strategies are growing in importance.

The good news is, it is more affordable than you think to have customized communication tools set up for any eventuality.

If you’d like to take a quick tour, contact Greg at 800-888-9115 or gkittinger@lrims.com

PS. Being prepared in advance is far better than playing catch up to a surprise campaign!

**********

Who Said IT Folks Have A Limited Sense Of Humor?!

Scott Brister, mastermind of our LRIRightNow database libraries and our in-house IT specialist, recently presided over an LRI employee retirement ceremony. It took us hours to get back to any productive work…!

Mac X. Serve, a faithful, hard-working part of the LRI family, retires today with the gratitude of all of us here and those he served so well over his 14-year tenure hosting the LRI Labor Libraries.

Scott Brister, who has worked alongside Mac X. ever since he was plugged into our workforce, recalls fondly the early days when Mac X. started (up).

“I remember his first day. So anxious to start serving. We couldn’t feed information to him fast enough, he was that eager,” said Brister. “He said he had felt boxed-in before coming to work at LRI. Since then he’s been such a stalwart guy—hardly missing a day in close to 15 years. I don’t know how he did it, frankly, but he definitely served us well.”

Mac X. and Brister had their difficult moments, though. There were times Mac X. was reticent to try new things.

“He didn’t like changes in operating systems, so it was difficult to convince him to update his methods. And he could be a bit of a blowhard, but when you’re going full speed 24/7 for that long, you need something to keep you cool. I mean, it was as if he was always churning at 5400 RPM. Things are definitely going to be a lot quieter around here”.

Brister’s admiration for his long-time work partner is evident in other things. “Sure, he’s hard on the outside, but inside he’s soft—where it’s needed. And what a great sense of humor. I never get tired of his favorite joke:

11000101 0010010?

10011101!

“So funny!” chortled Brister.

In the end, however, it was his inability to understand today’s more demanding security needs that finally made Mac X. realize it was time to ⌘-Q and shut it down.

“Things kinda passed him by,” Brister lamented. “But nothing will outweigh the steadfast, servant attitude of Mac X. I’m going to miss him.”

Mac X. is uncertain how he will spend his retirement. He loves to read and write and read and write and read and write, but isn’t sure if he’ll be able to find a suitable outlet to make that happen.

We all wish him Godspeedtest.

A retirement celebration is scheduled for 10 a.m. in Mac X.’s office. Join us if you like as we tip our glasses to Mac X. and spill coffee on his keyboard one last time.

**********

Union Corruption

On October 1, James Cahill and 11 other officials of the New York State Building and Construction Trades Council were indicted for their part in over $100,000 in bribes from nonunion contractors. By engaging in the sort of pay-for-play, these union leaders essentially willfully neglected their fiduciary duties; and thus, deprived members of the services for which they have paid (via dues).

Cahill at the podium

This month also saw former Health Services Union boss, Kathy Jackson, plead guilty to misappropriating approximately $68,000 in union funds. The same goes for former UAW president, Dennis Williams, who entered a guilty plea for engaging in the embezzling of hundreds of thousands of dollars in union funds.

**********

Union Organizing

Union organizing attempts continue to shift from traditional trade and labor industries to service, white collar, and tech. This month, we saw it play out at a coffee shop in Philly, with an influencer on Instagram, and amongst foster parents in Massachusetts. Follow the links to learn more.

**********

Gig Economy

Uber, Lyft, and other ride-sharing companies continue to take front stage in the gig economy.

The Seattle City Council has backed a new pay formula initiative that would require Uber and Lyft to take into account its drivers expenses and downtime (waiting for passengers) into its pay structure.

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against a group of Massachusetts Uber drivers seeking exemption status from the Federal Arbitration Act. The petitioner argued that because he picks up and drops off passengers from the airport who engage in interstate commerce, that he too engages in interstate commerce, and thus should qualify for FAA exemption. Had he received his exemption status, it would set a precedent that Uber drivers who work the airport may not be required to adhere to the arbitration agreement they signed with the company.

**********

Healthcare

In the last month, there have been two NLRB rulings of note in the healthcare sphere.

The first is that the NLRB was actually wrong when it ordered Crozer-Keystone Health System to disclose to its union their entire sale agreement with Prospect Medical Holdings. The 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with the NLRB that the company owed the union parts of its agreement, but not the agreement in its entirety.

The second ruling, made by the NLRB, is that Holy Cross Hospital in Silver Spring, MD, violated labor law by engaging in anti-union conduct during a 2016 union organizing campaign with the National Nurses United. More details here.

Healthcare strikes continue across the country. The two most notable ones in October so far have included workers at Allina Health in Minnesota and nurses at Alameda Health Systems in Northern California. Both groups of workers are represented by the Service Employees International Union.

Two nursing home chains in Michigan, Ciena and Villa, reached a tentative agreement just in time to avoid a strike by an expected 1,000 workers. And lastly, nurses at the University of Illinois Hospital and clinics also reached a tentative agreement after a week-long strike last month.

**********

LRI Scoreboard

The DOL is behind on data entry, so the Scoreboard will be sent at a later date

**********

Sticky Fingers

Current charges or sentences of embezzling union officials:

  • Michael Oldham – AFGE: $39,000
  • Yvette Luster – NPMHU: $184,138
  • Edward Davis, Jr. – BLET: $61,386

http://nlpc.org/index.php?q=union-corruption-update

**********

LRI exists to help our clients thrive and become extraordinary workplaces. We improve the lives of working people by strengthening relationships with their leaders and each other. For over 40 years LRI has led the labor and employee relations industry, driven by our core values and our proven process, the LRI Way.

Labor Relations INK is published semi-weekly and is edited by Labor Relations Institute, Inc. Feel free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you think might enjoy it.

New subscribers can sign up by visiting: http://lrionline.com/free-stuff/newsletter-signup/

If you use content from this newsletter please attribute it to Labor Relations Institute and include our website address: http://www.LRIonline.com

Contributing editors for this issue: Phillip Wilson, Greg Kittinger, and Meghan Jones

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to receive our labor relations newsletters and updates. You can manage your email preferences by clicking the link at the bottom of any of our email communications.

 

The post Labor Relations INK October 2020 appeared first on Labor Relations Institute.


Labor Relations INK November 2020

$
0
0

In this issue:

  • CoVid-19
  • Tech/Media Unions
  • Organizing
  • Sticky Fingers, Scoreboard, Insight and more…

**********

Labor Relations Insight by Phil Wilson

Biden Labor Policy – What to Expect?

It (finally) appears that we’ve settled on our next President, after enduring an election that was the perfect capstone to 2020. Even though President-elect Biden is all but assured to be sworn in on January 20, the true nature of his labor policy won’t be known for a bit longer. Control of the Senate depends on the outcome of two runoff elections in Georgia on January 5, 2021. And control of the Senate will determine how far Biden can go in his Labor Day commitment to be the “strongest labor president you’ve ever had.”

It’s hard to overstate the importance of the Georgia Senate races. Democrats need to win both seats to win control of the Senate, and control of the Senate is crucial to achieving a lot of Biden’s promises to organized labor. Even winning both seats creates a 50/50 tie in the Senate that must be broken by Vice President-elect Kamala Harris. This means losing even one vote from the Democratic caucus stops most legislative action in its tracks. Let’s look at both scenarios – a Democratic sweep of Georgia’s runoff elections or a Republican victory in one or both races.

If Republicans retain a majority in the Senate, the next two years of the Biden administration will look a lot like the final years of the Bush and Obama second terms – not much happening. At the end of the Bush Administration the Democrat-controlled Senate refused to confirm NLRB members to the Board, resulting in the New Process Steel dispute that ended up with the Supreme Court ruling that a 2-member NLRB lacked a quorum to decide cases. Once Republicans took over control of the Senate in 2014, the same thing happened. NLRB members were no longer getting confirmed.

Currently the Board sits at 4 members, with only one Democrat – Lauren McFerran – on the panel. She will be quickly elevated to the role of Chair, but the Board will effectively remain in Republican control until at least one other Democrat is confirmed. And if you’ve paid any attention to Mitch McConnel’s operation of the Senate (and Harry Reid before him) you know that won’t happen. The most likely scenario in this situation is that the Board drops to a two-member panel (remember that means no quorum) when John Ring’s term expires in 2022. In the meantime, there won’t be a Democrat majority to make any important decisions at the Board. So not much happening at the Board.

Under this scenario Biden’s legislative priorities, like the PRO Act and card-check, will also be dead on arrival at the Senate. Biden will still be able to reverse a number of President Trump’s executive orders related to organizing in the federal government. A new Secretary of Labor (whenever they are seated, which will probably take a while) will be able to begin the work of reversing Trump Administration rulemaking and enforcement guidance, but private sector employers won’t likely see big legislative changes until 2023 at the earliest.

Secretary of Labor Sanders?

What happens if Democrats win both Senate seats? That gets a lot more interesting. With Democrats in control of the Senate they will be able to push through nominations. It still takes a while and the labor-related positions (other than the Secretary of Labor – can you say “Secretary Sanders”?) usually don’t get filled in the earliest part of a new administration. The Senate could confirm one Democrat Board member immediately (the seat formerly filled by Mark Pearce remains open) but it will still be August 2021 before the Senate could confirm a third Democrat Board member that would give the Board a Democrat majority.

In this scenario there is a better chance of Biden’s labor policy promises to become a reality. His platform includes an ambitious number of proposals in addition to the PRO Act, but that is the centerpiece. It is no exaggeration to say that this is the most sweeping labor law reform since the passage of the Landrum Griffin Act in 1959. It is certainly conceivable (I think a near certainty) that if Democrats win the Senate they will abandon the filibuster rule, which will then give them the ability to pass legislation on a straight up-or-down vote. They will have the power to adopt legislation, so the key question is will they be successful?

The problem with the PRO Act, or any ambitious legislative effort, is that it has to pass both houses of Congress. And while the 2020 election managed to vote in Biden as President, Democrats lost seats in the House and will only gain Senate control by literally the thinnest possible margin. If they lose even one vote in the Senate, they can’t get a bill to Biden’s desk.

That’s a big problem. The Democratic caucus is not a monolith. And if they hope to keep control of the Senate, they must look forward to the 2022 mid-term elections that are looming just around the corner. The 2020 election proved that while a majority of Americans may have grown tired of Trump, there is certainly not a mandate for the legislative vision of Democrats. Further, there are a number of vulnerable Democrats with seats at risk in 2022. Mid-term elections are rarely favorable to the President’s party (they weren’t for Trump) so if Democrats wish to retain or build on their control of the Senate they’ll probably have to tread lightly over the next 2 years.

In addition to this, there is some skepticism in labor circles about just how committed Biden is to their policies. While Biden talks a good game, so did Obama. And Big Labor remembers how they got burned on the Employee Free Choice Act which got sidelined in Obama’s first term (when Democrats controlled 60 seats in the Senate). Biden won his party’s nomination as a centrist, and while his platform is certainly more liberal than any before him there is a lot of concern that he will govern more from the center.

There is no doubt that Biden is a big supporter of unions – his transition teams are full of union leaders from every major union. How much political capital will Biden spend to satisfy his labor friends at the expense of private sector businesses? Businesses that are struggling through a pandemic economy that could be in a double-dip recession by the time he takes office. It’s a good question, and if history is any guide there is reason to see why labor leaders are wringing their hands.

**********

Union Bailout Update

The National Labor Relations Board has become more efficient, reducing the backlog of pending cases by 46%. At the end of fiscal 2019, the median age of pending cases was 157 days, compared to 85 days a year later.

Since the outbreak of the CoVid pandemic, the board has been conducting most elections via mail ballot. Although the board attempted to set parameters for the allowance of manual elections, regional directors have denied almost all requests. Early this month, the board outlined how it believes mail ballot election decisions should be made. Whereas regional directors had been denying manual ballot elections simply due to “extraordinary circumstances presented by the COVID-19 pandemic at this time,” in Aspirus Keweenaw, the board laid out six situations that will require a mail ballot election:

  1. The agency office tasked with conducting the election is operating under “mandatory telework” status
  2. Either a 14-day trend in the number of new confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the county where the facility is located is increasing, or the 14-day testing positivity rate in the county where the facility is located is 5% or higher
  3. The proposed manual election site cannot be established in a way that avoids violating mandatory state or local health orders relating to maximum gathering size
  4. The employer fails or refuses to commit to abide by the GC Memo 20-10 protocols
  5. There is a current COVID-19 outbreak at the facility or the employer refuses to disclose and certify its current status
  6. Other similarly compelling considerations

Yes, number 6 does appear to provide a loophole, but at least regional directors will have to be more creative in finding an excuse for forcing a mail ballot.

The board found that a media policy at a Maine hospital system violated the NLRA. When a nurse sent a letter to the editor of a local newspaper lauding the efforts of a nurses union in response to hospital staff reductions, the hospital fired her. The NLRB upheld her unfair labor practice filing, but went further by finding the policy for which she was fired for violating was itself a violation of the NLRA.

Sightings of Scabby the Rat as a symbol of union protest may become more rare. The NLRB posted a notice and invitation to file briefs, answering four questions related to overturning precedent on allowing Scabby to appear as protest before neutral employers.  Briefs must be received by the board by December 28th.

When hotel workers in Chicago attempted to form “micro units,” the D.C. Circuit Court overruled a willingness on the part of the NLRB to allow them to do so. In this case, the board seemed to ignore the “community of interest” precedent.

The NLRB approved an employers request to withdraw from a stipulated election agreement, as a result of unforeseen developments related to the pandemic. The union and employer entered into the agreement on March 4, just prior to the suspension of all elections by the board. By the time elections resumed, the employer had hired and additional 230 workers and laid off some in the original bargaining unit due to pandemic developments, and requested withdrawal from the election. The regional director denied the request but the board overruled, confirming that an “unusual circumstance” did indeed exist.

**********

SCORE BOARD

Who are the winners (and losers) of the labor movement? Don’t guess, just check the LRI Scoreboard

View this month’s scoreboard (archives also located here).

Download a PDF of this month’s scoreboard

**********

Covid-19

Worker safety remains at the top of the list of CoVid-impacted labor issues. SHRM released a great article last week on current OSHA guidelines, as well as other things for employers to consider as we continue to navigate living and working during a pandemic. Check that out here.

Due to safety considerations, some states offered grant programs for essential employees who worked during lockdown periods earlier this year. However, in order for workers to receive the hazard pay, their employers must first apply to the program. In Vermont, many employers have not done so, putting them at odds with their employees.

Worker safety and healthcare coverage are also key issues in many of the strikes we’re seeing across the country. Toledo Coca-Cola workers are a recent example of this.

And then of course, we have the issue of generally keeping business running and workers working. Southwest Airlines issued notices for what could be the company’s first round of involuntary furloughs in the company’s 49-year history.

**********

Tech/Media Unions

Staff at Bustle Digital Group announced their intention to form a union with the Writers Guild of America last month. This makes BDG the latest in a wave of unionization efforts at media companies this year (Hearst Magazines, NBC News, Sports Illustrated).

Bustle Media Group publications include Bustle, Romper, Mic, Nylon, and Elite Daily.

********** 

Organizing

Employees at Rieth-Riley Construction Company have been petitioning the NLRB to remove the Operating Engineers Local 324 as their union since April. Finally, the petition was approved and a decertification election by mail was scheduled to run from October to November 9th.

Hours before the ballots were set to be counted, the Regional Director dismissed the petition due to unresolved allegations that the union made against the company. This is essentially a ‘blocking charge’ at play.

A blocking charge is a ULP charge ‘alleging unlawful conduct that might interfere with an employees’ ability to make a free and fair choice of representation.’

In the past, when a blocking charge was filed, the pending election was dismissed until the charges were resolved, but as it became more widely known that unions were filing blocking charges as a means to delay elections that they feared they may not win, it became clear that the policy needed to change.

And change it did, earlier this year. The new rule states that, even when a blocking charge is filed, the election must continue, but representation changes may be delayed until the resolution of the charge. So why then, was the decertification election at Rieth-Riley dismissed?

Employees at the company have petitioned the NLRB to overturn the regional director’s decision and have the votes counted as they stand.

**********

Union Corruption

Most of the stories we report on under union corruption have more to do with greedy leadership than anything else. But at the root of all union corruption stories is a failure of the union to fairly represent its members. This is just as true in embezzlement cases as it is in cases like the recent decision against the Teamsters, where the Board ruled that the Teamsters union violated labor law when it attempted to keep its member from participating in a workplace investigation.

The investigation was inquiring into allegations that a union leader verbally harassed a coworker, who was also represented by the union. It was more important to the Teamsters to protect the local president than it was to represent the member. No big surprise.

Joe Ashton

Recent embezzlement news includes two former union business managers. One worked for the Laborers and was sentenced last month for stealing over $50,000. The other was with the Electrical Workers, and he got away with $10,000 from his local, until he didn’t.

And for a quick update on the UAW/GM/FCA scandal, Joe Ashton, former Vice President of the UAW, was sentenced this month to two and a half years in prison for taking $250,000 in bribes. Also, the training center at the center of the scandal has sold for a whopping $34 million. More details here.

**********

Gig Economy 

Proposition 22 passed in California this month, overturning the state’s worker classification law that said all gig-economy workers must be treated as full-time employees. Those same workers are now officially independent contractors again and, potentially, for good. This means that they do not receive the same benefits as full-time employees, but they also do not have the same obligations as full-time employees. They decide when they work, where they work, and for how long they work.

Proponents of this type of system argue that if that kind of freedom and flexibility is not what you’re looking for, then this is not the industry for you. It’s as simple as that. However, that’s not enough to stop opponents from continuing to infiltrate the industry on behalf of ‘worker rights.’

At what point does “securing worker rights” end up hurting workers more? Specifically, in the case of the gig economy, the answer is when the company files for bankruptcy; which is exactly what happened in Canada when Foodora, a food-delivery company, closed after being forced to recognize its workforce as employees and provide all the benefits that come with it. This business model simply isn’t sustainable that way. It’s too expensive.

As far as the US is concerned, rumor has it that Uber intends to push for similar legislation as Prop 22 in other states. Meanwhile, the Department of Labor is working on its own worker classification regulation.

**********

Labor Around the World

Italy may see a national strike today by public sector workers in healthcare, education, and transport. The strike was called by the USI trade union and intends to bring attention to worker rights, safety in the workplace, and the privatization of public services.

Many workers in Italy’s private sector are taken aback by the intent to strike as they believe it is really the private sector (small businesses and the self-employed) who are struggling the most right now due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

**********

Sticky Fingers

Current charges or sentences of embezzling union officials:

  • Joe Ashton - UAW: $250,000
  • Christopher Roberts, Earl Graham, Jaime Ruggiero, Shawn Martindale, Torey Gannon - UA: $65,000
  • Arthur Penn - FOP: $400,000
  • Aja Jasmin - UFCW:  $190,000
  • Charles Farris - AFT:  $35,000
  • KaSandra Hall - AFGE:  $12,765

http://nlpc.org/index.php?q=union-corruption-update

**********

Labor Relations INK is published semi-weekly and is edited by Labor Relations Institute, Inc. Feel free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you think might enjoy it.

New subscribers can sign up by visiting: http://lrionline.com/free-stuff/newsletter-signup/

If you use content from this newsletter please attribute it to Labor Relations Institute and include our website address: http://www.LRIonline.com

Contributing editors for this issue: Phillip Wilson, Greg Kittinger, and Meghan Jones

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to receive our labor relations newsletters and updates. You can manage your email preferences by clicking the link at the bottom of any of our email communications.

NOTE: if you are using older versions of Internet Explorer, read the text version, as the html may not load properly. We recommend upgrading to the latest version.

 

The post Labor Relations INK November 2020 appeared first on Labor Relations Institute.

Labor Relations INK January 2021

$
0
0

In this issue:

  • Online Union Calculators
  • Union Corruption
  • Collective Action
  • Insight, Scoreboard, Sticky Fingers and more…

**********

Labor Relations Insight by Phil Wilson

This month’s insight will be brief. If that’s not unusual enough, it’s also going to begin with a pitch. Then I’ll briefly reflect on President Biden’s unprecedented actions at the NLRB.

First the pitch. If you are reading this and aren’t a subscriber of LRI Rightnow you have no excuse. I’m so proud of the product our team has developed and continues to improve almost daily. It’s hands down the best source of up-to-the-minute labor relations data and research on earth. It costs nothing to subscribe.

LRI Rightnow features numerous free libraries, including daily petitions reports (other services charge hundreds of dollars a month for these), a “one-click” way to find union LM financial data, interactive maps, and real-time updates of our popular union scoreboard. The paid libraries allow you to dig into the most comprehensive online database (over 500,000 records) that you can now geo-locate and map. One of my goals for this quarter is to make sure the labor relations world knows about this incredible resource. Now that you know – the next step is to sign up for an account and you can do that here.

Joe Biden certainly hit the ground running on the labor front. I expected him to take action quickly and thought there was a chance he would make the unprecedented move to remove Peter Robb from the General Counsel’s position. What I didn’t expect was that he would make this move (plus terminating GC Robb’s Deputy Alice Stock) on days one and two of the new administration.

These moves leave no question that Biden intends to live up to his campaign promise of being the most pro-union President in history. These moves are some great red meat to his Big Labor supporters. But they may have the unintended consequence of slowing his labor agenda to a crawl.

When I say unprecedented, I mean literally the first time in the history of the National Labor Relations Act. Twenty-three minutes after Biden took the oath of office the Administration notified General Counsel Robb that he must resign or be terminated that evening. Robb refused to resign and was terminated. The next day the Administration moved Alice Stock, the Deputy General Counsel, into the General Counsel position and she received the same ultimatum. Acting GC Stock also refused to resign and was terminated.

Neither General Counsel Robb nor Ms. Stock received any explanation for why they were fired. This move is extremely troubling. The NLRB General Counsel position was created to be independent from outside influences. General Counsels are nominated by the President and subject to the advice, consent, and confirmation procedures of the Senate for set four-year terms.

Not only is this the first time a General Counsel (or Acting GC) has been terminated by the President, at least eight other Presidents have left the prior General Counsel (including both Presidents Trump and Obama) in place to serve out their full terms.

The Biden Administration’s actions are not just unprecedented, they are probably illegal. There have been numerous arguments floated to justify the President’s right to terminate the General Counsel. None of these are persuasive. The duties of the NLRB General Counsel are not executive level, policymaking duties. The duties of the NLRB General Counsel are essentially prosecutorial in nature. They do not fit into any of the Supreme Court cases that allow a President to terminate a sitting appointed position.

Not only that, but this week the Administration named a Regional Director from Chicago (the same Regional Director who thought college football players should be considered employees of their college) to the Acting General Counsel role. This creates a fact situation akin to the one in Southwest Ambulance where the Supreme Court ruled that an unusual appointment to the General Counsel’s role was unlawful. That decision resulted in hundreds of NLRB actions being ruled unlawful. It created a litigation and bureaucratic nightmare. Looks like we’re right back in that quagmire as well.

While these moves probably led to some high fives in the offices of Big Labor officials, none of this bodes well for the Administration’s labor agenda. They guarantee litigation, including quite possibly a fight over the Executive Branch’s authority that Democrats might prefer to avoid with the current makeup of the Supreme Court. It probably means a pitched battle over the Secretary of Labor’s nomination and any future NLRB nominees. And it puts every NLRB decision over the next several years at risk of being overturned over a completely avoidable (and foreseeable) unforced error.

One thing I never thought I’d say is that I miss 2020. But the way this year started I almost think I do. I know elections have consequences, and I fully expect the Administration to aggressively pursue a strong pro-labor agenda. They should do that, it’s what they promised. But this is a terrible way to begin an Administration that’s supposed to be dedicated to unity and coming together. President Biden can still do the right thing. Consider the legal quagmire he just created – and the likely long term negative impact on accomplishing his goals – and reinstate Mr. Robb and Ms. Stock for the brief few months remaining in their term.

**********

Union Bailout Update

The recent BMW Manufacturing Co. decision continues the Trump NLRB trend to more leniency in evaluating company handbook policies, stemming from the 2017 Boeing Co. ruling. In BMW, the board reversed an ALJ finding, giving the green light to the following Standards of Conduct outlined in the handbook:

  1. requiring employees to “[d]emonstrate respect for the Company” and “[n]ot engage in behavior that reflects negatively on the Company”;
  2. instructing employees to “[n]ot use threatening or offensive language”;
  3. prohibiting use of “personal recording devices…[and][unapproved] use [of] business recording devices within BMW MC facilities”; and
  4. requiring that any information the employer had not released to the general public must be treated as confidential.

President Biden

Good news for now, but it’s likely the Biden board will begin to unravel the more lenient attitude the board has taken toward employer handbook provisions.

A December 7th ruling is a good reminder that an employee’s reasons for engaging in workplace advocacy or other protected activity —however arguably self-motivated—are immaterial to the objective determination of whether the conduct warrants protection under Section 7 of the Act. In this very complicated case, the employee in question was terminated by the employer for evading investigatory questions and lying. Even though the employer claimed that his conduct outside of the scope of protected activity justified their action, the board ruled in favor of the employee.

On January 6th the Department of Labor issued its final rule on who is an independent contractor, finally bringing needed clarity to this issue. Unfortunately, the Biden administration has already asked federal agencies to freeze proposed and pending regulations.

The rule reaffirms an economic-reality test to determine whether an individual is in business for himself or herself—an independent contractor—or is economically dependent on a business for work. Someone in the latter category would be an employee covered by the FLSA.

Under the final rule, two core factors are integral to determining whether someone is an independent contractor:

  • The nature and degree of control over the work.
  • The worker’s opportunity for profit or loss based on initiative and investment.

Three other factors that may serve as additional guideposts in the analysis are:

  • The amount of skill required for the work.
  • The degree of permanence of the working relationship between the worker and the potential employer.
  • Whether the work is part of an integrated unit of production.

The actual practice of the worker and the business is more relevant than what may be contractually or theoretically possible.

Labor lawyers are mixed over their belief whether the new rule will withstand meddling from the new administration.

President Biden wasted no time in putting his stamp on the direction of labor law. On his first day in office, Biden fired NLRB General Counsel Peter Robb, and sent notice to Robb’s replacement, Assistant General Counsel Alice Stock, asking her to resign or face the same fate.

Marty Walsh

The President then selected Boston Mayor Marty Walsh as his Labor secretary. Walsh is a former union official, and has been accused of involvement in extortion while in his role as the head of the Boston Building and Construction Trades Council. Biden pointed to California Labor Secretary Julie Su for the role of deputy secretary under Walsh.  Su has been criticized for failing to prevent rampant unemployment fraud and lengthy delays in processing of claims, which may make her confirmation anything but a shoo-in.

The President then wielded the sword of executive order to begin stripping many of the efficiency reforms enacted within the federal government by the prior administration. Biden minced no words in Section 1 of the order, stating “It is also the policy of the United States to encourage union organizing and collective bargaining.”  (One wonders where in the Constitution that came from!) In addition to the revocation of prior orders and the disbandment of the Interagency Labor Relations Working Group, the order including a push to have all agency heads and their subordinates engage in collective bargaining and a move to bump the minimum wage for all federal employees to $15/hour.

Biden also rescinded President Trumps Executive Order 13950, which limited diversity and inclusion training for federal contractors.  A preliminary injunction had been issued against the Order, so federal contractors are now released from the uncertainty of their actions related to such training.

There is plenty of speculation around how the labor policy landscape may evolve.  Below are a few articles that list a host of possibilities. It seems too early to attempt a synthesis, so we’ll just list the articles for your perusal:

**********

COVID-19

For employers who manage a unionized workforce, it is important to remember that even though you technically can mandate a vaccine in your workplace, you cannot do it without first bargaining with your workers union. Specifically, according to labor law expert Jill Lashay,

“If you unilaterally implement a mandatory vaccine policy when it’s not been addressed in your current collective bargaining agreement, that may lead to a successful unfair labor practice charge against the employer.” More details here.

The EEOC originally provided guidance on how to handle a pandemic in the workplace during the H1N1 outbreak. They have updated their recommendations to address COVID-19. You can find the publication, which is organized into an easy-to-navigate FAQ format, here.

Since the start of the pandemic through the end of 2020, OSHA issued citations totaling almost $4 million in proposed penalties for pandemic violations. Top violations include failures to:

  • Implement a written respiratory protection program;
  • Provide a medical evaluation training for proper use of PPE;
  • Report an injury, illness or fatality;
  • Record an injury or illness on proper OSHA recordkeeping forms; and
  • Comply with the General Duty Clause of the OSHA Act of 1970.

The NLRB has issued two more advice memos on remote bargaining and hazard pay during the pandemic. They include:

  1. Good faith bargaining may not require remote negotiations; and
  2. An employer need not agree to reopen contract for hazard pay negotiations

And lastly on the pandemic front, the effect of COVID-19 on mental health in both on-site and remote workers is becoming hard to ignore. Research suggests and intuition assumes that the hardest hit are the frontline healthcare workers; but even among the general workforce, the data indicates a higher risk of symptoms of anxiety or depression, increased substance abuse, and general difficulty coping with stress.

**********

Labor Solutions Corner

New: Free Online Union Calculators Webpage!

For years, LRI offered physical strike calculators for use during union organizing campaigns.  Employees could select their wage rate and length of a strike, and then use the “slide-rule” type calculator to figure out how much money they could lose during a strike.

No more shipping of paper calculators!  We’ve put up a mobile-friendly Union Calculators webpage, with three different calculators. Employees can first calculate how much dues they would pay each year, then take a look at how much future income they could lose by calculating how much that same money could earn them if invested in a company 401(k). They can then calculate how big of a hit to their wallet a strike might be, including figuring in the out-of-pocket cost of continuing their health benefits during a strike.

This is a public webpage!  Bookmark the site and feel free to use it as needed:

www.unioncalculators.com

NOTE:  Anyone with a smartphone can access the calculators.

**********

Tech/Media Unions

The biggest news in tech and media this month is the formation of Google’s Alphabet Workers Union, a minority union partnered with the Communication Workers of America. As a minority union, AWU has not organized for collective bargaining rights through the NLRB. Rather, for now, they are simply a group of Alphabet employees and contractors who are rallying together to stand against and for social issues affected by the tech giant. Whether or not the group uses this collaboration as a stepping stone to formal representation remains to be seen.

In Texas, the newspaper industry has seen a jump in union membership. When 2020 began there were zero newspaper unions in the state. Today, there are two: one at the Dallas Morning News and another at the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. These two newspapers are the first Texas newsrooms to organize in modern times. The last unionized newspaper in the state, the San Antonio Light, closed in 1993.

**********

SCORE BOARD

Who are the winners (and losers) of the labor movement? Don’t guess, just check the LRI Scoreboard

View this month’s scoreboard (archives also located here).

Download a PDF of this month’s scoreboard

**********

Union Corruption

The National Legal and Policy Center put out their annual roundup of the Top Ten Union Corruption Stories of 2020. In addition to the noise of embezzlement that we’ve come to expect from those in union leadership positions, 2020 also saw quite a few large hauls of benefit fraud. Details here.

Speaking of benefit fraud and onto the news of today, five former employees of the Carpenters Council in New Jersey have filed suit against the organization, claiming that they were fired last March for supporting a union official who reported the theft of $1.5 million in benefits to law enforcement.

And early this month, John S. Romero, former president of the United Industrial Service Workers of America, was sentenced to 12 years in prison for his part in embezzling $800,000 from the union’s health plan.

********** 

Off (or On) The Beaten Path…

Forgive us a moment to brag about one of our team members, Laura Wright.  Laura works with our LRIRightnow data libraries, and also volunteered to oversee our team fitness challenge. Just before the pandemic broke out, we had distributed FitBits to everyone, and created a database to track our steps and other fitness activities each week as a way to encourage each other to make health a key objective for 2020. Who knew only weeks later the pandemic would drive most people to the couch to binge on Netflix episodes?!

We started by walking west the length of Route 66, then reversed course to take on the Lincoln Highway. During that project, Laura contacted the Lincoln Highway Association to inform them of our virtual hike, and the Association chose to publish Laura’s description of our adventure in their Quarterly Journal.

Here is the article as published in the Fall 2020 edition of The Lincoln Highway Forum:

In February 2020, the company I work for, Labor Relations Institute, Inc. decided it was time to implement a Wellness Campaign for our employees. I gave a presentation about what a Wellness Campaign is and what we as employees could do to create a wellness attitude. This does not just mean not being free from illness but encompasses many aspects of life, health, wealth, emotional health, less stress, etc.

 

We decided that one way to encourage our employees in this new Wellness Campaign was to count our walking steps. So, we came up with our first Walking Challenge. Using our SmartTrackers, iWatch, and FitBits we are all able to keep track of our individual steps. As a group we would virtually walk the length of Route 66. We are headquartered in Oklahoma and many miles of Rt 66 run through our city. We thought this would be a fun way to connect as a team and also learn a little about the Route and the places we ‘walked’ through.

 

This Walking Challenge was a virtual walk, we all kept track of our steps and then converted them into miles every week. I would plot the miles on a big map we hung in the break room. It took a couple of months to complete this challenge.

 

The next Walking Challenge was your Lincoln Highway. I used your Lincoln Highway map on your website to plot the route and also used the Places of Interest in emails and zoom meetings to indicate where on the LH we, as a company, were. When we started our Wellness Campaign we were all in the office and going to gyms, parks and other recreational places to get our step in, then the Coronavirus hit and we were all sent home to work. We kept up our step tracking at home, walking in the neighborhood, home workouts, and sometimes walking in place.

 

We started at the Golden Gate Bridge on May 13, 2020 and completed the Lincoln Highway Walking Challenge this week arriving in New York City’s Times Square. Clearly, we never left our own state or city, but I now want to take a road trip on the great Lincoln Highway.

 

Some of our weekly plots were: Donner Pass, CA; Hamilton, NV; Salt Lake City, UT; Point of Rocks, WY; Cozad, NE (the halfway point); South Bend, IN; Lima, OH; North Braddock, PA; Princeton, PA; NYC, NY.

Since we were working from home we have been holding bi-weekly zoom meetings and I would use those meetings to tell the group where on the LH we were. My favorites were the Donner Pass and Cozad. For these places, I dressed up for the meetings (pics attached). At Donner Pass my character was a survivor from the party and I told a brief story of the troubles. Then for Cozad, NE, I dressed loosely like a member of the band Bon Jovi and played the song, ‘Livin’ on a Prayer’ “we’re half way there”. The team loved it and now I think I might have set the bar a little high.

 

I know that we did not actually travel the Lincoln Highway but I know I learned a lot about it and the many places we ‘walked’ through. Thank you for having the map – that was a great asset. Now we at LRI are on to our next Walking Challenge.

Footnote:  In case you’re wondering, we are now following the meandering trail that travel author Peter Jenkins trekked to write the 1979 book, A Walk Across America. (Green line).

Break Room Map

**********

It’s All Academic

More than 130 professional and clerical staff at Augsburg University in Minneapolis, Minnesota voted to form a union this month, making them the first unionized professional staff at a private college in the state. The campaign was almost entirely organized remotely through zoom meetings, phone calls, text, social media, and email.

**********

Collective Action

No time like during a pandemic to make use of a strike, when the roles of essential workers are highlighted and heightened.

2020 saw a resurgence of strikes as a key labor tactic around the world. From traditional labor rights in healthcare workers, transportation and warehousing, and gig workers, to social justice causes in tech, protests abound and were apparently mostly successful.

**********

Healthcare

If ever a time were ripe for unionizing healthcare workers, this is it. From PPE shortages to low staffing levels to deaths among coworkers, the COVID-19 pandemic has created incredible tension in the industry. Some sources say they are noticing an uptick in union interest among healthcare workers, but whether or not an uptick in interest actually leads to an uptick in membership remains to be seen.

Meanwhile, after voting to join SEIU District 1199 in the largest organizing effort since Virginia implemented its right-to-work law, nurses and NP’s at Cabell Huntington Hospital have approved their first union contract; and a hospital in Houston, Texas is offering a $500 bonus to employees who get the COVID-19 vaccine.

**********

Alt-Labor

Minority unions were on the rise in 2020. A minority union is essentially “an organization made up of groups of individuals (including traditional employees, temporary employees, and even contractors) who seek to advocate for worker rights and social justice issues in the 21st century workplace.” While many of these minority unions are aligning themselves with more traditional Big Labor unions, they are not technically represented by these unions nor are they granted collective bargaining rights.

That said, employers should take them seriously. Follow this link for a detailed rundown of important employer considerations for minority unions. A few of the top ones include:

  • Minority unions are protected under Section 7 of the NLRA and taking adverse action against employees who engage in such conduct is unlawful.
  • Bargaining with minority unions is also unlawful. There is a fine line here between listening and responding to the concerns of your workers without ‘direct dealing.’
  • Many of the minority unions are centered around social justice causes. Be careful how you position yourself, so as not to create larger issues down the road.

**********

Minimum Rising

Newly-inaugurated President Biden signed an Executive Order last week instructing the Department of Labor to provide guidance on raising the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour. Similar recommendations are also included in the President’s Covid-19 relief package.

Additionally, 74 jurisdictions are already scheduled for a wage increase by the end of this year.

**********

Labor Around the World

The United States, Mexico, Canada Agreement included in it a clause that asked Mexico to adjust its labor laws to make the collective bargaining process more fair for workers. In the first report from an independent body set up to monitor compliance with the USMCA, investigators identified a number of serious concerns about how well Mexico is implementing the agreed upon changes.

Canada has seen a renewed interest in organizing amidst the pandemic according to Unifor president Jerry Dias. He points to the auto industry, grocery, retail, and restaurants as the primary drivers. Similarly, the US has seen a significant spike in interest coming from workers on the frontlines.

**********

Sticky Fingers

Current charges or sentences of embezzling union officials:

  • Scott Rodgers – NPMH:  $184,138
  • Hasan Zahdeh – NUHW:  $15,000
  • Sarah Geddes Holmes – IAM:  $300,000
  • Tyrone Johnson – AFSCME:  $1,500
  • Dorothy Jordan – AFSCME:  $25,000
  • Michael Johnson – IBEW:  $9,317

http://nlpc.org/index.php?q=union-corruption-update

**********

Labor Relations INK is published semi-weekly and is edited by Labor Relations Institute, Inc. Feel free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you think might enjoy it.

New subscribers can sign up by visiting: http://lrionline.com/free-stuff/newsletter-signup/

If you use content from this newsletter please attribute it to Labor Relations Institute and include our website address: http://www.LRIonline.com

Contributing editors for this issue: Phillip Wilson, Greg Kittinger, and Meghan Jones

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to receive our labor relations newsletters and updates. You can manage your email preferences by clicking the link at the bottom of any of our email communications.

NOTE: if you are using older versions of Internet Explorer, read the text version, as the html may not load properly. We recommend upgrading to the latest version.

 

The post Labor Relations INK January 2021 appeared first on Labor Relations Institute.

Labor Relations INK February 2021

$
0
0

In this issue:

  • Organizing in Blaseball
  • NLRB GC Policy Directives Reversed
  • Biden Balancing Environmental vs. Union Concerns
  • Expedited Hi-Tech Jobs Shift
  • More Union-Mob Ties
  • Sticky Fingers, Insight and more…

**********

Labor Relations Insight by Phil Wilson

2020 Review and Innovative Organizing in 2021

The team at LRI RightNow just released our 2020 annual elections review. There are lots of interesting tidbits in this year’s report. Here are a few of the highlights that intrigued me.

Unions racked up 31,610 newly organized workers in 2020 in just over 800 NLRB elections. The pandemic obviously dramatically impacted petition and election activity – total elections were down 31% over 2019. What struck me was that in a year where a ton of elections occurred by mail ballot the union win-rate in RC elections dropped nearly 5%. Here is an excerpt from the report

The 5 most active unions this year don’t really have any surprises. Here’s that chart:

What did surprise me was a few of the unions that round out the top 10, including one union that went 17 for 17 in elections in 2020. Curious who that was? You’ll have to get the report to find out 

One of the centerpieces of election reforms during the Obama administration was making it easy for unions to organize micro-units. A micro-unit is where a union can show majority support in a small work group, carved out of a larger group of workers. As soon as the NLRB has a Democrat majority – most likely this fall – it is probable that micro-unit elections will be back. And that bodes well for unions, as you can see from this chart in the elections review:

Last year unions won almost 80% of the 257 elections conducted in these small units of 10 or fewer eligible voters. Even though these elections were in small units, they were not micro-units. That’s because the NLRB reversed the prior administration’s rule and said elections must occur in units where employees share a community of interest.

You can anticipate that a Democrat-majority Board will flip the standard back to the “overwhelming community of interest” standard, where the union gets to pick any group of workers it wants, and that unit can only be expanded if the company can prove that the micro-unit shares overwhelming similarities to other excluded workers. That means you will see a lot more elections in the smaller units under 25 employees, where unions are the most successful in converting petitions to election victories.

Those are just a few of the things I thought were standouts in this year’s review. You can also see how unions fared in your industry, in your region, and using the interactive maps feature you can even see how they fared anywhere near one of your locations. It’s a tremendous resource. Pick yours up today!

Innovative Organizing

Unions have kicked off 2021 with a number of interesting innovations. One trend we’ve been following is the launch of some off the beaten path organizing vehicles. The one that stands out the most to me is a site called Unit Workers that attempts to turn traditional NLRB organizing into an app-based experience. The basic idea is that a group of workers sign up on the website to organize a group of peers. They can then use the site to survey coworkers, get them to sign authorization cards, and get the organizing process working. In the background there is legal and professional organizing support, but the “union” doing the organizing is an independent one-site union.

Once a group of workers organizes under the model, they pay the company (interestingly they are NOT considering themselves a union) 0.8% of their monthly pay in fees to the website while they negotiate their labor agreement. In exchange they receive legal and strategy support provided from the app company. This one is fascinating, and they’ve already filed at least one NLRB petition. That petition ended up being withdrawn, but the workers in that case received legal representation from across the country (the petition was filed in Seattle, but the attorney handling the case on behalf of the “union” was in Boston). We’ll see whether this model gains additional traction, but it is fascinating and shows a lot of innovative spirit.

A couple of others also caught my eye this month. Social media “influencers” are now eligible for union representation thanks to SAG-AFTRA. Now your favorite TikTok, Instagram or Twitch star might also be carrying a union card. In another innovative move SAG-AFTRA created an Influencer Agreement which gives anyone paid to advertise on their social media platform the option to join SAG-AFTRA and gain access to health and pension benefits like those offered to actors and other entertainment business workers.

And if TikTok stars unionizing isn’t crazy enough for you, how about organizing in Blaseball? That’s not a typo, and I had to look it up, so if you already know what Blaseball is you’re way cooler than me. For those who don’t know, it’s a splort… well, just go here and see if you can figure out what it is. The reason this is in our humble labor relations newsletter is that the Wobblies creatively jumped onto some organizing activity inside the Blaseball universe. As best I can tell in Blaseball you often try to get a bunch of other people to get together with you to sabotage the other team – kind of like the Gamestop runup (you know, #stonks). The Wobblies are trying to use this as a jumping off point to teach players to organize here in the real world. I’m pretty sure this is one of the signs of the apocalypse, but I do think it’s also evidence of how unions are more and more a part of the zeitgeist of the 2020’s.

Will any of these developments lead to a lot of new organizing? I don’t think so. But I think they are really important to watch. Unions have talked about needing to innovate for decades. The talk is turning to walk.

**********

Union Bailout Update

The removal of NLRB General Counsel, Peter Robb, by the Biden administration was unprecedented. Some have predicted that legal challenges to his forced removal could impede the Biden board, but apparently the pro-union steamroller is working up momentum.

Ten of Robb’s individual policy directives have been rescinded by acting GC Peter Ohr. Directives related to analysis of the Boeing decision, neutrality agreements, and some that tightened requirements for unions were among those targeted in Ohr’s initial actions. In mid-February, Jennifer Abruzzo received the nomination as the next NLRB General Counsel.

The NLRB’s 2019 Caesar Entertainment ruling allowing employer restrictions of union-related employee email is facing a legal test in a T-Mobile case. The board upheld the propriety of employer restrictions in an April 2020 ruling, but the Communications Workers appealed the decision to the D.C. Circuit.

In a divided decision, the NLRB expanded protections for workers who initiated a “wildcat” strike during contract negotiations. What appeared to tip the decision in favor of the workers was the filing of a grievance by a union steward on behalf of the dismissed employees, though the employees struck without original approval by the union.

Employers received another social media policy reprieve when the NLRB overturned an Administrative Law Judge’s decision on January 25th. Among the provisions upheld:

  • Prohibition on disclosure of proprietary or confidential information of the employer or co-workers.
  • Limitations on an employee’s use of the employer’s name, logo, trademarks, or other symbols in social media to endorse, promote, denigrate or otherwise comment on any product, opinion, cause or person.
  • Prohibition on posting of photos of coworkers without their written consent.
  • Prohibition on use of social media to disparage the employer or others.
  • Prohibition of “inappropriate communications” generally on social media.

It’s reasonable to expect a Biden board will unravel these guidelines in the near future.

To close, a few more prognostications about the direction of the Biden DOL:

**********

Covid-19

The CoVid-19 pandemic is having an impact on union strength at the bargaining table. Bloomberg Law reports that union wage hikes were down nearly one percent into 2021.

The Families First Coronavirus Response Act, which required certain employers to provide employees paid leave for a series of qualifying reasons, including childcare, quarantine, and COVID-19 symptoms, lapsed on December 31, 2020. Biden’s current proposal does include some qualified paid leave, but it remains to be seen what any final bills will look like.

**********

Biden Dancing A Jig

President Biden is facing the inevitable clash of trying to reconcile his aggressive pro-union agenda with actions supposedly designed to push a Green agenda. Democrats are initiating new legislation that supposedly promote zero-emission infrastructure, while laden with pro-union shackles that the business community believes are not reasonable or will do irreparable damage to many sectors of the economy, particularly smaller businesses. Biden’s moves to freeze new oil leasing on public lands and cancel the Keystone XL pipeline already had the business community, and unions, up in arms. Many of the unions that ardently supported the Biden campaign are lining up against threats to other pipelines and oil and gas industry infrastructure jobs.

**********

AI, Technology, and Labor

The steady progression of replacing manual labor with technology received a kick-in-the-seat-of-the-pants by the pandemic. Andy Van Kleunen, CEO of the National Skills Coalition, a policy research group that promotes workforce training, put it this way: “We’ve fast-forwarded 10 years of change in the space of less than 10 months.” According to the World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs survey, forty-three percent of businesses anticipate reducing their workforce because of new technology.

Although the number of new jobs created by new technologies balances or surpasses those lost, the issue is job training, especially given the accelerated pace. Thus far pandemic relief packages have contained no earmarks for training, and it will likely be a difficult fight to create any legislation that does.

**********

Tech/Media Unions

Just five years ago, Gawker Media became the first digital news outlet to organize a union. It was a slow burn at first, but in the last two years we’ve seen this movement gain significant momentum among some of the largest publishing platforms online. Early this month, employees at Medium announced their intention to do the same.

Traditional news outlets are following suit. Workers at New York Daily News organized with the NewsGuild of New York and have asked the News’ parent company, Tribune Publishing, to voluntarily recognize the union.

**********

Union Corruption

Last October, James Cahill, former president of the New York State Building and Construction Trades Council, was indicted for solicitation of bribery. Now a new filing is alleging his “extensive ties to organized crime.” Learn more here.

In late January, another former Auto Worker leader was sentenced for his participation in the now infamous corruption scandal. He will serve one year in prison and one year of supervised release for his role in embezzling $1.5 million in union funds, along with producing fraudulent tax documents to support the embezzled amount.

Speaking of the ten-year-long corruption scheme at the UAW, the union and the federal government reached a deal to settle the investigation. The UAW has agreed to: “the appointment of an independent monitor to keep tabs on the union’s financial affairs, a member referendum to ratify new methods of electing IEB [elected international leadership team] members, and payments by the former union officials to satisfy their unpaid tax liabilities.”

For a more comprehensive list of corruption among union bosses since the start of the year, check out this detailed article by LaborPains.com.

**********

It’s All Academic

The NLRB updated its rules for determining when adjuncts and non-tenure faculty at universities can join a union. Faculty members can only join a union if their school has a committee that exercises ‘effective control’ over school policies and curricula that the non-tenure faculty are unable to join. If a school does not have this sort of committee, then said faculty members are considered management employees with a reasonable voice in their daily operations and thus not eligible to unionize.

In the case of non-tenure track faculty at Elon University, the Board ruled in favor of the union’s attempt to organize, stating that the university did not meet “its burden” to prove that “non-tenure faculty are structurally included in the university’s faculty bodies.”

The NLRB also ruled this month that graduate nurses are professionals and eligible for a union vote.

**********

The Long Goodbye

After petitioning the state NLRB for a vote to remove the Operating Engineers union multiple times last year and being unlawfully denied due to ‘blocking charges’ filed by the union, workers at Rieth-Riley Construction Company in Michigan have finally been granted the opportunity for a decertification vote.

No doubt they will find the same success as Shamrock Foods employees in Idaho who voted out the Teamsters this month, after similar attempts from the union to block an election.

**********

Gig Economy

Proposition 22, which classifies rideshare drivers in California as independent contractors, took effect in December. Shortly after, a group of drivers filed a lawsuit to overturn the decision. That case was rejected by the California Supreme Court earlier this month. Prop 22 stands.

**********

Healthcare

SEIU locals are kicking up their focus on nursing care facilities.

In Pennsylvania, SEIU Healthcare petitioned the governor and health department to update nursing home regulations in the state. Proposed changes include increased staffing to increase per patient care, increased management oversight, higher wages and benefits, required stockpile of PPE, and more onsite training opportunities.

In Oregon, workers at Rawlin Memory Care went on strike to force union recognition (SEIU 503) via card check. No formal vote has been held.

**********

Minimum Rising

In a meeting with a group of mayors and governors earlier this month, Biden appeared to concede that a minimum wage hike to $15 is not likely to happen as a part of the current Covid-19 relief package.

In order to pass the relief package through reconciliation, which would mean at least 50 congressional votes, all democrats need to be on board. Due to the minimum wage provision, two are not: Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Senator Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona. Sinema argues that a minimum wage provision is not appropriate as part of a Covid relief bill (she’s not wrong); and Manchin says that in his part of the country, a $15 minimum wage is simply not sustainable for small businesses. He’d like to see it closer to $11.

The House will vote on Covid relief, including the minimum wage provision, by the weekend, at which point it will be sent back to the Senate. Democrats hope to have passed a relief package by March 15th.

**********

Labor Around the World

The U.K. Supreme Court ruled last week that Uber drivers are employees of the company who are entitled to minimum wage, paid holidays and other benefits. The degree to which the company has control over the services offered proved to be the determining factor. In the case of Uber and its drivers, this includes Uber’s control over fares, the driver rating system, and contract development.

Uber has 65,000 active drivers in the U.K.

**********

Sticky Fingers

Current charges or sentences of embezzling union officials:

  • Edward “Nick” Robinson – UAW:  $1,500,000
  • Dorothy McBride  CWA:  $635,000

https://nlpc.org/category/project-name/union-corruption-update/

**********

Labor Relations INK is published semi-weekly and is edited by Labor Relations Institute, Inc. Feel free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you think might enjoy it.

New subscribers can sign up by visiting: http://lrionline.com/free-stuff/newsletter-signup/

If you use content from this newsletter, please attribute it to Labor Relations Institute and include our website address: http://www.LRIonline.com

Contributing editors for this issue: Phillip Wilson, Greg Kittinger, and Meghan Jones

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to receive our labor relations newsletters and updates. You can manage your email preferences by clicking the link at the bottom of any of our email communications.

NOTE: if you are using older versions of Internet Explorer, read the text version, as the html may not load properly. We recommend upgrading to the latest version.

The post Labor Relations INK February 2021 appeared first on Labor Relations Institute.

Labor Relations Ink March 2021

$
0
0

In this issue:

  • PRO Act news
  • White collar tech workers organize
  • New online union organizing tools
  • Insight, Scoreboard and more…

**********

Labor Relations Insight by Phil Wilson

Could the 5th Amendment Save Us From the PRO Act?

Some of the most important Supreme Court decisions fly under the radar when first argued. Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, argued in front of the Supreme Court this week, is one of those cases.

In case you haven’t heard about Cedar Point (and I wouldn’t blame you, it wasn’t on my radar until last week) it is very interesting. The central question is under what circumstances can the government grant access to union organizers on a company’s private property? Cedar Point Nursery is a farm in California. Agricultural businesses like Cedar Point are excluded from coverage under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), so they are covered instead by California’s State Labor Code.

The California Code requires agricultural companies to give union organizers access to their property to help them organize agricultural workers. Organizers can be on the property up to 3 hours per day for 120 days per year. The original rule was adopted in 1975 at the urging of the United Farmworkers under the leadership of Cesar Chavez.

The employers in this case argued that the California regulation was an unconstitutional “taking” under the 5th amendment. As such, the State of California should have to pay just compensation to the company. But this case really isn’t about the lack of compensation – it’s really about whether the government should be allowed to compel access to private property in the first place.

The implications of this decision are far-reaching. That’s because the centerpiece of the Biden Administration’s labor policy, the PRO Act, relies on a number of similar provisions that both grant access to union organizers (“equal time” for example) and restrict employer access to their own workers (banning “captive audience” meetings). Additionally, the PRO Act includes numerous other provisions that might be considered takings (for example, requiring companies to accept labor contracts determined by outside arbitrators). The Cedar Point decision will clearly indicate how the current Court will balance property rights with government attempts to advantage union organizing.

It’s hard to predict how the Court will rule based on oral arguments. Often the questions asked don’t necessarily reflect how a Justice plans to vote on a particular case, but instead anticipate or attempt to refute arguments that another Justice might be considering. That said, the oral argument in Cedar Point does suggest a possible outcome.

This isn’t the first time the Court has had to deal with an issue like this. In the 1956 NLRB v. Babcock and Wilcox case, the Court faced a similar circumstance. Union organizers sought access to employees who worked in a remote location controlled by the employer. The NLRB found that refusing access for distributing literature on the employer’s property effectively prevented the union from reaching workers and found the employer’s no distribution rule unlawful.

The Court in Babcock and Wilcox disagreed. There the Court found that the union’s right to organize employees must be balanced against the employer’s property rights. They established the rule that where a union has other reasonable ways to access employees (like at their homes or in the community) then the employer was not required to give the union access to its property. The Court stated:

“…an employer may validly post his property against nonemployee distribution of union literature if reasonable efforts by the union through other available channels of communication will enable it to reach the employees with its message and if the employer’s notice or order does not discriminate against the union by allowing other distribution.”

The Babcock & Wilcox decision did not consider the 5th Amendment argument presented in Cedar Point. During the oral argument the Justices seemed concerned about ruling that the California regulation amounted to a government taking. Instead, Justice Kavanaugh suggested the Babcock & Wilcox balancing framework might be a better approach to resolving this dispute.

Most Justices seemed skeptical of using the takings clause in this way. They named numerous other situations where the government is granted access to a private employer’s property, especially safety and compliance investigations. Justice Breyer seemed especially concerned about the “dozens and dozens and dozens” of other laws that allowed inspections that might be impacted by this decision. He even expressed concern about restricting inspections of our private spaceships and electric cars. No kidding. Check out pages 12-13 for the head-scratching exchange that ends with Breyer reminding everyone that, “They had no spaceships at common law.”

Counsel for the Employer did make some strong arguments for why this case should be distinguished from other government inspections. The access provided here is not for an inspection. The property right is granted to non-government third parties. And this access is much more burdensome than other routine inspections. That said, it does look like the 5th Amendment argument faces some headwind with a majority of the Justices.

Even if the Court decides that the statute isn’t a per se taking under the 5th Amendment, the opinion in Cedar Point will be a very important prism for thinking about challenges to the PRO Act. That bill (which I anticipate will soon be considered by the Senate) is without doubt a much bigger infringement on employer property interests than the California regulation. Hopefully the Court anticipates these further encroachments as it decides what to do in Cedar Point. Unfortunately, they may get to consider it either way.

**********

Union Bailout Update

It came as no surprise when the House once again passed the PRO Act in early March. Although under current conditions there are not enough Senate votes to pass this bill into law, the “nuclear option” of removing the filibuster could grease the skids to take this to the finish line.

We noted in the February edition of INK a list of NLRB General Counsel decisions rescinded by acting GC Peter Ohr. Here is an updated list and a few other actions, capturing some of the additions since then.

NLRB Chairman Lauren McFerran’s dissent in an employee handbook case in February took to task the current board’s allowance of using a disclaimer to reconcile discrepancies between provisions in the handbook that may be at odds with union employees with a collective bargaining agreement. Once the board is constituted in a pro-union fashion, expect to see many of the handbook gains achieved by management during the prior administration eroded significantly.

The Trump administration took steps to reign in inconsistent and overly aggressive enforcement by field employees of the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor. The incoming deputy administrator of the WHD, Jessica Looman, revoked the instructions of the prior administrator, turning the 50 district offices loose to proceed at will. A March 8 memo from Looman delegated to regional administrators authority to greenlight their staff’s use of:

  • “Enhanced compliance agreements” in settlements, which generally require more egregious violators to take steps to ensure adherence to wage laws;
  • Visa certifications for undocumented workers who are victims of severe workplace crimes;
  • Cooperation agreements with state agencies to share information;
  • “Sharing letters” between WHD and other government agencies investigating the same workplace; and
  • Requests to withhold payments to government contractors who owe workers wages.

**********

Covid-19

The city of Long Beach, California, passed an ordinance requiring grocers to pay $4 more per hour to their employees. The California Grocers Association challenged the measure in court, and thus far has not prevailed. The city theorized that large grocery stores have made significant profits during the pandemic while their employees’ wages have remained the same, despite the increased risk of exposure to COVID-19 that grocery workers face. “Never let a good crisis go to waste…”

On February 24th, the Office of Inspector General called OSHA to task for not keeping up with pandemic-related safety issues. The administration has pushed OSHA to release an emergency standard, but none has been forthcoming to date.

**********

Tech/Media Unions

Glitch employees have signed the first collective bargaining agreement by white collar tech workers in the United States. This comes nearly a year after workers at Glitch voted to join the Communication Workers of America. The contract is unique in that it didn’t focus much on wage and benefit provisions, but rather on “just cause” protections for Glitch employees.

In the media sphere, Fortune magazine has filed a complaint with the NLRB against the NewsGuild of New York for failure to bargain. This came after a one-day strike by Fortune employees. The company and union have been trying to negotiate a contract since Fortune workers organized in 2019.

**********

SCOREBOARD

Who are the winners (and losers) of the labor movement? Don’t guess, just check the LRI Scoreboard

View this month’s scoreboard (archives also located here).

Download a PDF of this month’s scoreboard

**********

Union Corruption

New indictments have been handed down to John Dougherty, former business manager for IBEW Local 98 and his nephew, Gregory Fiocca, former shop steward for the same local. On March 3rd, each was indicted for one count of conspiracy to commit extortion and 18 counts of extortion.

These charges are separate from those brought on by the FBI in 2019 against Dougherty and seven others involved in the embezzlement, wire fraud, and bribery allegations associated with the Electrical Workers and their dealings.

**********

It’s All Academic

On March 15th, the NLRB withdrew a Trump-era proposed rule that attempted to end the recognition of private institution graduate students as employees under the NLRA. This came just after two labor victories for faculty at Elon University and Ithaca College, sending the message that, under Biden, the NLRB will continue to have jurisdiction over undergraduate, graduate student, and adjunct faculty labor complaints.

**********

Organizing

The UFCW took aim early at the cannabis industry, as their 2013 Cannabis Workers Rising initiative will attest. The pandemic didn’t seem to impede the drive, as organizing campaigns erupted and so-called labor peace agreements proliferated. New and emerging adult-use markets, especially in areas of the country with an existing larger union presence, have been the main targets.

Another union organizing website has popped up, sponsored at least in part by the group-funding conduit Patreon. This site takes a two-pronged approach of targeting consulting companies and law firms who assist companies in explaining the realities of unionization to employees, while offering to hook folks up with local unions.

**********

Right-to-Work

There are currently twenty-nine states with Right to Work laws. Montana was looking to be the thirtieth, but the measure was voted down in the Montana House of Representatives earlier this month by a wide margin, with 29 Republicans joining the Democrats in opposition.

**********

Healthcare

Nurses at St. Vincent Hospital in Massachusetts have been on strike since March 8. This comes after 18 months of negotiations. Striking nurses say they will continue to strike until a contract has been reached. Meanwhile, the hospital was forced to hire replacement workers, at which point over 100 of the striking nurses crossed the picket line to return to the job. Click here for details regarding key sticking points for nurses and the hospital.

At Maine Medical Center, the largest hospital in the state, nurses are preparing for their first union vote in over twenty years. If workers vote to organize, the Maine State Nurses Association would gain 1,900 new union members.

**********

Minimum Rising

The amendment to add an increase to the federal minimum wage to Biden’s $1.9 trillion COVID-19 relief bill failed to pass the Senate earlier this month. Despite that, we can expect it to remain high up on the agenda during the course of Biden’s tenure. In fact, other lawmakers have already proposed two other options.

The Higher Wages for American Workers Act is sponsored by Republicans Mitt Romney and Tom Cotton. It proposes to gradually increase hourly pay from $7.25 to $10 over the course of five years. Then after every two years, pay would increase to match the rate of inflation.

Additionally, Sen. Josh Hawley proposed the Blue-Collar Bonus Tax Credit. In this case, workers who make less than $16.50 an hour would receive quarterly payments from the IRS to make up the difference.

Wyoming also has a new bill on the table to increase its minimum wage to $15 per hour.

**********

Sticky Fingers

Current charges or sentences of embezzling union officials:

  • Stephen Rooze – BLET:  $140,064
  • Donald Snyder – NAGE/SEIU:  $94,649

http://nlpc.org/index.php?q=union-corruption-update

**********

Labor Relations INK is published semi-weekly and is edited by Labor Relations Institute, Inc. Feel free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you think might enjoy it.

New subscribers can sign up by visiting: http://lrionline.com/free-stuff/newsletter-signup/

If you use content from this newsletter please attribute it to Labor Relations Institute and include our website address: http://www.LRIonline.com

Contributing editors for this issue: Phillip Wilson, Greg Kittinger, and Meghan Jones

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to receive our labor relations newsletters and updates. You can manage your email preferences by clicking the link at the bottom of any of our email communications.

NOTE: if you are using older versions of Internet Explorer, read the text version, as the html may not load properly. We recommend upgrading to the latest version.

 

The post Labor Relations Ink March 2021 appeared first on Labor Relations Institute.

Labor Relations INK April 2021

$
0
0

In this issue:

  • Lessons from Bessemer
  • Sectoral Bargaining
  • White Collar Organizing Rising?
  • Insight, Sticky Fingers, Scoreboard and more…

**********

Labor Relations Insight by Phil Wilson

The PRO Act Pivot

The biggest union election in decades ended in a lopsided loss for the Retail Wholesale and Department Store Workers Union (RWDSU) in Bessemer Alabama earlier this month. Predictably, the entire labor movement is crying foul. The union just filed election objections, meaning that the election will be tied up in litigation for months or years. This is a brazen attempt by the union to disenfranchise the nearly 2,000 workers who told the RWDSU to get lost.

There have already been too many pixels spilled on this election and I’m not going to add to them here. But let’s be clear – the Bessemer election was never about representing the workers. It was always about justifying the PRO Act.

As soon as the results became clear, unions, academics, and politicians began trotting out all the greatest hits about how this election proves that labor law must be rewritten to help bail out Big Labor. Of course, they don’t say it that way. They claim the current rules allow horrible actions by evil companies who force their employees to work in 21st century sweatshops. These arguments are tired, condescending, and contradictory (if the rules are so stacked against unions why do they win 70% of elections?), but they are raining down now. They won’t stop until unions get what they want: the PRO Act.

The PRO Act is coming, one way or the other. If the employer community gets engaged, it may not pass this year or in its current form. It may not ultimately end up on Biden’s desk as legislation. But make no mistake: the key provisions of the PRO Act are coming, some of them very soon.

Here’s what a lot of people miss about the PRO Act. Most of its provisions do not require a legislative fix. Legislation is the preferred method, since it is virtually impossible to get rid of a law once it’s passed. But many of the provisions in the PRO Act can (and will) occur through rulemaking, case law, and operational changes at the agency level. Employers who aren’t pivoting to prepare for a PRO Act world are already way behind.

The PRO Act Pivot is what every company should do right now. That means proactively looking at everything you do with an eye toward the most likely changes coming in the next two years (with or without a legislative fix).

I’ll give one example of dozens. It is a certainty that the Department of Labor will reintroduce the persuader rule, and I predict that happens very soon. Ironically the provisions of the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act related to employer reporting were originally created to combat union corruption and collusion between unscrupulous unions and companies. But over the years the rule morphed into a way to discourage companies from relying on attorneys and consultants during organizing campaigns. It also gives unions a way to smear a company for the “crime” of getting advice about communicating legally about unions.

While the persuader rule is part of the PRO Act, Secretary Walsh isn’t waiting around for a legislative fix. I’d also anticipate changes in interpretive guidance around management reporting. A new persuader rule will face legal challenges just like the last one (that one even earned a nationwide injunction before it was pulled by the Trump administration). Hopefully those challenges will be successful. But putting all your eggs in that basket is like loading up on the latest hot stock tip on Reddit: potentially rewarding, but very risky (#stonks).

There are many other changes likely over the next two years, including:

  • Restrictions on mandatory meetings and employer communications;
  • Making it much harder for employers to demand elections, essentially back-dooring card-check;
  • Return to micro-units and even members-only units;
  • Increased and creative penalties for ULP violations, essentially turning remedial “make whole” relief into punitive penalties; and
  • Joint employer and independent contractor rules, and much more.

How should you pivot? Using the example of the persuader rule, here’s the approach I recommend. You’ll embark on two parallel tracks. First, what can you do now, before the rules change? Second, what will your approach look like in the future state?

On the persuader rule what you can do now is to make sure all of your campaign communications and tools are produced, reviewed and in place now. Remember the last version of the persuader rule originally required reporting all kinds of positive employee relations practices like employee surveys and vulnerability assessments. A smart company, especially one sensitive to reporting, should do a thorough review of their entire positive employee relations program now to identify gaps and fill those before the persuader rule is finalized.

The second track is equally important. What should your process and tools look like in a world where payments for these activities are now reported? For some companies, that will mean clearly communicating about the value of these activities. The idea that a company should be embarrassed for spending resources on following the law or creating a great workplace has never really made sense to me. But the claim will be made that this spending is bad for workers. You should be prepared to defend these expenditures in the face of negative PR.

Some companies may choose to invest in more heavily proactive ways, far Left of Boom, like on leadership training. These activities reduce labor risk but probably won’t trigger a reporting requirement. Others might choose to bring resources in-house. Whatever the right approach for your company, it is critical to figure that out now and to quickly head that direction. Bottom line: it’s time to pivot.

**********

Union Bailout Update

The Amazon unionization vote at a Bessemer, Alabama facility sucked up most of the media (and labor relations) attention in the last several weeks. The unprecedented public access to the vote count was reminiscent of watching the 1994 low-speed police chase of OJ Simpson’s Bronco on national television. Aware of the challenges of getting appropriate participation from the voting unit using a mail-ballot process, the company did everything it could to ensure voters felt safe, and that it was easy to cast their ballots. Police were asked to patrol the large parking areas to prevent intimidation, and the company requested the USPS install a mail box (which was surrounded by a tent to protect anonymity) so that voters could easily vote, and so there was less chance ballots would get lost in the mail if posted at random across the city via personal mail boxes or city-wide USPS mail receptacles.

Those interested in the final tally watched via Zoom as less than 16% of the Amazon employees voted to join the union. To no one’s surprise, following the typical union playbook the RWDSU filed a host of objections to the election, asking the NLRB to schedule a hearing to determine whether the results should be tossed out.

It remains to be seen what the new administration will do after this first experiment with transparency.

As a counterpoint, the NLRB paused a mail ballot election at the end of last month. Rush University Medical Center requested a stay to the election when the NLRB regional director, Paul Hitterman, alluded to but did not analyse the arguments made by the hospital to hold an in-person election. The hospital contends that it meets the bar for in-person elections according to the board’s guidance in Aspirus Keweenaw.

Also in the “no surprise” department was the new administration’s announcement to ignore and move to repeal union financial disclosure rules enacted by the prior administration. The rule, part of the DOL’s Office of Labor-Management Standards effort to reign in union malfeasance, established new reporting mandates for many unions regarding their strike funds, apprenticeship programs, and other trusts.

Other moves by the NLRB are aimed at expanding the board’s “enforcement” efforts. New Spanish-language websites and social media accounts, and an expectation for increased funding, point to a more aggressive NLRB trolling for business.

Case in point, acting board General Counsel Peter Ohr released a memorandum announcing “vigorous reinforcement” of protected concerted activity. As Ohr states in his memorandum: “I look forward to robustly enforcing the Act’s provisions that protect employee Section 7 rights with full knowledge that recent decisions issued by the current Board have restricted those protections.”

A unanimous 3-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit appeals court encouraged the NLRB to use a recent T-Mobile case to clarify when employee-sponsored organizations are illegal “company unions,” claiming board decisions have been inconsistent in recent years.

If you want to get some tips from the Michigan Department of Labor on how to organize a union, you can join this live Q&A session on April 26th, 5-6:30 MI time!

**********

Covid-Related

The rumor-mill is all abuzz about whether or not OSHA will prescribe an emergency rule for Covid precautions in the workplace. Earlier this month, Labor Chief Walsh said he needed more analysis, and then no more than a week later speculation began again that employers should prepare for something soon. Nothing to do but wait and see. If OSHA does put a rule in place, many believe it will look similar to what Virginia has implemented, wherein safety measures are determined based on the risk of exposure unique to each workplace.

California’s Governor Newsom signed a bill last week that requires hotel, event center, airport hospitality and janitorial employers to rehire any workers that were laid off in the last year due to the pandemic before they hire new employees.

**********

SEIU Pushes to Import European-Style Unionization

The SEIU is leading a charge to bring sectoral bargaining to the U.S.  Ignoring the largest labor federation in the U.S. (the AFL-CIO), the Chamber of Commerce, and recent developments in Europe (German companies are fleeing such arrangements in droves upon being given the chance), the ultra-activist SEIU is touting a Biden endorsement and a recent report issued from the Democratically-controlled House Education and Labor Committee.

Sectoral bargaining—also known as multiemployer, industrywide, or broad-based bargaining—is a form of collective bargaining that covers all workers in a sector of the economy. The U.S. follows a model of enterprise bargaining (based on individual workplaces) whereas much of Europe uses the sectoral model.

**********

SCORE BOARD

Who are the winners (and losers) of the labor movement? Don’t guess, just check the LRI Scoreboard

View this month’s scoreboard (archives also located here).

Download a PDF of this month’s scoreboard

**********

Organizing

We could be in the midst of a white collar organizing boom. Say hello to the Tech Times Guild, a union of 650 tech workers at the New York Times. Also, staff at the Brooking Institution and the Urban Institute asked their employers for voluntary recognition of their affiliation with the Nonprofit Professional Employees Union, IFPTE Local 70.

**********

Manufacturing/Miners

Two months ago a U.S. District Judge approved a consent decree that would put the Auto Workers under a federal monitor for six years. Prosecutors selected veteran lawyer Neil Barofsky, after reviewing multiple candidates proposed by UAW. If approved, Barofsky would “head a team tasked with implementing reforms that target union election, compliance, and investigations.” Barofsky previously served as special inspector general for the organization’s Troubled Asset Relief Program.

One UAW member, Matt Horner, said he thinks it’s “obnoxious the UAW had the ability to choose the monitor given the severity and extent of the crimes committed by our former leadership.” We agree.

In other UAW news, 3,000 workers are on strike at the Volvo plant in Dublin, Virginia. More details here.

Coal miners in Alabama are also on strike trying to earn back the concessions their union agreed to five years ago that restored only $1.50 out of the $6 paycut workers had previously received. They have been on strike since April 1 and have been publicly blasting their union, the United Mine Workers of America, for selling them out in the process.

Meanwhile, UMWA has also reportedly signaled that they will support a transition away from fossil fuel in exchange for “new jobs in renewable energy, spending on technology to make coal cleaner and financial aid for miners who lose their jobs.”

**********

Healthcare

The strike by hundreds of nurses at St. Vincent Hospital in Worcester, Massachusetts entered its 7th week on Monday. It comes after two years of contract negotiations between Massachusetts Nurses Association and Dallas-based, Tenet Healthcare. Staffing is said to be the main area of contention.

On the organizing front, 613 residents and fellow physicians at UMass Medical School voted to join the SEIU’s Committee of Interns and Residents last month.

This article from JD Supra proposes that micro units are an inevitable reality again with Biden’s NLRB. If that does prove to be true, it’ll be much like it was before the NLRB overruled Speciality Healthcare in 2017, which is to say, hospitals and healthcare employers beware.

**********

Alt-Labor

Nonunion worker groups have been popping up for the last decade and while much of that movement began with a real intention by Big Labor unions (or more specifically, the Service Employees) to boost their ranks through the largely untapped collective of minimum wage workers in the restaurant and service industries, we have seen a significant shift in recent years toward independently-led worker groups looking to come together to effect change on a societal level.

On occasion though, we do see a worker center transition toward union representation. Late last month, KY 120 United, a Kentucky worker group, did just that when it joined with the American Federation of Teachers. KY 120 United stood out in 2018 when they began holding sick-outs (protesting workers would call in sick on the same day) as a way to skirt the Kentucky law that says it is illegal for public employees to strike, regardless of union representation.

**********

Sticky Fingers

Current charges or sentences of embezzling union officials:

  • Trey Huffty – USW:  $37,368
  • Thomas Burkhart – USW:  $19,900
  • Rodney Priestley – ILA:  $32,230
  • Brian Walker – ILA:  $20,001
  • Lamar Elliott – ACT:  $44,806
  • Scott Peterson – IAF:  $22,622
  • Brenda Walters – APWU:  $95,100

http://nlpc.org/index.php?q=union-corruption-update

**********

Labor Relations INK is published semi-weekly and is edited by Labor Relations Institute, Inc. Feel free to pass this newsletter on to anyone you think might enjoy it.

New subscribers can sign up by visiting: http://lrionline.com/free-stuff/newsletter-signup/

If you use content from this newsletter please attribute it to Labor Relations Institute and include our website address: http://www.LRIonline.com

Contributing editors for this issue: Phillip Wilson, Greg Kittinger, and Meghan Jones

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to receive our labor relations newsletters and updates. You can manage your email preferences by clicking the link at the bottom of any of our email communications.

NOTE: if you are using older versions of Internet Explorer, read the text version, as the html may not load properly. We recommend upgrading to the latest version.

 

 

The post Labor Relations INK April 2021 appeared first on Labor Relations Institute.

Viewing all 142 articles
Browse latest View live